Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ketanji Brown Jackson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Trying to lighten things up?) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::If you feel so strongly about it, why don't you write an essay on the subject. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 14:01, April 13, 2022 (EDT) | ::If you feel so strongly about it, why don't you write an essay on the subject. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]</sup> 14:01, April 13, 2022 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Is the opening sentence a joke? But perhaps I have a silly sense of humour. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 17:47, April 15, 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:47, April 15, 2022
Birthing Person
I will try to be civil but "Birthing Person" is unbelievable twaddle. Judge Jackson's answer, to a loaded political question, "I'm not a biologist", was perfectly correct . Don't be so stupid, as a woman she knows what she is. However, she was speaking at the hearing as a lawyer, dummy (my apologies)! I have difficulty sorting out parody/vandalism on Conservapedia. --Jackin the box (talk) 11:29, April 13, 2022 (EDT)
- I now see that this is indeed a liberal politically correct neologism.[1]
- If you feel so strongly about it, why don't you write an essay on the subject. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 14:01, April 13, 2022 (EDT)
- Is the opening sentence a joke? But perhaps I have a silly sense of humour. --Jackin the box (talk) 17:47, April 15, 2022 (EDT)