Difference between revisions of "Talk:Christopher Wray"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::As to allegations of "photoshopping", like the Trump pee tape, it's an ongoing investigation that can't be commented on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 18:28, August 16, 2022 (EDT) | :::As to allegations of "photoshopping", like the Trump pee tape, it's an ongoing investigation that can't be commented on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 18:28, August 16, 2022 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::Then we have an issue with a possible conflict of interest with federal magistrate Bruce Reinhart, who defended Epstein co-conspirators, if indeed the Epstein client list was among the documents. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 18:35, August 16, 2022 (EDT) | + | :::Then we have an issue with a possible conflict of interest with federal magistrate Bruce Reinhart, who defended Epstein co-conspirators, if indeed the Epstein client list was among the declassified DOJ documents. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 18:35, August 16, 2022 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:37, August 16, 2022
There are times when critics of Conservapedia point out the rabid stupidity of certain articles on the website. This article is one of them. Who is their right mind would use a photoshopped picture of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to libel Judge Bruce Reinhart? Even Sean Hannity thinks this photo being used on Fox News is incredibly stupid. Another thing. If Trump issued an executive order to declassify all documents he allegedly took to Mar-a-Lago, what is the order number? [1] Don’t bother looking, you won’t find this mythical executive order. There is a procedure to declassify classified documents and information, but the funny thing is, Trump waving his hand like a Jedi and saying ‘declassify’ is not a part of it. [2] I sure hope the incredibly stupid edits will be removed, but I predict this will not happen. --LSimons (talk) 16:03, August 16, 2022 (EDT)
- The DNI says otherwise. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 17:45, August 16, 2022 (EDT)
- Even CNN legal analysts say SCOTUS will side with Trump. [3] As to the DNI, both Grenell & Ratcliffe back up Trump's statement. It should be noted in this particular case, Trump delegated declassification orders to the AG (Bill Barr) to avoid a conflict of interest, subordinating the DNI to the AG for this particular matter.
- As to allegations of "photoshopping", like the Trump pee tape, it's an ongoing investigation that can't be commented on. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 18:28, August 16, 2022 (EDT)
- Then we have an issue with a possible conflict of interest with federal magistrate Bruce Reinhart, who defended Epstein co-conspirators, if indeed the Epstein client list was among the declassified DOJ documents. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 18:35, August 16, 2022 (EDT)