Difference between revisions of "NetChoice v. Paxton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In '''''NetChoice v. Paxton''''', the [[Fifth Circuit]] ruled against continued [[liberal censorship]] by [[Big Tech]]. | In '''''NetChoice v. Paxton''''', the [[Fifth Circuit]] ruled against continued [[liberal censorship]] by [[Big Tech]]. | ||
| − | Judge Andrew Oldham wrote the decision for the 2-1 panel of the court, decided on September 16, 2022.<ref>https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-51178-CV1.pdf</ref> | + | Judge Andrew Oldham wrote the decision for the 2-1 panel of the court, decided on September 16, 2022.<ref>https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-51178-CV1.pdf</ref> The entire opinions run 113 pages, of which Judge [[Edith Jones]]' concurrence is 2 pages and Judge Leslie Southwick's dissent is 20 pages. |
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[category:law]] | [[category:law]] | ||
Revision as of 04:29, September 17, 2022
In NetChoice v. Paxton, the Fifth Circuit ruled against continued liberal censorship by Big Tech.
Judge Andrew Oldham wrote the decision for the 2-1 panel of the court, decided on September 16, 2022.[1] The entire opinions run 113 pages, of which Judge Edith Jones' concurrence is 2 pages and Judge Leslie Southwick's dissent is 20 pages.