Difference between revisions of "User talk:HenryS/Archive001"
("IMBD" It's IMDB) |
|||
| Line 499: | Line 499: | ||
== "IMBD" It's IMDB == | == "IMBD" It's IMDB == | ||
| − | You messed up when you changed my new page "Imdb" to "IMBD." Nice catch, I meant to put it in capitals, but you got the B and D mixed up. I would change it, but I don't know how, or if I even can, just letting you know so it can be accurate ;) [[User:Dareisay|Dareisay]] 22:10, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | + | You messed up when you changed my new page "Imdb" to "IMBD." Nice catch, I meant to put it in capitals, but you got the B and D mixed up. I would change it, but I don't know how, or if I even can, just letting you know so it can be accurate ;) here's a link: http://www.conservapedia.com/Imdb [[User:Dareisay|Dareisay]] 22:10, 12 June 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:11, June 13, 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Bohdan, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Bohdan!
Hojimachongtalk 20:40, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Please sign you talk comments by typing "--~ ~ ~ ~" after your post (without the quote marks or spaces). It is a pain to have to go to the history every time I want to see who typed something.--Elamdri 18:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
- Very nice entries from the Ukraine, Bohdan! This is important history that everyone needs to learn more about. Thank you!--Aschlafly 09:18, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
Noam Chomsky
Why do you keep reverting my edits, I'm trying to keep this article as neutral as possible --DemocraticSocialist 11:10, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
Global Warming
Sorry about the period thing - if that other guy would stop taking out my edit, it wouldn't be an issue!Jacobin 18:28, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Huh?
I just thought the userbox was silly. I don't like Putin, but Ryan Seacrest--that guy's annoying. Flippin 16:33, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
- I see. Nope, I'm a Nodak. I live in Grand Forks, ND. Mostly I work as a writer, but get so easily sidetracked with this site. Flippin 16:53, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
- LOL, thanks! ;) Flippin 16:57, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Fixed
I fixed the main talk page and rm'ed your denial since in made little sense after I added the correct attribution.-- Rob Pommertalk 01:28, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for the rapid action
Truthandjustice is no more. Thanks for your keen eye in catching his vandalism, and reverting it. Good job! --~ Sysop-TK /MyTalk 06:38, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
Sherlock Holmes
Thank you Bohdan for correcting my Sherlock Holmes edit. It's rather late over here in Blighty and my sanity is probably best recharged with sleep ; )
Hehehe, sorry. My bad. Blighty is an affectionate word for England. And yes, it's 4:07 am over here. Thankfully my wife is used to my insomnia ; )
Dedication or maybe too much coffee ; ) And yes, I'd like to see two plaques - one for Sherlock Holmes and one for Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. A great detective and a great writer...
Ice
By the way, in case you really were curious about ice go | here. Tmtoulouse 22:49, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- This is suspicious. Adds to the theory of you being Icewedg... :D GodlessLiberal 18:06, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
No worries
I will still try and get by with out your vote. Thanks for telling me. But in the future, leave North Dakota out of it. ;-) Flippin 15:14, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
- Ah, Minnesnowta in the springtime....Flippin 15:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for the vote.
Thanks for the vote. Conservative 22:08, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Political compass
To quote from what I say on my talk page…
your a commi? --Will N. 12:03, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- No, I'm not. Politicalcompass.org simply indicates what political viewpoints you tend towards, not what you actually are. --Hacker
(Write some code)12:53, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
Hope this is informative. --Hacker(Write some code • Support my RfA) 22:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
User:Sanity
You should mention it to a sysop before going and blanking someone's user page. Although I do agree with you that it was detrimental to Conservapedia, I believe you could have gone about it a bit smarter. You could have tried mention on a sysop's talk page or put it under current alerts. --AdrianP 02:54, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
- The page was signed by Icewedg. He's a bit of a troublemaker 'round these parts. We just remove his junk when we see it. --Sulgran 02:59, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
- I understand why you removed what he posted. I just don't understand why you would go about blanking a page prior to getting a sysop's approval. --AdrianP 03:04, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
- Well we've never had to get admin approval for removing Icewedgisms before so why start? --Sulgran 03:07, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
the user was blocked a month agoBohdan
- Thank you Bohdan, for your fast action! It is appreciated. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 07:16, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Lorena Ochoa
Thank you for your help. Good one...
--Joaquín Martínez 00:24, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
Leo Tolstoy
Thanks again for your help. The pic is wonderful. It could be better if you put in the image history the source.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 22:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Yes.
It is very important to be sure that it is public domain.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 22:21, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
At Olga's Gallery main page:
http://www.abcgallery.com/index.html
They say:
Copyright © 1999-2007 Olga's Gallery. All rights reserved.
For me I think that for non commercial purposes the pic is fine but it is better to ask a Sysop.
Hope this help.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 22:33, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Forgive me for butting in (here), but if something says "Copyright ©, All rights reserved." There are very few legal reasons why you can ever copy it. So best not to. Keep in mind that this site is a dot com, owned by a lawyer, and promotes some of his business interests. At the very least, get Andy's opinion, based on the true source and the use here. Human 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
- The image was created over one hundred years ago. That means public domain.Bohdan
- Forgive me for butting in (here), but if something says "Copyright ©, All rights reserved." There are very few legal reasons why you can ever copy it. So best not to. Keep in mind that this site is a dot com, owned by a lawyer, and promotes some of his business interests. At the very least, get Andy's opinion, based on the true source and the use here. Human 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
Ukraine
Dobre den Bohdan, yak vi? I liked your article on Ukraine. I dropped by your user page and saw your Putin is a monster image, quite amusing. Hannibal ad portas 07:10, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- No, I studied Ukrainian at university about 15 or longer years ago. I liked it more than Russian. I would like to improve my understanding of Ukrainian. Unfortunately I have no Ukrainian contacts. I'm Anglo Saxon (with a touch of Irish). Hannibal ad portas 23:40, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Feedback
Thank you for the feedback regarding my edits. DrSandstone 17:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
categories - I think that is a good idea
I think that is a good idea. Conservative 19:31, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
I have no idea if it is good or not, since it was obviously not presented to the Sysops as a group, but just one. :-| --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 23:36, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Re: Request for help
Yup, I'll work on it. Always glad to be of techie service! BTW, you knew me once as Hacker, and feel free to bring any tech questions to me. --Liπus the Turbohacker(contact me) 22:11, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
- Finished it, sorry for the delay, didn't find time. --Liπus the Turbohacker(contact me) 15:57, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
- You're very welcome. Do you want the color scheme or something else changed simply to aesthetically improve it? --Liπus the Turbohacker(contact me) 16:41, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Re- big bang
That's because I really believe in it! :p. Thanks. --WikinterpreterLiaise with the cabal?
No e-mail address
No e-mail address From Conservapedia
This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users :-( That's okay, I have mine enabled... --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 03:50, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
- Its now enabledBohdan
Богдан Зиновій Михайлович Хмельницький
Добре день Богдан, very nice article on your namesake. Hannibal ad portas 21:19, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Thanks
For the info; I'm not all that great with Eastern European ethnic groups. Ole! --Hojimachongtalk 17:43, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Not sure
Perhaps you could try: "Finland held the position of Presidency of the European Union Council the at the time of the murder; the Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs released this statement:" I'd fix it, but aside from grammatical problems, I don't have a background or interest in Anna Politkovskaya. HeartOfGold 18:19, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
- Now I understood that it was little funny - "at the time of something" is mainly understood as a frase. Thanks about fixing! :) This kind of misstakes are typical for non-natives... --Aulis Eskola 18:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
do you want me to put a protect on your userpage so people cannot vandalize it?
do you want me to put a protect on your userpage so people cannot vandalize it? If a "protection" was put on your userpage only Sysops could edit it.Conservative 19:51, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Protected
I protected the user page and removed the vandalism counter. Conservative 19:59, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
- YOur welcome. Conservative 20:00, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Neanderthals
Thanks for the note. It is an established scientific fact that brain size does not necessarily affect intelligence; elephants have brains the size of a beach ball, with a similar structure. In the same species, however, brain size might affect intelligence, as evidenced here. However, considering the fact that evidence suggests a genetic difference large enough to merit seperate binomial classification, that argument is somewhat invalid. It has also been shown that the brain size of humans has increased over the past tens of thousands of years (or, in your case, 6,000 years), as shown here. The fact that neanderthals had brains which were significantly larger than modern humans (also a well-known fact which creationists agree upon, but if you're not convinced, it ain't too hard to dig up) would suggest intellectual superiority, if they were indeed a subgenus of Homo sapiens. However, they died out some time ago. Hope that helps, --Hojimachongtalk 17:51, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
- Don't worry, most people do get lost. Thanks for the curiosity; your persistence helps the project. --Hojimachongtalk 17:55, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
How did you fix Albania i couldn't find a way? -Box 22:28, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
You are now a Sysop
Bohdan, Conservapedia’s entry count has reached 9,700, and due to your outstanding contributions, you have been chosen as a winner of the Sysop contest. Congratulations! Here are some links about your new privileges:
- Conservapedia:Administrators
- Conservapedia:Blocking policy
- Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks
- Conservapedia:Abuse
Thank you for your excellent contributions to Conservapedia. We look forward to building this site with your help.
Sincerely,
The Conservapedia Panel User:CPanel
- This is quite an honor. I will do my best. Thank you very much.Bohdan
*applauds as Bohdan catches a vandal* Nice job right off the bat. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk 13:36, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- I'm sure Bohdan will be one of our best Sysops. His work around here has been amazing. ~ SharonTalk 13:39, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
Congratulations
Congratulations, Bohdan. Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. HeartOfGold 14:24, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- Also, did you find out who was responsible here? HeartOfGold 14:26, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- I just dug into it, it was another user BOx (note capital O) who messed things up here. This user BOx was blocked, too. HeartOfGold 14:47, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
I expect lots of trouble with the user boxes, and templates. Please keep an eye out! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 14:52, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- I have previously indicated this, but I think pro-actively locking very popular user boxes (and templates) would be prudent, and not an undue burdern. HeartOfGold 14:54, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- Why not just lock them all? (the user boxes) --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk 14:56, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- Because there's already a problem with to many temps being locked. Using semi-protection, let me repeat that, semi-protection, would be fine. --Binary42 20:32, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- I'll leave that to the discression of those with power. But user boxes that are only used in one or two places are not as great of a risk. Either way would be fine, but locking all might create a greater burden on the sysops if they are edited frequently for legitimate reasons. HeartOfGold 15:31, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- PhilipR has expressed some reservations about doing that. Perhaps you can convince him otherwise....--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 15:49, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- 'Gratz! --Hojimachongtalk 17:27, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
Excellent work. Congratulations --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 21:59, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
Definitions
- In Wiki terminology, a "sock" (short for "sockpuppet") is an account which has been created by a banned user, for the intention of circumventing the block. If there was a real person named "John" who had an account called "Bob", and the account "Bob" was blocked, and John created a new account called "Joe", then "Joe" would be a sockpuppet.
- A "Troll" is a general term for anybody who comes somewhere solely for the purposes of being rude, obnoxious, or disruptive.
Congratulations on becoming a sysop! --Hojimachongtalk 20:51, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- You're quite welcome, and have fun using your new tools. --Hojimachongtalk 20:56, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
Blocking
Great job blocking! I'm not sure if anyone told you this yet: when blocking vandals, uncheck the "block anonymous users only" box. The block is more secure this way. Thanks, ~ SharonTalk 20:58, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- Don't worry about it! I only figured it out recently. I will let you know if I think of anything else you might want to know, but for now, you are doing a great job. ~ SharonTalk 21:02, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
Congratulations on your new Sysop status!
Congratulations on your new Sysop status! Conservative 21:13, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
- Congrats (belated) Geo.Talk 12:24, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
Notice
Please direct new Sysops to this article: New Sysops Training Page Conservative 20:55, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
I will update that new sysop page
I will update that new sysop page to show how to use the IP checker. Conservative 21:00, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
- I just updated the instruction page above. Conservative 21:17, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
Addition
I noticed you asked someone to delete Additive Identity of Addition a while ago ... now that you're a sysop you can do this. (and should since it's pointless) Jrssr5 12:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
- doneBohdan
Edit summary
A small point but could you include an edit summary even for minor changes (such as sp for spelling). You can set your preferences to automatically remind you. BrianCo 13:16, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
Question....
I do not mind any Sysop editing my page at any time, so long as notice is given here (or via IM, which most of us use to reach one another) so I am aware there was a problem. What you have read here before were users claiming there was a problem, creating a sensation, and yet later we found they never actually "fixed" anything, so you can see now what their true motives were, eh? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 01:39, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
Thanks
thank you for fixing the American Values Club article! Truthseeker101 22:46, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
Signature Suggestion....
Perhaps look at a few others, and format yours so the date and time of your posts shows? Thanks! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 07:53, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks! Helps keep things sorted, if you ever post out of turn, as sometimes has to happen. Looks like you need to change your vandal count again! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 19:23, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
A new user has reverted one of your edits
Please see where what I believe may have been your edits were reverted. Thanks. HeartOfGoldtalk 17:53, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
Request
Bohdan, hello. Just a request. When you edit articles, it would be useful if you characterized your edit in the edit box. This makes the logs much more useful. I learned this trick from practices in concurrent software development. However, I don't always follow my own advice, but I do endeavor to whenever I think about it. Thanks. HeartOfGoldtalk 19:39, 20 May 2007 (EDT) I'll try to rememberBohdan Talk 22:00, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
- I mentioned this in an earlier archived post. Don't forget you can set your preferences to automatically remind you! BrianCo 23:40, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
Infoboxes
I just occasioned upon one of your Hetmans of Ukrainian Kozaks pages and noticed the infobox at the bottom. Well done. This really helps in coordinating information. It has almost inspired me to make my own. I hope others take note. BrianCo 04:32, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Thank you
Thanks for the kind words on my work on the Dan Rather article. And, of course, congratulations on becoming a sysop. ;-) Learn together 13:11, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Zeus
Thanks for fixing that. --Colest 15:29, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
- It's Zeus, I went out to check it when I figured out what I did. --Colest 15:31, 21 May 2007 (EDT
just saying hey
Hey Bohdan. It's me, GL. Just saying hello to you before I get blocked. :) Reaganomist2 15:57, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
- LOL....the poor things. They have such a burning need to argue, they go to any lengths to get on here again. Carrying around all that hate must be such a burden. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 17:02, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
- With all respect, communicate more. Most of us message/email with each other several times each day. I have sent you several emails, never once gotten a response, lol. Don't let life pass you by! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 04:24, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
- I like your new signature! The Cyrillic text is cool. FortyTwo 18:41, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
hello
I may need you to come and give input on the atheism article if you don't mind. While I would not want to see atheism slammed, there seem to be difficulties that are starting to approach a wikipedia view more than a conservapedia view. I've learned to value your editing, so your help could certainly be appreciated. Any reading of the recent history, and the links that keep getting put back in, should suffice to show that some people are trying to make the article go beyond an encyclopedic view of atheism. Thanks Learn together 19:34, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
- We are a Christian/Conservative friendly encyclopedia. Edit accordingly. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 22:28, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
Thank you for your assistance Bohdan, and for your support TK. I miss heart of gold too; he was not only a voice of reason, but he took the time to explain himself in an articulate and encompassing manner. Learn together 02:50, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
- I quite agree, Learn. In life we take what joy we can from our sometimes too brief associations with others, eh? :-) --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 03:00, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
My pleasure
I have been waiting for it all this days.
Keep going... brother...
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 23:40, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
Nice PIC.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 16:43, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
Think we got em all?
Think we got them all?--Will N. 12:01, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
- An IP block would be better in this instance. Fox 12:03, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
SO MUCH FUN!!!!--Will N. 12:05, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
Images
Yes, please do. Andy's asked us to protect all images after an instance when somebody vandalized an image on the front page. DanH 15:18, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
Voting Rights Act
Kindly note the following passage in the cite that I have already included in this article:
"Six Southern Democrats voted FOR the measure, including Senator George A. Smathers (Florida), who thus cast his first vote for a civil rights bill in his 15 years as a Senator. The others: Senators ALBERT A. GORE (Tennessee), Ross Bass (Tennessee), Mike Monroney (Oklahoma), Fred R. Harris (Oklahoma) and Ralph W. Yarborough (Texas). Thirty-seven Southern Democrats had voted for passage in the House. --PF Fox 17:26, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
Support for RfA
Thanks for your support Bohdan! Congratulations on your making sysop recently. Crocoite Talk Support my RfA) 23:27, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
Oops
You confused me for a second there. I was redirecting "Vaccum Cleaner" to "Vacuum cleaner" when it seemed to disappear. I thought it was something I did, but then I realized it was you. Ha Ha. --ErnstR 00:16, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
Hi!
And hello to you to. It's good to be back. If I'm being unhelpful, remember to give me a 2 minute block ;-) --ύικι ντερπρετηρ talk?
Crusades
Just glad I can help. Thank you for the encouragement. Lostcaesar 16:41, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
Many thanks
Thank you for including me in your list of "notable users" category. I am honored. Hopefully we can both continue to contribute positively to conservapedia in ways that will continue to improve the quality and scope of the articles. It has been a pleasure working side by side with you. ;-) Learn together 23:13, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
Hello again my friend. As a sysop and a person who has proven himself, I was wondering based upon my work if you felt I was worthy of a sysop nomination at this point? I don't wish to intercede in any area which I have not yet earned, and yet if I have given contributions at a level where you feel this is warranted, then I would be pleased to be brought up for the honor. I'll knock this off TK too and see what he thinks. If you both agree, then I know I'm in pretty good hands. Thanks ;-) Learn together 23:36, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
Thank you for the kind words on my talk page. I'm up for nomination now my friend. Your support would be greatly appreciated. ;-) Learn together 17:19, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Re: Your Comment.
I don't care if he was a liberal or not. I'm certainly no liberal - I'm far more radical in my outlook than any self-professed liberal would claim to be I don't think we should change the system, I think we should tear it down. I call them as I see them; if someone writes that poorly in an encyclopedia with claims of being "trustworthy," I'll take it out. Sevenstring 19:20, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
RE: Give it up buddy
Why should I, "buddy?" On the one hand, we have a person who has cogently argued his point. On the other, we have a person who lacks the wherewithall to make an argument, and resorts to changing the subject when he is losing. If thisngs look too bad, hebans people for disagreeing with him
Hojiliberal
Of course you may use it, userboxen are for sharing! --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:27, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
Quetzalcoatl
Wow! That was quick! DanH 23:17, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
Are You A Liberal? Meh, No?
Hi Bohdan,
The trick with questions like this is that some people think it's absolute ("if you believe X Y Z, you are liberal / conservative") while others think it is relative ("you are to the left / right of me on X Y Z, you are liberal / conservative"). This is complicated by the fact that X, Y, and Z are different issues for different people. The most obvious example on Conservapedia seems to be Evolution vs. Creationism. The site leader has made it clear that he equates beliefs in Evolution with other things, like school prayer. Someone like me, who thinks that the evidence of Evolution is strong, but still supports prayer in school, doesn't register (typically he calls someone like this a liberal liar pretending to be a conservative to sneak into debates). In any event, getting a simple answer to your question from ONE person may be easy, but the answer will change depending on who you ask. For pete's sake, TK is willing to say that the font you use in your sig is indicative of liberalism (no, TK, you didn't say it proved anything, but it's 0% relevant and only stood to score a point).
In the end, you have to define what you are for yourself, in my opinion, or at least be defined by the community you actually live in, rather than communities you only visit such as this one.
Of course, this also begs the question "what difference does it make?" The actual important issue is where you stand on any given issue (again in my opinion), not what label gets slapped on you based on your sum of beliefs. Radicals on both sides of the aisle try to turn the common name for the other side into an insult. Ignore that, and I think you'll quickly find that your label doesn't matter to you. :) Regards, Aziraphale 14:40, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry about the X Y Z confusion, but when you related them to math you were exactly right: they're variables, meaning they can change. The point being, for you the most important issues to define someone are abortion, evolution, and school prayer, while for me they might be economic policy, foreign policy, and abortion. So when the site leader, for example, calls someone a liberal you have to know not only which issues matter, but what the liberal and conservative stances are on those issues. His definitions of those are different from mine, and mine may be different from yours, and yours may be different from . . . you get the idea.
- AAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnyway... long story short: asking somebody else if you're a liberal or conservative, when you've answered the question for yourself already, is an easy way to get yourself confused - which I only mention because you've said a couple times now that you've been confused by people's answers. Just don't ask. ;) Regards, Aziraphale 14:59, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
- This is making my head spin. So, what am I? Conservative/Conservative, Liberal/Conservative? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:37, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Helen...
Oh, they will be mad about that! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:43, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
User Dafydd
Bohdan, what do you mean? Please leave message as it is bed time for me. See you tomorrow. Dafydd 18:23, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
Mexican Cities
No prob, Bob. But what I'm adding right now are Mexican states. Maestro 21:37, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
Goodbye
My W/P name is Ozdaren. Drop bye of you want to say hello. Hannibal ad portas 23:12, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
Thanks
Thanks Bohdan. Your support is appreciated. Crocoite Talk 23:32, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
No castle....
Blocks
Bohdan, thanks for your great blocks. May I suggest that if it is vandalism, then please block for infinite duration. The vandals virtually never reform. Thanks!--Aschlafly 17:33, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
CAN YOU UNBLOCK HIM?
CAN YOU UNBLOCK HIM? Conservative 18:42, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
CAN You UNBLOCK objectiveguy?
CAN You UNBLOCK user:objectiveguy? I am not positive how to do it. Are you positive as far as how to undo the block? Conservative 18:44, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
Chomsky
The linking of chomsky's supposed anti-semitism to "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a complete fabrication and makes the site look stupid. Can you unblock so I can remove the offending phrase? Fantomas 10:50, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
protecting
you must have the quickest trigger finger in the ukraine, that's the second time I've seen you protect an image I've uploaded in less than a minute, lol --Colest 21:11, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
- No everything is fine, I was just making a weak attempt at humor. Don't mind me. :) --Colest 22:43, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
Block...please explain via email
Ok? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 21:13, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
I believe Andy should resolve the TK/Conservative issue and.......
I believe Andy should resolve the TK/Conservative issue and I also think that TK was rude to my guest LostCaesar (who everyone agrees is a valuable editor) and lately has been rude to me. If I thought the issue could be resolved privately I would have done it. I don't think this is the case, however. The blocking of tomstpete was the straw that broke the camel's back. It is my hope that TK and I would return to good relations and time will tell. Conservative 15:36, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
Putin paper
I ended up getting an A on it. DanH 15:56, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Image upload
Hey! Is it possible for you to grant me upload privileges for a few minutes so i can upload a picture of my grandchild for my user page :)? --Grandpa 20:31, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
- Wait. I'm confused ( sorry it comes with age ) did you mean can't because this guy is a sysop isnt he, Banned a user right after I made my account he did. Or did you mean sysops cant do that and it has to be the main site administrator? --Grandpa 20:42, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
- Exactly so. We do not grant that ability, and it is only done so for people with proven edits, over time. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:46, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
- Indeed. --Grandpa 20:47, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Clean Page....
The Party will reward you, Citizen!! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 22:28, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Yes, it is interesting. I am glad people are weighing in. I have more to say on the topic, of course. Amyz, 15:45, June 12, 2007 (EDT)
Chomsky
About the "Protocols..." these have been known as a hoax almost as soon as their publishication in English in the early 20th century. They cannot be considered "classic anti-Semitism", they are more conspiracy theory (similar to "holy blood holy grail" I think). Basically I think giving the "protocols" credence by linking them with a serious problem such as anti-semitism denigrates the accuracy of the article. If you want to compare Chomsky's sayings/theories with those of the "protocols" then refer to them as a hoax - it's just more correct. In my opinion. (thanks, by the way) Fantomas 13:46, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
I think that's better than previous, though you might want to cite something. Fantomas 13:56, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Please contact this reporter
Bohdan, please give an interview to this reporter ASAP at stephanie.simon@latimes.com . Her deadline on her story about Conservapedia is soon. Thanks.--Aschlafly 16:14, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
- If you'd like to give an interview about Conservapedia, then send the reporter above an email. I've put her email address in bold. Describe yourself as an editor originally from the Ukraine, and what you like about Conservapedia, and ask her if she has any questions for you.--Aschlafly 16:59, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
"IMBD" It's IMDB
You messed up when you changed my new page "Imdb" to "IMBD." Nice catch, I meant to put it in capitals, but you got the B and D mixed up. I would change it, but I don't know how, or if I even can, just letting you know so it can be accurate ;) here's a link: http://www.conservapedia.com/Imdb Dareisay 22:10, 12 June 2007 (EDT)