Difference between revisions of "Sham indictment"
(Abuse of concept of conspiracy) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
(A heavily Dem county in Georgia sham indicted 19 Republicans on Aug. 14, 2023, creating a potential crisis for the Nation as to whether GOP states would recognize this political stunt by Democrats.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Sometimes a sham [[indictment]] is a prosecutorial tactic to pressure a witness to make accusations against the primary target of the politicized prosecutors. | Sometimes a sham [[indictment]] is a prosecutorial tactic to pressure a witness to make accusations against the primary target of the politicized prosecutors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A heavily [[Dem]] county in [[Georgia]] sham indicted 19 [[Republican]]s on Aug. 14, 2023, creating a potential crisis for the Nation as to whether [[GOP]] states would recognize this political stunt by Democrats. | ||
[[Category:Criminal Law]] | [[Category:Criminal Law]] | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 06:59, August 15, 2023
A sham indictment is a misuse of prosecutorial power for political gain or simply a headline-grabbing abuse of power. Increasingly sham indictments are used by liberal Democrats in order to defeat a Republican candidate for office, or to censor those who work against election fraud.
Abuse of the legal concept of "conspiracy" -- which is supposed to require proof of an actual agreement to do an unlawful act -- is a tool of sham indictments that are filled with statements and actions by others which the accused never made or did.
Sometimes a sham indictment is a prosecutorial tactic to pressure a witness to make accusations against the primary target of the politicized prosecutors.
A heavily Dem county in Georgia sham indicted 19 Republicans on Aug. 14, 2023, creating a potential crisis for the Nation as to whether GOP states would recognize this political stunt by Democrats.