Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/Forecasting"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 87: Line 87:
  
 
Doom and gloomers:
 
Doom and gloomers:
 +
 +
*[https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=564912168&sxsrf=AB5stBia0i7dppFQ1U7hfPoQadLxEuG-8w:1694580368311&q=nouriel+roubini&tbm=nws&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj01pXn46aBAxU5jIkEHWVtAVYQ0pQJegQIDBAB&biw=1920&bih=941&dpr=1 Nouriel Roubini]
  
 
*[https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/ Economic collapse blog]
 
*[https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/ Economic collapse blog]

Revision as of 04:47, September 13, 2023

Economics

General forecasting

Political forecasting

1. Political expert forecasts

2. Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being: "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the left and the right—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."[1]

3. Political betting markets have better accuracy than polls and pundits.

Economic forecasting

Yield curve

The difficulty of long term economic forecasting for various companies/sectors/countries

Difficulty of short term economic forecasting due to various factors

Videos/podcast, investing/business/trends


General economic trend forecasting related info

Sources:

Doom and gloomers:

References

  1. ↑ Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being by Arthur C. Brooks, The Atlantic, 2020