Conservapedia:AFD Rapists

According to Conservapedia:Commandments:

“	Any content you create or change (including edits, new pages, images and links) must be informative, family-friendly [emphasis added], clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language.	”
—Rule #3

This category in particular violates the "family-friendly" and "clean" part. Conservapedia is not an encyclopedia primarily obsessed with documenting people convicted of sexual crimes. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 09:27, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

• I'm in agreement here. What's next? Category:Accused rapists so DJT can be added? Half of humanity will end up here. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:08, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

It's an orphan Category now anyway. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:11, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

When the Category is Deleted, it needs to be Protected against recreation, so if there arises an actual need in the future for the Category, an Admin has to approve it. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:12, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Well, you know that I can't protect pages or titles. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:13, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

[EC] "Accused rapists"? Obviously not. Denying due process to lynch alleged "rapists" is a longstanding Democratic Party characteristic, spanning from the Jim Crow era to the Kavanaugh smear. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:13, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

If you hold a door open for a woman nowadays you can be accused of inappropriate sexual harassment. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:19, September 18, 2023 (EDT)