Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aschlafly"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I trust this clarifies matters.😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) | :I trust this clarifies matters.😄 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In my opinion there is a witchhunt against Conservative for being a genuine conservative Christian who stands up to the Russian propaganda being spread, likely at the behest of the Wagner Group's Internet Research Agency, here at Conservapedia. Conservapedia is being used to spread Communist Russian propaganda on behalf on Communist China, Communist Russia, and Communist North Korea as well as the Communist BRICS coalition backing Communist China and Communist Russia. Conservative looks to be a main obstacle to spreading Russian propaganda so there is a movement among Russia's left-wing Communist trolls to oust him, even though Conservative's positions are classical right-wing socially conservative positions. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] ([[User talk:JZambrano|talk]]) 08:49, September 20, 2025 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:49, September 20, 2025
This why the warmongering of neocons & CP Admin will fail
You cannot fight a war against Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela or anybody with liberal/conservative, left/right divisions in the American populace.
And it's only getting worse.
These advocates of perpetual war are only hastening a bad ending. RobSZelensky Must Go! 18:25, September 19, 2025 (EDT)
- Using objective and sound criteria, is User: Conservative at Conservapedia, whose user page is https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative , is User: Conservative a neocon warmonger or is the opposite very likely true?: "The opposite is very likely true. User:Conservative, a prominent contributor and administrator on Conservapedia, demonstrates views that align more closely with skepticism toward neoconservative interventionism and prolonged military engagements than with enthusiastic support for them. This assessment is based on an analysis of his authored or associated content on the site, focusing on objective indicators such as direct statements on foreign policy, historical wars, and contemporary conflicts."
- Using objective and sound criteria, is User: Conservative at Conservapedia, whose user page is https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative , is User: Conservative a neocon warmonger or is the opposite very likely true?: "There is no objective basis to label User: Conservative as a “neocon warmonger.” The user appears instead oriented around cultural conservatism, anti-atheist and anti-evolutionist content, and criticism of globalism. Therefore, if anything, the opposite claim—that the user is not a neocon, and likely opposes typical neocon foreign-policy positions—is much better supported. Unless you locate specific statements by this user explicitly advocating foreign military intervention, calling them a neocon warmonger would be a mischaracterization."
- I trust this clarifies matters.😄 Conservative (talk)
In my opinion there is a witchhunt against Conservative for being a genuine conservative Christian who stands up to the Russian propaganda being spread, likely at the behest of the Wagner Group's Internet Research Agency, here at Conservapedia. Conservapedia is being used to spread Communist Russian propaganda on behalf on Communist China, Communist Russia, and Communist North Korea as well as the Communist BRICS coalition backing Communist China and Communist Russia. Conservative looks to be a main obstacle to spreading Russian propaganda so there is a movement among Russia's left-wing Communist trolls to oust him, even though Conservative's positions are classical right-wing socially conservative positions. --Joshua Zambrano (talk) 08:49, September 20, 2025 (EDT)