Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stephen Kotkin"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:''"A recent online dust-up between Hoover Institution historian [[Niall Ferguson]] and [[Vice President J.D. Vance]] perfectly captures the fault line dividing today’s [[rightwing|right]]. Out: [[globalism]]. In: [[America First]].
 
:''"A recent online dust-up between Hoover Institution historian [[Niall Ferguson]] and [[Vice President J.D. Vance]] perfectly captures the fault line dividing today’s [[rightwing|right]]. Out: [[globalism]]. In: [[America First]].
  
−
:Actually, I've been hearing more of Kotkin in recent weeks, not because I want to, but because he keeps coming up on my autofeed (such are the [[AI claptrap]] and [[algorithm]]s in [[YouTube]]). Despite being [[anti-Trump]], I find his criticism of [[Samuel Huntington]] in agreement with my own since the 1990s. One thing is for certain, he is not the vehement [[Russophobe]] that you paint him. This gives just one more of your misuse of sources and incessant [[trolling]] I must keep an eye on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]</sup> 17:56, February 24, 2026 (EST)
+
:Actually, I've been hearing more of Kotkin in recent weeks, not because I want to, but because he keeps coming up on my autofeed (such is the [[AI claptrap]] and [[algorithm]]s in [[YouTube]]). Despite being [[anti-Trump]], I find his criticism of [[Samuel Huntington]] in agreement with my own since the 1990s. One thing is for certain, he is not the vehement [[Russophobe]] that you paint him. This gives just one more of your misuse of sources and incessant [[trolling]] I must keep an eye on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]</sup> 17:56, February 24, 2026 (EST)

Revision as of 23:00, February 24, 2026

The Conservapedia search engine is polluted with 68 spam references to Kotkin from User:Conservative's liberal claptrap essays. RobSZelensky Must Go! 12:49, August 25, 2025 (EDT)

Ever since neoconservativism became a dirty word after the Iraq war, the Hoover Institution has been attempting to scrub its reputation and website from being renowned as a bastion and hub for the development of "neoconswervative thought": The Stanford Review: Hoover's Neoconservatism Can't Last, February 21, 2025:

"A recent online dust-up between Hoover Institution historian Niall Ferguson and Vice President J.D. Vance perfectly captures the fault line dividing today’s right. Out: globalism. In: America First.
Actually, I've been hearing more of Kotkin in recent weeks, not because I want to, but because he keeps coming up on my autofeed (such is the AI claptrap and algorithms in YouTube). Despite being anti-Trump, I find his criticism of Samuel Huntington in agreement with my own since the 1990s. One thing is for certain, he is not the vehement Russophobe that you paint him. This gives just one more of your misuse of sources and incessant trolling I must keep an eye on. RobSAbnormal is fine. Stupid isn't. 17:56, February 24, 2026 (EST)