Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Supreme Court Project"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Pending Docket: added link to Conservapedia cert granted list)
(added caveat)
Line 46: Line 46:
 
== Pending Docket ==
 
== Pending Docket ==
  
−
*[http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/ Oyez website listing of Cert. granted for 2007 Term]
+
*Conservapedia analysis: [[2007 Cert Granted]]
 +
 
 +
*[http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/ Oyez website listing of Cert. granted for 2007 Term] NOTE THAT THIS LIST IS OFTEN OUT-OF-DATE
 +
 
  
−
*Conservapedia analysis: [[2007 Cert Granted]]
 
  
 
== Worst Decisions ==
 
== Worst Decisions ==

Revision as of 18:05, July 24, 2007

Welcome to the Supreme Court Project, which will harness the power of this collaborative site to analyze and explain the U.S. Supreme Court, its significance, its direction, and suggest legal approaches for change.

This page is for brainstorming on how to proceed with this project. Areas of interest are:

  • precedents overturned by the Roberts Court
  • recent decisions
  • cases being appealed to the Court
  • philosophies of the Justices
  • prior decisions that can be overturned
  • religion
  • abortion
  • private property
  • Second Amendment
  • evolution
  • law enforcement
  • pornography
  • taxation
  • sovereignty

Please add your comments here to this important effort! Many now view the U.S. Supreme Court as being more important that Congress and the President combined!--Aschlafly 16:16, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

Current Justices

Issues where the Court now has 5 votes, with the replacement by Justice Alito of Justice O'Connor's seat, to overturn liberal precedents:

See Essay:Reversible Court Decisions


Pending Docket


Worst Decisions

Liberal and other resources on the U.S. Supreme Court