Difference between revisions of "Reviewer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(creation) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) (categorize) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents their opinions to their [[audience]] via print, television, or the internet. | A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents their opinions to their [[audience]] via print, television, or the internet. | ||
| − | A talented | + | A talented reviewer can help the potential consumer tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not. |
Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about its creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own. | Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about its creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[category:art]] | ||
Revision as of 21:33, July 30, 2007
A reviewer is someone who analyzes and judges a work of art or entertainment and presents their opinions to their audience via print, television, or the internet.
A talented reviewer can help the potential consumer tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not.
Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about its creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own.