Difference between revisions of "Template:Examples of Liberal Bias"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Examples of Liberal Style: added example re: callousness)
(some prioritizing; more welcome)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The style of a [[liberal]] often includes these characteristics:
 
The style of a [[liberal]] often includes these characteristics:
  
 +
#insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate, or [[last wordism]]
 
#attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks
 
#attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks
 
#calling others "extremist"
 
#calling others "extremist"
−
#deny the obvious and embrace the implausible
+
#deny the obvious and embrace the implausible; see examples of [[liberal denial]]
 
#attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]]
 
#overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]]
 
#unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement
 
#unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement
−
#calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref>
 
−
#denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]]
 
 
#denial of accountability
 
#denial of accountability
 +
#believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office
 
#insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!"
 
#insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!"
 
#concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them
 
#concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them
Line 20: Line 20:
 
#resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]
 
#resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]
 
#preference for obscenity and profanity  <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref>
 
#preference for obscenity and profanity  <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref>
−
#insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate
 
 
#over-reliance on [[mockery]] <ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[User:Graham|Graham]] 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT)  
 
#over-reliance on [[mockery]] <ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[User:Graham|Graham]] 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT)  
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298334&oldid=298314#Burma]</ref> <ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298334&oldid=298314#Burma]</ref> <ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
Line 45: Line 44:
 
#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
 
#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
 
#selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain.
 
#selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain.
−
#believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements.
 
 
#silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref>
 
#silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref>
 
#can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]).
 
#can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]).
Line 51: Line 49:
 
#"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}}
 
#"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}}
 
#Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence.
 
#Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence.
 +
#calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref>
 +
#denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 00:47, February 7, 2008

Examples of Liberal Style

The style of a liberal often includes these characteristics:

  1. insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate, or last wordism
  2. attempting to portray conservatives as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks
  3. calling others "extremist"
  4. deny the obvious and embrace the implausible; see examples of liberal denial
  5. attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true
  6. attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true
  7. overreliance on hearsay, such as the false claim that most support evolution
  8. unjustified praise of atheists and other liberals as "geniuses", despite little achievement
  9. denial of accountability
  10. believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office
  11. insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for Beethoven, then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!"
  12. concealing one's liberal views rather than admitting them
  13. calling conservative free speech "hate" speech [1]
  14. calling conservative humor "unprofessional and meaningless, and degrades the quality of your encyclopedia." [2]
  15. pretending to know more than he does; Isaac Newton admitted that he knew almost nothing, yet a liberal rarely admits that and often pretends to know more than he does
  16. resistance to quantifying things, such as liberal bias or openmindedness
  17. preference for obscenity and profanity [3]
  18. over-reliance on mockery [4] [5] [6] [7]
  19. over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy [8]
  20. hostility to faith
  21. insistence on censoring certain speech, such as a description of The Flood or even teaching children about a massive flood, despite its acceptance by a majority of Americans[Citation Needed]
  22. believing that the education of children is for liberals to control
  23. believing that conservatives will fail, and refusing to accept when they succeed, as when George W. Bush won in 2000
  24. reluctance to admit that anything is morally wrong
  25. bullying conservatives who disagree with liberal views
  26. draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical
  27. claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their position to be false
  28. often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," while never saying that about a fellow liberal (such as Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton)[9] [10]
  29. willing to give away everything held dear by the majority to avoid serious conflict (such as the appeasement of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, or those liberals who wish to pull our troops out of Iraq, and embolden the terrorists).
  30. using hyperbole instead of fact-based logic in an attempt to tug at people's emotions rather than appealing to their sense of reason.[11]
  31. often long-winded and verbose, and in debates liberals often consume more than their fair share of the alloted time, leaving less time for the other side.
  32. attempting to control the rules of evidence used in a debate. For example, claiming that Young Earth Creationism is false, and then refusing to allow supporting evidence by claiming that the scientists are religiously motivated.
  33. attempting to control the definitions of words through political correctness. For example, referring to Israel as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda.
  34. Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" [12]
  35. Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women.[Citation Needed]
  36. Will often deny being a liberal, or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles.
  37. using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that liberals over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing liberal hypocrisy. But their example does not help their argument. Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that liberals do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism). Think about that.
  38. selectively citing the Bible when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain.
  39. silly demands for apologies.[13]
  40. can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-Christian) and bias (e.g., Bias in Wikipedia).
  41. inability or unwillingness to differentiate between genuine conservative arguments and parodies of conservative arguments.
  42. "Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.[Citation Needed]
  43. Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence.
  44. calling the use of the term liberal when used in a derogatory context "stupid"[14]
  45. denial that people can grow out of a liberal viewpoint, such as atheism

References

  1. ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Deletion_Policy&rcid=279869 Before the article was deleted, it said "New page: American Taliban You site is nothing but a Democratic hate site".
  2. ↑ --Tmcfulton 17:36, 13 November 2007 (EST) [1]
  3. ↑ When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself by Matthew Sheffield at NewsBusters
  4. ↑ "adolescent berating of Liberals" Graham 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT) [2]
  5. ↑ "I would appreciate a little less paranoia Graham 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT) [3]
  6. ↑ "IN fact, this should be regarded as 'idiot's style'" Graham 08:26, 23 September 2007 (EDT) [4]
  7. ↑ "The toilets overflowed at school today...if only the liberals had allowed religion in school, this never would have happened." BillOhannity on October 1, 2007
  8. ↑ God and the Presidential Election, Bill O'Reilly, Human Events, December 29, 2007
  9. ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#I.27m_Done Porthos on 27 September 2007
  10. ↑ [5] RidiculouslyLiberal, November 3, 2007
  11. ↑ Anti-evolution teachings gain foothold in U.S. schools
  12. ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]
  13. ↑ Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad
  14. ↑ "Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [6]