Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (link) |
(refined) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* I'm not aware of that! (without admitting a failure to look) | * I'm not aware of that! (without admitting a failure to look) | ||
* I've never seen that in the [[New York Times]]! | * I've never seen that in the [[New York Times]]! | ||
| − | * That's not what it said in | + | * That's not what it said in my ([[public school]]) textbook! |
| − | |||
* Let's talk about something else! | * Let's talk about something else! | ||
* I'm not interested in that! | * I'm not interested in that! | ||
Revision as of 02:33, February 25, 2008
Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:
- Democrats refusing to acknowledge Barack Obama's appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters
- materialists refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for migration and homing
- evolutionists refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the whale[1]
- liberals refuse to address how socialism destroys productivity
- abortionists refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have abortions
- Advocates of the global warming theory refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.
(add more)
Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:
- I'm not aware of that! (without admitting a failure to look)
- I've never seen that in the New York Times!
- That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!
- Let's talk about something else!
- I'm not interested in that!