User talk:BertSchlossberg

Sorry to revert your link addition to Korean Airlines Flight 007; there was already a link to that particular page just above it. Karajou 12:46, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Getting the hang of it. I thought it was because of the different colored print.BertSchlossberg 18:57, 18 December 2007 (EST)Bert SchlossbergBertSchlossberg 18:57, 18 December 2007 (EST)

You're not THE Bert Schlossberg, are you? Karajou 07:19, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Useful links

• How to edit a wiki
• CP Commandments
• CP Guidelines
• Style Manual
• Editing Etiquette
• How to create and maintain high-quality articles
• Conservapedia's Original Source Project
• Report Problems
• List of Templates

Welcome!

Hello, BertSchlossberg, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, BertSchlossberg!

Philip J. Rayment 08:32, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Signature

You seem to be having a bit of a problem with your signature. All you need to do is type four tildes (~~~~) or click the signature button on the editing toolbar. Philip J. Rayment 09:00, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Suddenly, finally, I got it! I'll try it now. Thanks BertSchlossberg 20:48, 24 December 2007 (EST)Eureka...it works!BertSchlossberg 20:48, 24 December 2007 (EST)

Book

Well, Bert, I didn't read your book yet, but the theory on survivors of KAL 007 is very compelling. If possible, there's room to improve that article, and I would love you to do it. Karajou 10:35, 19 December 2007 (EST)

In a short while, I'll try. Thanks, Karajou! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BertSchlossberg (talk)

I would not love this. If you have a book, please publish it first. I deleted the conspiracy section. If you wish, you can copy it to your userspace, e.g., User:BertSchlossberg/KAL 007 conspiracy. Let me know if you need help with this. --Ed Poor ^Talk 20:01, 20 December 2007 (EST)

You'd not love what? Him improving the article? Huh? And what makes you think that if he "has a book", he hasn't published it? By the looks of this, he already has. Philip J. Rayment 20:41, 20 December 2007 (EST)

Oop! Sorry, Bert. I guess I should be less hasty. Welcome to Conservapedia, and please accept this correction with my compliments. --Ed Poor ^Talk 20:45, 20 December 2007 (EST)

Heh, I liked your edit comment[1]. :-) Philip J. Rayment 21:43, 20 December 2007 (EST)

Minor adjustment [2] of your edit to KAL 007, and only to make it fit in with the rest of the article. Karajou 08:04, 21 December 2007 (EST)

And so you did. Thanks, Karajou!

Ed, Don't give a thought to it. You're a man of passion! Thanks for the welcome to Conservapedia.BertSchlossberg 09:42, 21 December 2007 (EST)Bert SchlossbergBertSchlossberg 09:42, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Holocaust

Fixed the entry in question. This is also an article that could use some improvement and expansion; to me it is too brief. Any ideas would be helpful. Karajou 05:30, 21 December 2007 (EST)

KAL

It's ok if you want to link to your article, but please keep it relevant to the page and relevant on the page. HelpJazz 17:53, 10 January 2008 (EST)

I noticed your link in Ronald Reagan. That's more along the lines of what's appropriate. I didn't mean to seem heavy-handed; I wouldn't have removed them but I figured you knew best where they should go. HelpJazz 13:07, 12 January 2008 (EST)

You weren't heavy-handed. You were directive and it helped me to get things together. Thanks!BertSchlossberg 16:48, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Interesting edits

Interesting edits. Thanks. By the way, I noticed someone reverted one of your edits and just let me know if you think any reversion was unjustified: User talk:Aschlafly.

Oh, one other thing: you'd be a terrific addition to the list of contestants for our upcoming contest. These are very fun and this will be our fourth. Just add your name to the list here: Conservapedia:Contest4. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 08:45, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Ashlafly, I never thanked you for the commendation and suggestion that I add my name onto the contest. I want to do that now. Maybe, I will for the next contestBertSchlossberg 15:57, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Minor change by PhoenixWright

Hi, Bert. You can click on this "diff link" to see the minor change made by User:PhoenixWright. He only changed the wording of a heading slightly. --Ed Poor ^Talk 07:31, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Thanks Ed, Passed me by no matter how many times I read it!BertSchlossberg 08:04, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Talk responses

Ed, I have a minor question. When I respond to someone like I responded to you above, should I respond on your User talk or mine - as I have done?BertSchlossberg 17:26, 16 March 2008 (EDT)

I'm not Ed, but if you don't mind, I'll give an answer.

There's no requirement either way, but I think responding on the same page is the most common way of doing it, and many editors (including me) actually have a notice at the top of their talk page asking that people do that.

Philip J. Rayment 21:16, 16 March 2008 (EDT)