Difference between revisions of "Liberal gullibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(circular reasoning added to the list, with example) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* anything [[Barack Obama]] says is true, because he is for "hope and change" | * anything [[Barack Obama]] says is true, because he is for "hope and change" | ||
* Barack Obama has no connections to [[Islam]] whatsoever | * Barack Obama has no connections to [[Islam]] whatsoever | ||
| + | * use circular reasoning to "prove" something, as in assuming an element had a half-life of 700 million years in order to "prove" that the universe is older than 700 million years. | ||
(add more) | (add more) | ||
[[category:psychology]] | [[category:psychology]] | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 02:58, April 27, 2008
Liberal gullibility is the tendency of some people to easily believe false liberal claims. Michael Moore makes a fortune from liberal gullibility and Al Gore won a Nobel Prize on the back of it.
Examples of liberal gullibility include:
- taking away guns will prevent gun crime
- global warming must be caused by man
- providing government health care for all will reduce illness
- government programs can reduce poverty by giving more money away
- the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are
- the Piltdown Man is the missing link, and so was the Nebraska Man!
- anything Barack Obama says is true, because he is for "hope and change"
- Barack Obama has no connections to Islam whatsoever
- use circular reasoning to "prove" something, as in assuming an element had a half-life of 700 million years in order to "prove" that the universe is older than 700 million years.
(add more)