Difference between revisions of "Talk:Religulous"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:He claims to be a libertarian, which is what got me to watch his show a few times. However, he's pretty anti-corpratist and economically liberal. A libertarian who's economically liberal is just a liberal. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:21, 26 September 2008 (EDT) | :He claims to be a libertarian, which is what got me to watch his show a few times. However, he's pretty anti-corpratist and economically liberal. A libertarian who's economically liberal is just a liberal. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:21, 26 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | + | ::Well then we should remain consistent because Bill Maher is called a socialist on [[Bill Maher|his own article]]. Last I checked however, someone who favors gonverment interference in economic issues, to whatever degree, is a socialist. --[[User:Stirlatez|Stirlatez]] 18:23, 30 September 2008 (EDT) | |
| + | |||
| + | :::Yes, his article does say that... it probably needs changed as well. However, socialism is more than simply "favoring government interference in economic issues." [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:44, 30 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:44, September 30, 2008
Is Bill Maher really outspokenly socialist? I've never heard him talk about his socialism, but he's obviously pretty liberal. Outspokenly liberal, perhaps? HelpJazz 20:51, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
-Last time I checked, he was a libertarian. Not the same thing as a socialist, by a long shot. Bill Maher is outspoken in a lot of subjects. It doesn't make him a socialist. CodyH 22:49, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
- He claims to be a libertarian, which is what got me to watch his show a few times. However, he's pretty anti-corpratist and economically liberal. A libertarian who's economically liberal is just a liberal. HelpJazz 23:21, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well then we should remain consistent because Bill Maher is called a socialist on his own article. Last I checked however, someone who favors gonverment interference in economic issues, to whatever degree, is a socialist. --Stirlatez 18:23, 30 September 2008 (EDT)