Difference between revisions of "Top Conservative news websites"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(cnsnews becomes King of the Hill; how long can it stay at #1?)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1
 
|1
−
|
+
|[http://www.cnsnews.com/home Cybercast News]
−
|
+
|uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2
 
|2
Line 16: Line 16:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3
 
|3
−
|[http://www.cnsnews.com/home Cybercast News]
 
−
|uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones
 
−
|-
 
−
|4
 
 
|[http://www.lifenews.com/ lifenews]
 
|[http://www.lifenews.com/ lifenews]
 
|superb in reporting news affecting [[pro-life]] issues, which are many; this site is very high quality and could move higher in rankings
 
|superb in reporting news affecting [[pro-life]] issues, which are many; this site is very high quality and could move higher in rankings
 
|-
 
|-
−
|5
+
|4
 
|[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart]
 
|[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart]
 
|breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well
 
|breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well
 
|-
 
|-
−
|6
+
|5
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|7
 
 
|[http://hotair.com/ Hotair]
 
|[http://hotair.com/ Hotair]
 
|witty, insightful and timely; could move higher in ranking
 
|witty, insightful and timely; could move higher in ranking
 
|-
 
|-
−
|8
+
|6
 
|[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState]
 
|[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState]
 
|timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues
 
|timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues
 
|-
 
|-
−
|9
+
|7
 
|[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters]
 
|[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters]
 
|insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well
 
|insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well
 
|-
 
|-
−
|10
+
|8
 
|[http://www.foxnews.com Fox News]
 
|[http://www.foxnews.com Fox News]
 
|high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include [[Ron Paul]], [[Rand Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]] and [[Steve Lonegan]].</ref> and downplays the social issues
 
|high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include [[Ron Paul]], [[Rand Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]] and [[Steve Lonegan]].</ref> and downplays the social issues
 +
|-
 +
|9
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|10
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 23:26, September 4, 2010

Conservapedia is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types. Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like.

Rank Information Source Comments
1 Cybercast News uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones
2 WorldNetDaily has reporters at conservative events; not afraid to criticize or take on tough issues; gives writers good leeway
3 lifenews superb in reporting news affecting pro-life issues, which are many; this site is very high quality and could move higher in rankings
4 Breitbart breaks some big stories and exposes liberal deceit well
5 Hotair witty, insightful and timely; could move higher in ranking
6 RedState timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues
7 Newsbusters insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well
8 Fox News high volume of info, but censors many conservatives[1] and downplays the social issues
9
10

Nominations

Tentative placement (high ranking, medium ranking, low ranking) in parentheses, suggestions welcome:

  • americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues)
  • breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating liberal news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues)
  • canadafreepress.com
  • catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by lamestream media)
  • climateaudit.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)
  • cnsnews.com (high, especially for news censored by lamestream media, but it does not update news as frequently as other top sites)
  • examiner.com (high)
  • Fox News (low, but high volume)
  • Gerald Celente YouTube channel (respects US Constitution, anti-Federal Reserve, limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, predicted Tea Party Movement and the Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously)
  • hotair.com (medium)
  • humanevents.com
  • lifenews.com (high quality, high volume; reports on social issues better than anyone)
  • michellemalkin.com (high or medium)
  • NewsBusters (medium)
  • newsmax.com (medium)
  • pajamasmedia.com
  • politico.com (medium)
  • rasmussenreports.com (high or medium, but high quality poll statistics)
  • redstate.com (medium)
  • rightwingnews.com (low due to crass and vulgar style)
  • rushlimbaugh.com (medium or low, but high volume/quality conservative radio transcripts)
  • sepp.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)
  • spectator.com
  • thehill.com
  • VisionVictory YouTube channel (Christian, respects US Constitution, anti-Federal Reserve, limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, pro-Tea Party Movement, predicted Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously)
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Weekly Standard
  • wnd.com (Worldnet Daily) (medium. good op-ed writers, but suffers from sales gimmicks interspersed in headlines)

Other sources:

  • Realclearpolitics (detailed polling about upcoming congressional elections)

Criteria

  • substantive
  • educational
  • includes social issues
  • does not play favorites among individuals
  • does not waste time and energy on gossip
  • factual accuracy[2]
  • does not rely on offensive, non-family-friendly material to boost traffic
  • informs as well as attracting interest
  • original content

(add more)

See also

References

  1. ↑ Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Pat Buchanan, Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, Michael Steele, J.D. Hayworth and Steve Lonegan.
  2. ↑ "Factual accuracy," per Conservapedia's Manual of Style: "The party affiliation of a news source should be irrelevant. All that matters is whether the source has a record of telling the truth."