Difference between revisions of "Top Conservative news websites"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Nominations: add politics daily)
(better than the lamestream media in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; it has been very liberal on feminism in sports (Title IX), however)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|10
 
|10
−
|
+
|[[USA Today]]
−
|
+
|better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; it has been very liberal on [[feminism]] in sports ([[Title IX]]), however
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 02:43, November 1, 2010

Conservapedia is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types. Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like.

Rank Information Source Comments
1 Cybercast News uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones
2 WorldNetDaily has reporters at conservative events; not afraid to criticize or take on tough issues; gives writers good leeway
3 lifenews superb in reporting news affecting pro-life issues, which are many; this site is very high quality and could move higher in rankings
4 Breitbart breaks some big stories and exposes liberal deceit well
5 Hotair witty, insightful and timely; superb links; but often neoconservative rather than socially conservative
6 RedState timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues
7 Newsbusters insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well
8 Fox News high volume of info, but censors many conservatives[1] and downplays the social issues (for example, see: Fox News and homosexuality)
9 Christian Science Monitor refreshing in its lack of lamestream media liberal bias
10 USA Today better than the lamestream media in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; it has been very liberal on feminism in sports (Title IX), however

Nominations

Tentative placement (high ranking, medium ranking, low ranking) in parentheses, suggestions welcome:

  • americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues)
  • biggovernment.com
  • bighollywood.com
  • bigjournalism.com
  • bigpeace.com
  • breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating liberal news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues)
  • breitbart.tv
  • canadafreepress.com
  • catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by lamestream media)
  • climateaudit.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)
  • cnsnews.com (high, especially for news censored by lamestream media, but it does not update news as frequently as other top sites)
  • examiner.com (high)
  • Fox News (low, but high volume)
  • http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com
  • Gerald Celente YouTube channel (respects US Constitution, anti-Federal Reserve, limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, predicted Tea Party Movement and the Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously)
  • frontpagemag.com
  • hotair.com (medium)
  • humanevents.com
  • intellectualconservative.com
  • lifenews.com (high quality, high volume; reports on social issues better than anyone)
  • mediaite.com
  • michellemalkin.com (high or medium)
  • moonbattery.com
  • NewsBusters (medium)
  • newsmax.com (medium)
  • pajamasmedia.com
  • politico.com (medium)
  • politicsdaily.com
  • rasmussenreports.com (high or medium, but high quality poll statistics)
  • redstate.com (medium)
  • rightwingnews.com (low due to crass and vulgar style)
  • rushlimbaugh.com (medium or low, but high volume/quality conservative radio transcripts)
  • sepp.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)
  • spectator.com
  • thedailycaller.com
  • thehill.com
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Weekly Standard
  • wnd.com (Worldnet Daily) (medium. good op-ed writers, but suffers from sales gimmicks interspersed in headlines)

Other sources:

  • Realclearpolitics (detailed polling about upcoming congressional elections)

Criteria

  • substantive
  • educational
  • includes social issues
  • does not play favorites among individuals
  • does not waste time and energy on gossip
  • factual accuracy[2]
  • does not rely on offensive, non-family-friendly material to boost traffic
  • informs as well as attracting interest
  • original content

(add more)

See also

References

  1. ↑ Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Pat Buchanan, Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, Michael Steele, J.D. Hayworth, Steve Lonegan and Tom Coburn; Sharron Angle has been rarely on Fox News, far less than John McCain was, even though Angle's race is far more important than McCain's.
  2. ↑ "Factual accuracy," per Conservapedia's Manual of Style: "The party affiliation of a news source should be irrelevant. All that matters is whether the source has a record of telling the truth."