Difference between revisions of "Army"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀")
m (Reverted edits by Shjt (talk) to last revision by Joaquín Martínez)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀
+
[[Image:British_Infantry1.jpg|right|thumb|300px|British Army [[infantry]] on maneouvres]]
 +
An '''army''' is a group of ground soldiers under the command of a general.  Armies were the main method of combat between [[kingdom|kingdoms]] in the pre-modern era.
 +
 
 +
Much of military strategy in the immediately pre-modern era centered around the question of whether or not it is preferable to maintain a "standing army" - that is, a group of soldiers ready to be "mobilized" at a moment's notice to fight for the country, functioning additionally as deterrence.  Standing armies are exorbitantly expensive to maintain.  Now, most countries maintain a small standing army, but nuclear powers rely on nuclear warheads to maintain deterrence in large part.
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[British Army]]
 +
*[[Israel Defense Forces]]
 +
*[[Red Army]]
 +
*[[United States Army]]
 +
**[[101st Airborne Division]]
 +
**[[United States Army Signal Corps]]
 +
*[[Mechanized infantry]]
 +
*[[Mercenary]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Military]]

Revision as of 16:25, September 13, 2011

British Army infantry on maneouvres

An army is a group of ground soldiers under the command of a general. Armies were the main method of combat between kingdoms in the pre-modern era.

Much of military strategy in the immediately pre-modern era centered around the question of whether or not it is preferable to maintain a "standing army" - that is, a group of soldiers ready to be "mobilized" at a moment's notice to fight for the country, functioning additionally as deterrence. Standing armies are exorbitantly expensive to maintain. Now, most countries maintain a small standing army, but nuclear powers rely on nuclear warheads to maintain deterrence in large part.

See also