Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added another) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|"England's performance at South Africa 2010 was officially their worst at a World Cup finals, according to Fifa."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8814195.stm</ref> | |"England's performance at South Africa 2010 was officially their worst at a World Cup finals, according to Fifa."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8814195.stm</ref> | ||
|July 2010 | |July 2010 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |June 30, 2010 | ||
| + | |In an [[Letter to Douglas Moo|open letter to a leader]] of a new revision to the [[NIV]] [[Bible]], expressing "concern that your Committee might produce a liberal translation that distorts and conceals references to the unborn child in appeasement of the pro-abortion position." | ||
| + | |No response to the letter, and a prior expression of ridicule of the [[Conservapedia Bible Project]] before that. | ||
| + | |The new version [{Feminist Bible|distorts and conceals numerous references]] to the unborn child in the Bible, apparently to appease the pro-abortion position. | ||
| + | |Nov. 1, 2010 (available online)<ref>http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Sept. 19, 2010 | |Sept. 19, 2010 | ||
Revision as of 03:35, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:
| Date | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec. 22, 2008 | the theory of man-made global warming is not verified science, and there is no consensus[1] | "the science is settled" that rapid global warming is somehow occurring | frigid temperatures and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "climate change" | 2011 |
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | Clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | The basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment. | November 2011 |
| mid-June 2010 | Atheistic Britain would embarrass itself in the World Cup[2] | liberal denial shouts down any observation of the correlation between atheism and underachievement | "England's performance at South Africa 2010 was officially their worst at a World Cup finals, according to Fifa."[3] | July 2010 |
| June 30, 2010 | In an open letter to a leader of a new revision to the NIV Bible, expressing "concern that your Committee might produce a liberal translation that distorts and conceals references to the unborn child in appeasement of the pro-abortion position." | No response to the letter, and a prior expression of ridicule of the Conservapedia Bible Project before that. | distorts and conceals numerous references]] to the unborn child in the Bible, apparently to appease the pro-abortion position. | Nov. 1, 2010 (available online)[4] |
| Sept. 19, 2010 | Newt Gingrich is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President[5] | Liberals, preferring Mitt Romney, declare him to be the presumptive nominee | Newt leads in national polls and several key primary states | November 2011 |
| July 2, 2011 | Chris Christie will endorse Mitt Romney for president | Lamestream media insisted that Christie was a contender himself | Chris Christie endorses Mitt Romney for president | Oct. 11, 2011 |
References
- ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227
- ↑ News archives for June 2010.
- ↑ http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8814195.stm
- ↑ http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/
- ↑ http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=819261