Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(prediction about Palin not being the Republican nominee, after seeing how Facebook lost out in the Academy Awards) |
m |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|The [[lamestream media]] continued to promote Palin as a leading contender for more than six months | |The [[lamestream media]] continued to promote Palin as a leading contender for more than six months | ||
|Palin announced she will not be a candidate for the nomination | |Palin announced she will not be a candidate for the nomination | ||
| − | | | + | |October 2011 |
|- | |- | ||
|July 2, 2011 | |July 2, 2011 | ||
Revision as of 05:27, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:
| Date of Conservapedia statement | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec. 22, 2008 | the theory of man-made global warming is not verified science, and there is no consensus[1] | "the science is settled" that rapid global warming is somehow occurring | frigid temperatures and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "climate change" | 2011 |
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | Clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | The basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment. | November 2011 |
| mid-June 2010 | Atheistic Britain would embarrass itself in the World Cup[2] | liberal denial shouts down any observation of the correlation between atheism and underachievement | "England's performance at South Africa 2010 was officially their worst at a World Cup finals, according to Fifa."[3] | July 2010 |
| June 30, 2010 | In an open letter to a leader of a new revision to the NIV Bible, Conservapedia expressed "concern that your Committee might produce a liberal translation that distorts and conceals references to the unborn child in appeasement of the pro-abortion position." | No response to the letter, and a prior expression of ridicule of the Conservapedia Bible Project before that. | distorts and conceals numerous references]] to the unborn child in the Bible, apparently to appease the pro-abortion position. | Nov. 1, 2010 (available online)[4] |
| Sept. 19, 2010 | Newt Gingrich is the most likely to win the Republican nomination for President[5] | Liberals, preferring Mitt Romney, declare him to be the presumptive nominee | Newt leads in national polls and several key primary states | November 2011 |
| Feb. 28, 2011 | Predicted that Sarah Palin will not be the Republican nominee for president, after observing how Facebook (which personified her political approach) lost the [{Academy Award]] to The King's Speech.[6] | The lamestream media continued to promote Palin as a leading contender for more than six months | Palin announced she will not be a candidate for the nomination | October 2011 |
| July 2, 2011 | Chris Christie will endorse Mitt Romney for president | The lamestream media insisted that Christie was a contender himself | Chris Christie made a special endorsement of Mitt Romney for president | Oct. 11, 2011 |
References
- ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227
- ↑ News archives for June 2010.
- ↑ http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8814195.stm
- ↑ http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/
- ↑ http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=819261
- ↑ http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=852880