Difference between revisions of "User talk:Brenden"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Blanked the page)
(Undo revision 988170 by IncidentFBeI (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{welcome|sig=[[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 19:35, 12 May 2012 (EDT)}}
 +
{{Useful links}}
  
 +
The socks which were blocked, including yours, had a single IP, but I will accept your explanation.  Please continue to edit in the site.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:13, 17 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
Greetings from a fellow gay (and very much out and proud!) editor at conservapedia! --[[User:JHunter|JHunter]] 21:13, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
:I'm sorry, wut?
 +
{| class="collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px dashed Gainsboro;margin:+.1em;width:20%"
 +
|-
 +
! style="border:1px solid lightgray;margin:+.1em;text-align:center;padding:+.2em" | <font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="Silver">[[user:Brenden|Brenden]].</font>
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |
 +
*[[Special:Contributions/Brenden|Contribs]]
 +
*[[user talk:Brenden|talk]]
 +
*[[Special:Log&user=Brenden|<font color="blue">log</font>]]
 +
|} 21:44, 24 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== A special thank you ==
 +
 +
Thank you for helping to tag the contributions by [[User:Slaine]] for speedy deletion.  I have blocked the user infinitely.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 17:28, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Quick Thanks ==
 +
 +
Thank you for cleaning up my addition to [[Homosexual Agenda]]. Still learning to get the right 'tone' for articles, much appreciated. [[User:JRegden|JRegden]] 02:57, 11 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== thanks ==
 +
 +
Thank you for adding a category to [[Chomsky hierarchy]]. Perhaps you could have a look at the articles I'm interested in on my [[User talk:RolandPlankton|talk page]] and see if any of these need categorising. [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 18:46, 11 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Marriage Privatization ==
 +
 +
I saw your comment on [[marriage privatization]], but I think you pretty much answered your own question. Take a look at what I wrote. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 18:19, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Thanks ==
 +
 +
Dear Brenden, thanks for joining Conservapedia! Its great to see individuals with diverse views join the encyclopedia in order to help create and improve articles all around. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 19:37, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Thin Ice ==
 +
 +
Keep your grimy hands off my pages before I get one of the admins to kick you to the curb. --[[User:FPhelps|FPhelps]] 00:02, 15 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
:right...[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 00:05, 15 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Your Welcome Message ==
 +
 +
Thanks for the welcome message! Glad to be here! [[User:PCorbett|PCorbett]] 00:56, 24 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== You've got guts Brenden! ==
 +
 +
That's why I recommended you for promotion. Check user rights log! [[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]] 15:08, 9 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Stick to the point==
 +
 +
Brenden, please don't make off-topic [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=984849&oldid=984848 remarks like this]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:47, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
:Eh, I'd rather see it as the Saloon bar style pages of social networking sites.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 19:11, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== ED POOR!!!  ==
 +
 +
Sorry about the all caps, needed to get your attention. By what do you mean, that "refusing sysop direction about talk page use" is a a valid reason for a block? As I said before, sysops are janitors, not the thought police, and dissension was never a blockable reason, at least not in any of the CP commandments. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 12:19, 21 June 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:50, June 21, 2012

Welcome!

Hello, Brenden, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Brenden!


AnupamTalk 19:35, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
Useful links


The socks which were blocked, including yours, had a single IP, but I will accept your explanation. Please continue to edit in the site. Karajou 19:13, 17 April 2012 (EDT)

Greetings from a fellow gay (and very much out and proud!) editor at conservapedia! --JHunter 21:13, 23 April 2012 (EDT)

I'm sorry, wut?

21:44, 24 April 2012 (EDT)

A special thank you

Thank you for helping to tag the contributions by User:Slaine for speedy deletion. I have blocked the user infinitely. GregG 17:28, 29 April 2012 (EDT)

Quick Thanks

Thank you for cleaning up my addition to Homosexual Agenda. Still learning to get the right 'tone' for articles, much appreciated. JRegden 02:57, 11 May 2012 (EDT)

thanks

Thank you for adding a category to Chomsky hierarchy. Perhaps you could have a look at the articles I'm interested in on my talk page and see if any of these need categorising. RolandPlankton 18:46, 11 May 2012 (EDT)

Marriage Privatization

I saw your comment on marriage privatization, but I think you pretty much answered your own question. Take a look at what I wrote. Gregkochuconn 18:19, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Thanks

Dear Brenden, thanks for joining Conservapedia! Its great to see individuals with diverse views join the encyclopedia in order to help create and improve articles all around. With regards, AnupamTalk 19:37, 12 May 2012 (EDT)

Thin Ice

Keep your grimy hands off my pages before I get one of the admins to kick you to the curb. --FPhelps 00:02, 15 May 2012 (EDT)

right...brenden 00:05, 15 May 2012 (EDT)

Your Welcome Message

Thanks for the welcome message! Glad to be here! PCorbett 00:56, 24 May 2012 (EDT)

You've got guts Brenden!

That's why I recommended you for promotion. Check user rights log! EJamesW 15:08, 9 June 2012 (EDT)

Stick to the point

Brenden, please don't make off-topic remarks like this. --Ed Poor Talk 14:47, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

Eh, I'd rather see it as the Saloon bar style pages of social networking sites.brenden 19:11, 12 June 2012 (EDT)

ED POOR!!!

Sorry about the all caps, needed to get your attention. By what do you mean, that "refusing sysop direction about talk page use" is a a valid reason for a block? As I said before, sysops are janitors, not the thought police, and dissension was never a blockable reason, at least not in any of the CP commandments. brenden 12:19, 21 June 2012 (EDT)