Difference between revisions of "User:Ed Poor"
m |
(Use Google to search for ''Ed Poor probation'') |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<small>Archives: [[/archive 01|01]] [[/archive 02|02]] | <small>Archives: [[/archive 01|01]] [[/archive 02|02]] | ||
</small> | </small> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Famous Felon== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use Google to search for ''Ed Poor probation'' | ||
| + | [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ed+Poor+probation] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==New Pages== | ==New Pages== | ||
Revision as of 16:10, April 11, 2007
Famous Felon
Use Google to search for Ed Poor probation [1]
New Pages
These are the last 50 articles I started:
- Right to life movement
- Saline abortion
- Comfort women
- Silent scream
- Speech codes
- Balint Vazsonyi
- Usage
- Theory and fact
- Rastafarianism
- Wiki way
- Red link
- The word
- Getting Better
- Brian Mitchell
- How to write a Conservapedia article
- Unguided evolution
- Fidelity
- Conscientious objector
- National Center for Science Education
- Infrared
- I Have a Dream
- Paul Simon
- Political spectrum
- Infinity
- Equality
- Trawl
- Orbit
- Deduction
- Sit-ins at lunch counters
- Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks
- Diane Ravitch
- George Carlin
- Donkey
- The Manchurian Candidate
- Wolves
- Suffolk Punch
- Manure
- Riders of the Purple Sage
- The Family Man
- Brainwashing
- Frank Sinatra
- To Sir, With Love
- Strider
- Hate
- Methods of contraception
- Fornication
- Idiot
- Ellipse
- Blood type
- The Paradoxical Commandments
- Carbon dioxide
Who do you think you are?
Q: Is this your personal blog, or what?!
A: No, but it just so happens that nearly every word I type, link I create, article or template I start - gains instant and widespread acceptance.
Q: Isn't that a bit arrogant?
A: Okay, I guess you're right. Perhaps I should be more humble.
Explanations
There was a time when Wikipedia was a meritocracy, and I rose rapidly through the ranks then. I got Jimbo to create the Mediation and Arbitration committee's, so he wouldn't have to be the sheriff all the time. I became the first elected bureaucrat, and pioneered the system whereby admins could enforce rules without having to take everything before a committee.
But I didn't see the anti-elitism creeping up and choking the life out of the place. Larry Sanger was right.
My only worry about Conservapedia is that it might make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.