Difference between revisions of "Conversion from atheism to Christianity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Image:Mlogo.jpg|thumbnail|150px|right|The [[Ex-atheists|ex-atheist]] [[Lee Strobel]] converted to Christianity.]] | ||
The abstract of a 2018 academic study performed at the University of South Carolina entitled ''Toward Faith: A Qualitative Study of How [[Atheism|Atheists]] Convert to [[Christianity]]'' published by Joseph Langston indicates: | The abstract of a 2018 academic study performed at the University of South Carolina entitled ''Toward Faith: A Qualitative Study of How [[Atheism|Atheists]] Convert to [[Christianity]]'' published by Joseph Langston indicates: | ||
{{Cquote|The study of religious conversion has historically neglected how nonbelievers (i.e. atheists) come to adopt a belief in a god or gods, and thus cannot address whether findings and theories from previous research apply to atheists. In order to assess how atheists converted to Christianity, we performed a thematic analysis of 111 biographical narratives obtained from the open Internet. Our analysis yielded 10 recurring thematic elements, which we termed as hardship; authentic example; unfamiliarity/pseudo-familiarity (with Christianity or Christians); “contra atheism”; religious study; intellectualism; numinous experiences; openness to experience; ritual behaviors; and social ties. We draw logical connections between these themes and connect them to previous research. Our results impress the need for a more flexible, and therefore less sequential or stage-based, theoretical approach to conversion<ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327078804_Toward_Faith_A_Qualitative_Study_of_How_Atheists_Convert_to_Christianity ''Toward Faith: A Qualitative Study of How Atheists Convert to Christianity''] by Joseph Langston, Researchgate, 2018</ref>}} | {{Cquote|The study of religious conversion has historically neglected how nonbelievers (i.e. atheists) come to adopt a belief in a god or gods, and thus cannot address whether findings and theories from previous research apply to atheists. In order to assess how atheists converted to Christianity, we performed a thematic analysis of 111 biographical narratives obtained from the open Internet. Our analysis yielded 10 recurring thematic elements, which we termed as hardship; authentic example; unfamiliarity/pseudo-familiarity (with Christianity or Christians); “contra atheism”; religious study; intellectualism; numinous experiences; openness to experience; ritual behaviors; and social ties. We draw logical connections between these themes and connect them to previous research. Our results impress the need for a more flexible, and therefore less sequential or stage-based, theoretical approach to conversion<ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327078804_Toward_Faith_A_Qualitative_Study_of_How_Atheists_Convert_to_Christianity ''Toward Faith: A Qualitative Study of How Atheists Convert to Christianity''] by Joseph Langston, Researchgate, 2018</ref>}} | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
'''9.''' Religious Study: extra-Biblical study of Christianity, and of non-Christian religions. | '''9.''' Religious Study: extra-Biblical study of Christianity, and of non-Christian religions. | ||
| − | '''10.''' Contra Atheism: experiencing a sense of “worldviewlessness”, or of being ungrounded in the larger scheme of existence, e.g. existential despair.<ref>[Conversions from Atheism: Ritual Behaviours] by M.S. Pearce</ref>}} | + | '''10.''' Contra Atheism: experiencing a sense of “worldviewlessness”, or of being ungrounded in the larger scheme of existence, e.g. existential despair.<ref>[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/2018/10/21/conversions-from-atheism-ritual-behaviours/ Conversions from Atheism: Ritual Behaviours] by M.S. Pearce</ref>}} |
== See also == | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism vs. Christianity]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and its retention rate in individuals]] | ||
*[[Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian]] | *[[Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Ex-atheists]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Desecularization]] | ||
*[[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] | *[[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] | ||
| − | *[[Argument from experience]] | + | *[[Christian apologetics]] |
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism debates]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and critical thinking]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Argument from religious experience]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheists and church attendance]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and Miracles|Atheism and miracles]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and the supernatural]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and intolerance]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and groupthink]] | ||
*[[Atheist worldview]] | *[[Atheist worldview]] | ||
| Line 36: | Line 61: | ||
*[[Hopelessness of atheism]] | *[[Hopelessness of atheism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism, agnosticism and pessimism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheist deconversion stories]] | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
Latest revision as of 07:59, April 27, 2019
The abstract of a 2018 academic study performed at the University of South Carolina entitled Toward Faith: A Qualitative Study of How Atheists Convert to Christianity published by Joseph Langston indicates:
| “ | The study of religious conversion has historically neglected how nonbelievers (i.e. atheists) come to adopt a belief in a god or gods, and thus cannot address whether findings and theories from previous research apply to atheists. In order to assess how atheists converted to Christianity, we performed a thematic analysis of 111 biographical narratives obtained from the open Internet. Our analysis yielded 10 recurring thematic elements, which we termed as hardship; authentic example; unfamiliarity/pseudo-familiarity (with Christianity or Christians); “contra atheism”; religious study; intellectualism; numinous experiences; openness to experience; ritual behaviors; and social ties. We draw logical connections between these themes and connect them to previous research. Our results impress the need for a more flexible, and therefore less sequential or stage-based, theoretical approach to conversion[1] | ” |
The atheist M.S. Pearce explains the Joseph Langston's themes thusly:
| “ | 1. Ritual Behaviors: prayer, reading the Bible, and attending a Christian church.
2. Intellectualism: use of rationalism, debate, arguments, and critical thinking. 3. Numinous Experiences: often inexplicable and mystical experiences of the divine, i.e. “religious experiences.” 4. Social Ties: social relationships and networks. 5. Hardship: negative life circumstances. 6. Unfamiliarity/Pseudofamiliarity (with Christianity/Christians): self-acknowledged misconceptions or preconceptions based on lack of or low experience, or negative experiences, with Christians and Christianity. 7. Openness to Experience: an attitudinal disposition of willingness to examine different ideas; to be open to another view possibly being true. 8. Authentic Example: finding Christians or Christianity to be inspiring or impressive; axiological or aesthetic influence. 9. Religious Study: extra-Biblical study of Christianity, and of non-Christian religions. 10. Contra Atheism: experiencing a sense of “worldviewlessness”, or of being ungrounded in the larger scheme of existence, e.g. existential despair.[2] |
” |
See also
Notes
- ↑ Toward Faith: A Qualitative Study of How Atheists Convert to Christianity by Joseph Langston, Researchgate, 2018
- ↑ Conversions from Atheism: Ritual Behaviours by M.S. Pearce