Difference between revisions of "Carpetbagger"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Unless readily accessible new instances give even better loot than this, many players would completely ignore them. Raid instances along the way in leveling simply aren't viable, as raids cut experience by half. Further, the only reason guilds can get 40 players to go do Molten Core is because there are many, many 60s in the game, at least when compared to the number of players at exactly, say, level 37. The only sensible thing that I see to do with instances like Zul'Gurub, 20-man Ahn'Qiraj, and Molten Core is to heavily nerf the mobs to make the instances 5-man, raise their levels so that the loot the instance drops is suitable for the level without changing items, reduce drop rates, and remove the raid lockout. That would at least get some utility out of the instances, rather than Blizzard having spent all that time designing instances that even raiders who happen to pick up the game after the expansion can never see. Furthermore, the 40-man component is hardly the only problem with raids in their present formulation. If they were to make the end-game instances 5-man, but keep all the other problems, would that make for a fun instance? Raid lockouts, exotic resistance requirements, prescheduling, regrouping on multiple days, pigeonholed class functions, forced respecs, reputation grinds, DKP, guild drama, and killing the same mobs in the same orders using the same tactics week after week after week in a 5-man instance? No thanks. If that's what it takes, the mobs can keep their epics for all I care. If the problem with the existing raiding end-game is that it's a boring time sink, then what is gained by offering the alternative of another boring time sink? Should a 60 with 100 days /played who still has trouble with Ragefire Chasm get epics just because he's a 60 with 100 days /played? If you got a thousand characters to level 5, would you expect epics for that? Emphasizing time spent over skill leads to mind-numbingly repetitive content, which is exactly what should be avoided. Surely it is better to spend that time creating real content even if it means only one boring end game path instead of several. Perhaps for whatever the final expansion Blizzard has planned, it would make sense to have multiple end-game paths, so that players could advance to the very best gear via 40-man raids, 5-man groups, solo content, or whatever mix they prefer. But in the until then, it doesn't make sense to overdo the end-game content which will need a major overhaul later, instead of real content which will remain useful for as long as the game exists, and without needing to be completely rebalanced. Another alternative would be to have no end-game at all. Put no raid instances or reputation grinds into the game, so that once you finish Stratholme, Scholomance, Dire Maul, Blackrock Depths, and Blackrock Spire, you're done. There's nothing left to do. That would be like Blizzard telling players, congratulations, you have beaten the game. Now you should cancel your account and go do something else. For obvious business reasons, they can't do that. Let's not forget that Blizzard is playing a game too, here. They're trying to make as much money as they possibly can. This isn't an anti-capitalist rant; that's a good thing, not a bad thing. If Blizzard didn't care about money, they wouldn't care what players want, and certainly wouldn't adjust the game based on player demands. If you don't see the difference between this and what they do now, I suggest you go apply for some permit at a government agency sometime. It doesn't matter much which agency, so long as it isn't dependent on customer satisfaction for its budget. Indeed, Blizzard trying to make money is the reason they made the popular level 1-59 section of the game the way they did. Blizzards great insight was that, even if it was necessary for the game to be painful grinding once the content had run out, many players didnt want the painful grinding stage to begin somewhere around level 3. So they postponed it all the way until players had done nearly everything there was to do, and players loved it. That is a big reason why the game has six million or so subscribers, and the company has (hopefully) made millions of dollars in profit. But players see that the grinding can be postponed, and want it postponed further, or put off indefinitely. A company that found a way to do that in a stereotypical MMORPG with heavily scripted content would make oodles of money off it. But trying that is perhaps a holy grail type of mission, and one for which neither Blizzard nor anyone else on the planet has a solution. However, Blizzard knew that they could only add so much real content to the game, without making a bunch of ill-conceived garbage. The problem they faced was how to get players to keep subscribing after they have run out of content, or more commonly, skipped most of it. Their solution was the current raiding end-game. Look carefully, and you'll notice that that is exactly what the existing 40-man raids are built for, more so than to provide an interesting challenge. There is the raid lockout, for example, so that a guild can't kill Onyxia 5 times per day and get everyone his tier 2 helm in a week, but rather, the raid "content" lasts much longer, even after Onyxia goes on farm status. There are the specialized resistance gear requirements, so that players have to spend much time farming for gear which is useless outside the instance in question in order to do the raid. The 40-man requirement itself forces much time to be spent on organizing and trying to build guilds rather than raiding. And the most clever part of this is that if only so much time per week can be spent advancing a "main", it pushes players to create alts, to go back and redo content in a different way with a different class, or perhaps even go do content they skipped the first time around. That is, it pushes players to go do something fun. Imagine that. Doing the same thing over and over and over again for loot is not real content. Forty main raids simply aren't real content in the sense that, say, Scarlet Monastery or Hillsbrad Foothills are. If any raiders want to disagree with that, then would you seriously clear Molten Core a dozen times per character if it dropped no loot, epic or otherwise? Not coincidentally, the same can be said of the various reputation grinds in the game. After all, without epic rewards, players simply wouldn't do a very small subset of the content over and over and over again, even if it's the big bad end boss of the game, as it simply isn't fun. So what about the epics? Doesn't it seem odd that, with the exception of pvp rank 14 weapons (a time sink and a half in itself), all high level epics come from 40-man raids? Well, not really. Blizzard put the "end-game" raids into the game to provide something to do for their less creative players, and prefers that players go raiding rather than canceling accounts. Putting the best loot in the game there ensures that the appropriate type of players will spend the desired amount of time in such instances, and hence keep their subscriptions active. Ill concede that the loot gap between raid and non-raid gear is awfully large and perhaps unnecessarily so; surely item level 60 epics for tier 1 and 67ish for tier 2 would have been high enough to push the players who want the best gear to raid for it. But the point remains that the best gear has to come from the end-game pseudo-content that Blizzard creates solely in an effort to prevent players from cancelling when they rationally ought to. After all, most raiders are there for the epics, not for the challenge. Most won't say so, but many implicitly admit it when they argue that 40-man raids have to give drastically better loot than 5-man instances or else people wouldn't bother to do them. Suppose that there were a "tier 3" legendary set for each class in the game right now. The only way to get it is to press the "q" key once per second for eight hours straight. You can't macro it, and if you take a break for two seconds, you fail and have to start over. Would you do it? Surely you know as well as I do that a lot of players would. Furthermore, if Blizzard later created alternate methods to get comparable gear, there would be an outcry from the people who already had the legendary set of how this was unfair, and the other people who wanted legendaries should have to "earn" their gear by severely damaging their wrists. And yet, at risk of some of the more outspoken raiders not understanding this example, I should hope that it isn't necessary to explain why such a set is spectacularly bad game design. And really, the concept of "earning" gear is quite a preposterous one. You "earn" things by doing something you don't want to do, in order to get something you want. If you aren't fortunate enough to have a job you love, then your job may still be worth doing in order to get enough money to buy an online game subscription--and not starve. For things that need to be done, such exchanges to make doing work worthwhile are quite useful. But this is an online game, played for entertainment. If there are people starving in the world, it's not because your guild took too long to get enough fire resistance gear to take down Ragnaros. Computer games are supposed to be fun. The content along the way, and in particular, the means by which gear is obtained, ought to be fun in itself. To make yourself miserable in order to get epics in a game that you fundamentally hate cannot be "worth it" in any sane sense. It is a rather maddening human tendency that people want epics, regardless of the means by which they are obtained. Raiders often accuse non-raiders of wanting easy epics. Usually they're right. It actually goes further than this, as what many players want is not merely easy epics for themselves, but also for other players to not get easy epics. But raiders want easy epics, too. So I'm not a raider and I don't have any epics. Poor me, right? Well, I had a few but I sold them on the auction house. But really, for what do I need epics? Do I need epics for Stratholme, or Scholomance, or Dire Maul? How about for Silithus, or Winterspring, or Eastern Plaguelands? Of course not. I would need epics for Blackwing Lair or 40-man Ahn'Qiraj, except that I just said I'm not a raider. There are no gear requirements in order not to do an instance. he purpose of getting loot is to be well-equipped for future challenges. But there is only a finite amount of content in the game. At some point, there are no future challenges worth doing--meaning that at that point, loot becomes worthless. Many players have gone past that point without realizing it, and still want more and better epics. You can see them whining about it here every day. So what about pvp? Isn't it unfair if one player is in all blue gear and has to fight another decked out in Blackwing Lair and 40-man Ahn'Qiraj epics? Yep, pvp is unbalanced. Duh. It's supposed to be unbalanced. You should have figured this out by the time you got your first character to level 2. Half the point of the leveling in a leveling game with pvp is to intentionally make the pvp unbalanced. If you don't like that, then don't pvp. Problem solved. It goes back to how players want easy epics for themselves and not for others. Players want to win, and hence want winning to be based on whatever it needs to be based on in order for them to win. For players with more free time than skill, there are leveling games where whoever has the most free time wins. If you're looking for combat where the winner is based on skill, you're terribly lost. Try looking for a game with no concept of experience levels. Blizzard makes pvp unbalanced because that's what players want. They have to deal with that reality in order to make money. As the saying goes, the customer is always right. And that's why complaining about pvp imbalances is stupid. Besides, if Blizzard were to implement all of the nerfs that players have called for when thinking of pvp, it would make much of the pve content horrendously difficult. And that would give players yet another topic on which to whine. What other reasons are there to get epics, apart from pvp and pve uses? Ego, perhaps? While I tend to pity those who make a huge deal about either leveling or getting some particular drop, as though it were some great accomplishment, this doesn't make much sense, either. Suppose that Blizzard were to add a new legendary set for each class which was undeniably the best gear in the game. All that players have to do to get it is upon reaching level 60 is to complete a trivial quest line which basically consists of the quest giver repeatedly asking the player if he is certain that he wants the set. There's one big catch, though: once you get the legendary set, you can never again enter an instance. No battlegrounds, no raid zones, no group zones, no solo farming instances, even. That is, you can get the set, but can't use it much. Interested? If the players who want gear want it for something other than pvp or pve use, then surely this would be quite a popular set, don't you think? I can sympathize with non-raiders who want more non-raiding content added to the game. What I can't sympathize with is the people who use exploits to trivialize (and hence essentially skip) the existing content, and then complain that they've run out of things to do. You've seen what I'm talking about: take a 40 into Deadmines and a 60 into Scarlet Monastery. Such people would take an 80 into Scholomance if they could, but they can't, so instead, they take 10 players into a 5-man zone. And now that exploit is being cut off as well in patch 1.10, and they're screaming about it. Amusing. It's not hard to find the problems with the people you don't like, and raiders have jumped on this to point out how ridiculous it is. They're right, of course. Where they go wrong is in claiming that non-raiders asked for epics for hard non-raiding content and are now complaining about it. The non-raiders who are complaining about the changes of patch 1.10 are not the same people who wanted actual challenges in non-raiding content, such as having to pay attention. So let it be known, I'm not a raider and I don't want easy epics. What I want is to be able to attack one challenge until I get tired of farming it (and I have very little tolerance for grinding of any sort), and then, as a result of having completed the previous challenge (and the ones before it), to be properly equipped for the next. Whether the gear involved is green, blue, purple, or orange doesn't matter much. And I do want the challenges to be, well, challenging, as opposed to monotonous time sinks. I routinely turn players away from groups I form for being too high level. A 56 wants to run Maraudon, or a 38 Razorfen Kraul? Not with me, they won't. Five man caps on five man instances are great. I wish Blizzard would fix the overleveled exploit and not let players more than 10 levels apart enter the same instance together, too. Finally, I want for there to be a next challenge. Even if it's called an expansion. The game doesnt need more time sinks. It needs more real content. Lets let Blizzard create that without getting all antsy in the meantime about not being able to find a boring time sink that isnt, well, a boring time sink.
+
[[File:Carpetbagger1.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Cartoon suggesting President [[Rutherford B. Hayes]] supported removal of carpetbaggers from the Southern States during Reconstruction (''Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper'', 1877.)]]
 +
In United States history, '''carpetbaggers''' were Northerners who moved to the South during [[Reconstruction]] to take up new business, reform or political opportunities. More generally the term refers to the political faction of the [[Republican Party]] in the South controlled by the new arrivals. They were allied politically with [[Freedmen]] (freed slaves), and [[Scalawags]] (Southern whites) in the [[Republican Party]], which in turn controlled ex-Confederate states for varying periods between 1867 and 1877; Carpetbaggers were in power  on average 3 or 4 years except in South Carolina, Louisiana and Florida, where their rule was especially corrupt and lasted about 10 years. They were never in control of Virginia or Tennessee.
 +
 
 +
Since 1900 the term has also been used to describe outsiders attempting to gain political office or economic advantage, especially in areas (thematically or geographically) to which they previously had no connection. Thus in 2000 [[Hillary Clinton]] was called a carpetbagger when she ran for the U.S. senate seat in New York, a state in which she had never lived.<ref>See [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5244/is_/ai_n20688352 online]</ref> Likewise in 1966 [[Robert Kennedy]] was called a carpetbagger when he ran for the New York senate seat.  [[Elizabeth Dole]] had long been absent from North Carolina when she ran for the Senate in 2002 and was elected; the carpetbagger charge was revived in 2008, as she rarely visited the state as Senator, and she was defeated.
 +
 
 +
==Background==
 +
"Carpetbagger" as a term was first used during the [[Reconstruction]] Period following the [[American Civil War]]. Coming down from the northern states were a large number of people who sought to help rebuild the shattered South, yet many of them took advantage of the situation to engage in exploitation and theft.  About 1868 the word "carpetbagger"  - suggesting an exploiter who brings no new resources and probably does not plan to stay - was coined as an epithet against these people, who were identified from the satchels in which they carried all of their possessions; the satchels were made from inexpensive carpeting. The term is now standard and is used without derogatory intent by historians and reference works.
 +
 
 +
===Reform impulse===
 +
 
 +
Many carpetbaggers were reformers, especially those with strong connections to evangelical Protestant churches. Many went as missionaries and school teachers.<ref>''Those Terrible Carpetbaggers'' by Richard Nelson Current. Oxford University Press.1988</ref>  Many were abolitionists who sought to continue the struggle for racial equality; many of these became employees of the federal [[Freedmen's Bureau]], which started operations in 1865 to assist the newly freed blacks. The Bureau established public schools in much of the region. The motivation was the belief that literacy was the key to overthrowing ignorance and inefficiency.<ref>Heather Andrea Williams, ''Self-Taught: African American Education in Slavery and Freedom'' 2006</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Economic motives===
 +
Many carpetbaggers were businessmen who purchased or leased plantations and became wealthy landowners, hiring Freedmen to do the labor. Most were former Union soldiers eager to invest their savings in this promising new frontier, and civilians lured south by press reports of "the fabulous sums of money to be made in the South in raising cotton."  The investors were warmly received.<ref>Foner 1988 pp 137, 194</ref> However, Foner also notes that "joined with the quest for profit, however, was a reforming spirit, a vision of themselves as agents of sectional reconciliation and the South's "economic regeneration." Accustomed to viewing Southerners&mdash;black and white&mdash;as devoid of economic initiative and self-discipline, they believed that only "Northern capital and energy" could bring "the blessings of a free labor system to the region.".<ref>Foner 1988 pp 137</ref> The idea was that "free labor" and "free enterprise" would unleash the economic potential of the South, even as cotton prices were falling and most southern banks had closed.
 +
 
 +
Carpetbaggers tended to be well educated and middle class in origin. Some had been lawyers, businessmen, newspaper editors, and other pillars of Northern communities. The majority (including fifty-two of the sixty who served in Congress during Reconstruction) were veterans of the Union Army.<ref>Foner 1988 pp 294-295</ref>
 +
 
 +
Leading black Carpetbaggers believed the interests of capital and labor identical and that Freedmen needed little more than an "honest chance in the race of life" to prosper.<ref>Foner 1988 pp 289</ref>
 +
 
 +
Most Carpetbaggers and Scalawags shared a modernizing vision of upgrading the Southern economy and society, one that would replace the inefficient Southern plantation regime with railroads, factories, and more efficient farming. They actively promoted public schooling and created numerous colleges and universities. 
 +
====Railroads====
 +
Railroads were especially needed. The southern transportation system had been largely destroyed by the war, and given the large distances only a rail system could build the economic potential. Southern state governments were eager for the investment, and often guaranteed railroad bonds.
 +
 
 +
The Carpetbaggers were especially successful in taking control of Southern railroads, abetted by state legislatures. In 1870, Northerners controlled 21% of the South's railroads (by mileage); 19% of the directors were Carpetbaggers. By 1890, they controlled 88% of the mileage and 47% of the directors were Carpetbaggers.<ref>Klein 1968 p 269</ref>
 +
===Politics===
 +
[[File:Kkk-carpetbagger-cartoon.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A cartoon threatening that the KKK will lynch [[scalawag]]s (left) and carpetbaggers (right) on March 4, 1869, the day President Grant takes office. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Independent Monitor, September 1, 1868. A full-scale scholarly history analyzes the cartoonː Guy W. Hubbs, Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman (2015).<ref>Hubbs, Guy W. (May 15, 2015). [https://books.google.com/books?id=KIVoCQAAQBAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s "Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman"]. University Alabama Press.</ref>]]
 +
A large majority of Carpetbaggers joined the Republican Party coalition in southern states, along with Freedmen, free blacks, and Scalawags (native white southerners). The Republican coalition controlled every state (except Virginia) for a while; they were all overthrown by conservative-Democratic coalitions of [[Redeemers]] in 1870-77.
 +
 
 +
In 1866 about 10,000 to 15,000 of the most prominent Confederate leaders were disenfranchised by Congress (the exact number is unknown). Carpetbaggers often filled the political vacuum and were elected to local, state and national office. Many of them represented railroad and industrial interests and used political power to help those economic interests.
 +
 
 +
By 1870 or even earlier the Scalawags were at odds with the Carpetbaggers inside the Republican coalition, and were increasingly forced out. Blacks, meanwhile, were tiring of white Carpetbagger leadership and demanding more offices for themselves.  The result was deep, bitter internal splits inside the Republicans party of every southern state. The Conservatives (as the opposition called itself), took advantage of the splits by wooing away the Scalawags, leaving the Republicans in a weakened position.
 +
 
 +
==State politics==
 +
===Mississippi===
 +
 
 +
Union General [[Adelbert Ames]], a native of [[Massachusetts]] was the appointed military governor and had himself elected as Republican governor of [[Mississippi]].  Ames tried unsuccessfully to ensure equal rights for black Mississippians. His battles with the Scalawags and African Americans ripped apart his party.<ref>Garner (1902); Harris (1979)</ref>
 +
 
 +
The "Black and Tan" (biracial) constitutional convention in Mississippi in 1868 included 29 Scalawags, 17 blacks and 24 Carpetbaggers, nearly all of whom were veterans of the Union army. They include four who had lived in the South before the war, two of whom had served in the Confederate Army. Among the more prominent were General Beroth B. Eggleston, a native of New York who had enlisted as a private in an Ohio regiment; Colonel A. T. Morgan, of the Second Wisconsin Volunteers; General W. S. Barry, former commander of a Colored regiment raised in Kentucky; an Illinois general and lawyer who graduated from Knox College; Major W. H. Gibbs, of the Fifteenth Illinois infantry; Judge W. B. Cunningham, of Pennsylvania; and Captain E. J. Castello, of the Seventh Missouri infantry. These were among the founders of the Republican party in Mississippi and were prominent in the politics of the state until 1875, but nearly all left Mississippi in 1875-76.<ref>Garner 187-88</ref>
 +
 
 +
Albert T. Morgan, the carpetbagging Republican sheriff of Yazoo, Mississippi, received a brief flurry of national attention when insurgent whites took over the county government and forced him to flee. He later wrote ''Yazoo; Or, on the Picket Line of Freedom in the South'' (1884).
 +
 
 +
On November 6, 1875, [[Hiram Revels]], a Mississippi Republican and the first African American U.S. Senator, wrote a letter to President [[Ulysses S. Grant]] that was widely reprinted. Revels denounced Ames and the Carpetbaggers for manipulating the Black vote for personal benefit, and for keeping alive wartime hatreds:
 +
:  Since reconstruction, the masses of my people have been, as it were, enslaved in mind by unprincipled adventurers, who, caring nothing for country, were willing to stoop to anything no matter how infamous, to secure power to themselves, and perpetuate it..... My people have been told by these schemers, when men have been placed on the ticket who were notoriously corrupt and dishonest, that they must vote for them; that the salvation of the party depended upon it; that the man who scratched a ticket was not a Republican. This is only one of the many means these unprincipled demagogues have devised to perpetuate the intellectual bondage of my people.... The bitterness and hate created by the late civil strife has, in my opinion, been obliterated in this state, except perhaps in some localities, and would have long since been entirely obliterated, were it not for some unprincipled men who would keep alive the bitterness of the past, and inculcate a hatred between the races, in order that they may aggrandize themselves by office, and its emoluments, to control my people, the effect of which is to degrade them.<ref>full text in Garner pp. 399-400</ref>
 +
 
 +
===North Carolina===
 +
 
 +
Corruption was a powerful charge for Democrats in [[North Carolina]], notes historian Paul Escott, "because its truth was apparent."<ref>Escott 160</ref>  For example, General Milton S. Littlefield, dubbed the "Prince of Carpetbaggers," bought votes in the legislature "to support grandiose and fraudulent railroad schemes." Escott concludes that some Democrats were involved, but Republicans "bore the main responsibility for the issue of $28 million in state bonds for railroads and the accompanying corruption. This sum, enormous for the time, aroused great concern." Foner says Littlefield disbursed $200,000 to win support in the legislature for state money for his railroads, and Democrats as well as Republicans were guilty.<ref>Foner 387</ref>  North Carolina Democrats condemned the legislature's "depraved villains, who take bribes every day;" one local Republican officeholder complained, "I deeply regret the course of some of our friends in the Legislature as well as out of it in regard to financial matters, it is very embarrassing indeed."<ref>Escott 160</ref>
 +
 
 +
Extravagance and corruption were inflating taxes and the costs of government in a state that had always favored low expenditure, Escott points out. "Some money went to very worthy causes&mdash;the 1869 legislature, for example, passed a school law that began the rebuilding and expansion of the state's public schools. But far too much was wrongly or unwisely spent," primarily to aid the Republican Party leadership. A Republican county commissioner in Alamance eloquently denounced the situation: "Men are placed in power who instead of carrying out their duties . . . form a kind of school for to graduate Rascals. Yes if you will give them a few Dollars they will liern you for an accomplished Rascal. This is in reference to the taxes that are rung from the laboring class of people. With out a speedy refformation I will have to resign my post."<ref>Escott 160</ref>
 +
 
 +
*[[Albion W. Tourgée]], formerly of Ohio and a friend of President [[James A. Garfield]], was a lawyer and judge in North Carolina. He once claimed that ''"Jesus Christ was a carpetbagger."'' Tourgée later wrote ''A Fool's Errand'', a largely autobiographical novel about an idealistic carpetbagger who is persecuted by the Ku Klux Klan in North Carolina.
 +
 
 +
===South Carolina===
 +
 
 +
The leading carpetbag politician in [[South Carolina]] was [[Daniel Henry Chamberlain]], a New England [[Yankee]] who was an officer in a predominantly black regiment. He served as South Carolina's attorney general from 1868 to 1872 and as Republican governor from 1874 to 1877, losing his office as a result of the [[Compromise of 1877]]. In South Carolina, Chamberlain was a strong supporter of Negro rights, but he later became a white supremacist, a result of his conversion to states' rights, laissez-faire, and evolution. By 1896, liberty meant the right to save oneself from the rising tide of equality. Chamberlain justified white supremacy by arguing that, in evolutionary terms, the Negro obviously belonged to an inferior social order.<ref>Simkins and Woody. (1932)</ref>
 +
 
 +
[[Charles Stearns]], also from Massachusetts, wrote an account of his own carpetbagging in South Carolina: ''The Black Man of the South, and the Rebels: Or, the Characteristics of the Former and the Recent Outrages of the Latter'' (1873).
 +
 
 +
[[Francis L. Cardozo]], a black minister from New Haven, Connecticut, served as a delegate to South Carolina's Constitutional Convention (1868); he made eloquent speeches advocating that the plantations be broken up and distributed among the freedmen.<ref>Simkins and Woody. (1932)</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Louisiana===
 +
 
 +
[[Henry C. Warmoth]], the Republican governor of Louisiana from 1868 to 1874, represents a decidedly less idealistic strand of carpetbagging. As governor, Warmoth was plagued by accusations of corruption that continued long after his death. He supported voting rights for blacks, and at the same time, he used his position as governor to trade in state bonds for his own personal benefit. The newspaper company he owned also had a contract with the state government. Warmoth remained in Louisiana after Reconstruction, and died in 1931 at age 89.<ref>Foner (1968)</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Alabama===
 +
 
 +
George E. Spencer was a prominent U.S. Senator. His 1872 Senate reelection campaign in [[Alabama]] opened him to allegations of "political betrayal of colleagues; manipulation of Federal patronage; embezzlement of public funds; purchase of votes; and intimidation of voters by the presence of Federal troops." He was a major speculator in a distressed financial paper.<ref>Woolfolk (1966); Foner (1968) p 295</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Georgia===
 +
 
 +
Tunis Campbell, a black New York businessman, was hired in 1863 by Secretary of War [[Edwin M. Stanton]] to help former slaves in Port Royal, South Carolina.  When the Civil War ended, Campbell was assigned to the [[Sea Islands]] of Georgia, where he engaged in an apparently successful land reform program for the benefit of the freedmen.  He eventually became vice-chair of the Georgia Republican Party, a state senator, and the head of an African-American militia which he hoped to use against the [[Ku Klux Klan]].<ref>Foner (1968)</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Arkansas===
 +
 
 +
William Hines Furbush, born a slave in Kentucky in 1839, left Ohio, where he received an education, for [[Helena, Arkansas]], in 1862.  Back in Ohio in February 1865, he joined the Forty-second Colored Infantry. After the war, Furbush migrated to [[Liberia]] through the American Colonization Society. He returned to Ohio after 18 months and had moved back to Arkansas by 1870.<ref>Wintory 2004</ref>  Furbush was elected to two terms in the Arkansas House of Representatives, 1873-74 (Phillips County) and 1879-80 (Lee County).  
 +
 
 +
In 1873, following the passage of the state's civil rights law, Furbush&mdash;with three other black leaders, including the bill's primary sponsor, state Senator Richard A. Dawson&mdash;sued a Little Rock barkeeper for refusing the group service. The suit resulted in the only successful Reconstruction prosecution under the state's civil rights law. In the legislature, he worked to create a new county, Lee, from portions of neighboring counties.
 +
 
 +
Following the end of his 1873 legislative term, he was appointed sheriff by Republican Governor Elisha Baxter.  Furbush won reelection as sheriff twice and served from 1873 to 1878. During his term, he adopted a policy of "fusion," a post-Reconstruction power-sharing compromise between Democrats and Republicans. Furbush was originally elected as a Republican but switched to the Democratic Party at the end of his time in the sheriff's office. In 1878, he was again elected to the Arkansas House. His election is noteworthy because he was elected as a black Democrat in an election season notorious for the intimidation of black and Republican voters in black majority eastern Arkansas. Furbush is the first known black Democrat elected to the Arkansas General Assembly.
 +
 
 +
In March 1879, he left Arkansas for [[Colorado]], where he worked as an assayer and barber.  In Bonanza, Colorado, he avoided a lynch mob after shooting and killing a town constable.  In his trial he was acquitted of murder.  He returned to Little Rock, Arkansas, by 1888, following another stay in Ohio. In 1889, he and E. A. Fulton, a fellow black Democrat, announced plans for the ''National Democrat'', a party weekly that was supposed to attract black voters to the Democratic Party. After failing to get black voters in the Democratic Party and with the passage Arkansas's 1891 Election Law that disenfranchised many black voters in the state, Furbush left Arkansas. He traveled to South Carolina and Georgia.  His last stop was in October 1901 at [[Marion, Indiana]]'s National Home for Disabled Veterans.<ref>Foner ''Freedom's Lawmakers"'' p. 79; Wintory 2004, [http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=15 2006]; [http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?search=1&entryID=1790 Daniel Phillips Upham]; [http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?search=1&entryID=94 Gov. Powell Clayton]</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Texas===
 +
 
 +
Carpetbaggers were least visible in Texas. Republicans  were in power from 1867 to January 1874. Only one state official and one justice of the state supreme court was a carpetbagger. About 13%-21% of district court judges were carpetbaggers, along with about 10% of the delegates who wrote the "radical" constitution of 1869. Of the 142 men who served in the 12th legislature, only 12 to 29 were carpetbaggers. At the county level they included about 10% of the commissioners, county judges, and sheriffs.<ref>Campbell (1994)</ref>
 +
 
 +
New Yorker [[George T. Ruby]], was sent by the Freedmen's Bureau to Galveston, Texas, where he settled. As a Texas state senator, Ruby was instrumental in various economic development schemes and in efforts to organize African-American dockworkers into the Labor Union of Colored Men.  When Reconstruction ended, Ruby became a leader of the [[Exoduster]] movement, which encouraged Southern blacks to homestead in Kansas.<ref>Campbell (1994)</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Historiography==
 +
The [[Dunning school]] of American historians (1900-1950) viewed carpetbaggers unfavorably, arguing that they degraded the political and business culture and violated [[republicanism|republican principles]]. The revisionist school in the 1930s called them stooges of Northern business interests. After 1960, the [[neoabolitionist]] school emphasized their moral courage and downplays their corruption or links to railroads.
 +
 
 +
==Bibliography==
 +
 
 +
* Ash, Stephen V. ''When the Yankees Came: Conflict and Chaos in the Occupied South, 1861-1865'' U of North Carolina Press 1995.
 +
*  Barnes, Kenneth C. ''Who Killed John Clayton'' Duke U.P. 1998; violence in Arkansas
 +
* Brown, Canter, Jr. "Carpetbagger Intrigues, Black Leadership, and a Southern Loyalist Triumph: Florida's Gubernatorial Election of 1872" ''Florida Historical Quarterly'' 1994 72(3): 275-301. ISSN 0015-4113. Shows how African Americans joined Redeemers to defeat corrupt carpetbagger running for reelection 
 +
* Campbell, Randolph B. "Carpetbagger Rule in Reconstruction Texas: an Enduring Myth." ''Southwestern Historical Quarterly'' 1994 97(4): 587-596. ISSN 0038-478X
 +
* Richard Nelson Current. ''Those Terrible Carpetbaggers: A Reinterpretation'' (1988), a favorable view
 +
* Currie-Mcdaniel, Ruth. ''Carpetbagger of Conscience: A Biography of John Emory Bryant'' Fordham U.P. 1999; religious reformer in South Carolina
 +
* Durden, Robert Franklin; ''James Shepherd Pike: Republicanism and the American Negro, 1850-1882'' Duke University Press, 1957
 +
* Paul D. Escott; ''Many Excellent People: Power and Privilege in North Carolina, 1850-1900,'' University of North Carolina Press, 1985.
 +
* Foner, Eric. ''Freedom's Lawmakers: A Directory Of Black Officeholders During Reconstruction'', Oxford University Press, 1993, Revised, 1996, LSU Press.
 +
* Foner, Eric. ''Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877'' (1988) Harper & Row, 1988, recent standard history
 +
* Fowler, Wilton B. "A Carpetbagger's Conversion to White Supremacy." ''North Carolina Historical Review'' 1966 43(3): 286-304. ISSN 0029-2494
 +
* Garner, James Wilford. ''Reconstruction in Mississippi'' (1902) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/reconstruction-in-mississippi-by-james-wilford-garner.jsp online edition]
 +
* Harris, William C. ''The Day of the Carpetbagger: Republican Reconstruction in Mississippi'' Louisiana State University Press, 1979 [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-day-of-the-carpetbagger-republican-reconstruction-in-mississippi-by-william-c-harris.jsp online edition]
 +
* Harris, William C. "James Lynch: Black Leader in Southern Reconstruction," ''Historian'' 1971 34(1): 40-61. ISSN 0018-2370; Lynch was Mississippi's first African American secretary of state 
 +
* Klein, Maury. "Southern Railroad Leaders, 1865-1893: Identities and Ideologies" ''Business History Review'' 1968 42(3): 288-310. ISSN 0007-6805 Fulltext in JSTOR
 +
* Morrow, Ralph E.; ''Northern Methodism and Reconstruction'' Michigan State University Press, 1956
 +
* Olsen, Otto H. ''Carpetbagger's Crusade: The Life of Albion Winegar Tourgee'' (1965)
 +
* Simkins, Francis Butler, and Robert Hilliard Woody. ''South Carolina during Reconstruction'' (1932)
 +
* Tunnell, Ted. ''Edge of the Sword: The Ordeal of Carpetbagger Marshall H. Twitchell in the Civil War and Reconstruction'' LSU Press, 2001, on Louisiana.
 +
* Ted Tunnell, "Creating 'the Propaganda of History': Southern Editors and the Origins of Carpetbagger and Scalawag," ''Journal of Southern History'' (Nov 2006) 72#4
 +
* Wiggins, Sarah Woolfolk; ''The Scalawag in Alabama Politics, 1865-1881'' University of Alabama Press, 1991 [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-scalawag-in-alabama-politics-1865-1881-by-sarah-woolfolk-wiggins.jsp online edition]
 +
* Woolfolk, Sarah Van V. "George E. Spencer: a Carpetbagger in Alabama," ''Alabama Review'' 1966 19(1): 41-52. ISSN 0002-4341
 +
* Wintory, Blake. "William Hines Furbush: African-American Carpetbagger, Republican, Fusionist, and Democrat," ''Arkansas Historical Quarterly'' 2004 63(2): 107-165. ISSN 0004-1823
 +
* [http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=15 Wintory, Blake. "William Hines Furbush (1839–1902)" ''Encyclopedia of Arkansas History & Culture'' (2006).]
 +
===Primary sources===
 +
* Bryant, Emma Spaulding.  ''Emma Spaulding Bryant: Civil War Bride, Carpetbagger's Wife, Ardent Feminist; Letters and Diaries, 1860-1900'' Fordham U. Pr., 2004. 503 pp.
 +
* [[Fleming, Walter L.]] ''Documentary History of Reconstruction: Political, Military, Social, Religious, Educational, and Industrial'' 2 vol (1906). Uses broad collection of primary sources; vol 1 on national politics; vol 2 on states; [https://books.google.com/books?vid=0OnNK8pM92WrjQK2ijCaciu&id=yukLAAAAIAAJ&printsec=toc&dq=%22Documentary+History+of+Reconstruction%22&sig=KbFxeYrtnbJAFZRBvK_rApDguQg#PPR11,M1 volume 1 493 pp online] and [https://books.google.com/books?vid=0lH-_oan672uKoftngo_tzc&id=beoLAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA305&lpg=PA305&dq=documentary+plantation&as_brr=1#PPR7,M1 vol 2 480 pp online]
 +
* Post, Louis F. "A 'Carpetbagger' in South Carolina," ''The Journal of Negro History'' Vol. 10, No. 1 (Jan., 1925), pp.&nbsp;10–79 in Jstor; autobiography
 +
* Twitchell, Marshall Harvey. ''Carpetbagger from Vermont: The Autobiography of Marshall Harvey Twitchell.'' ed by Ted Tunnell; Louisiana State U. Press, 1989. 216 pp.
 +
 
 +
====notes====
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Reconstruction]]
 +
[[Category:United States History]]

Latest revision as of 01:15, February 22, 2019

Cartoon suggesting President Rutherford B. Hayes supported removal of carpetbaggers from the Southern States during Reconstruction (Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper, 1877.)

In United States history, carpetbaggers were Northerners who moved to the South during Reconstruction to take up new business, reform or political opportunities. More generally the term refers to the political faction of the Republican Party in the South controlled by the new arrivals. They were allied politically with Freedmen (freed slaves), and Scalawags (Southern whites) in the Republican Party, which in turn controlled ex-Confederate states for varying periods between 1867 and 1877; Carpetbaggers were in power on average 3 or 4 years except in South Carolina, Louisiana and Florida, where their rule was especially corrupt and lasted about 10 years. They were never in control of Virginia or Tennessee.

Since 1900 the term has also been used to describe outsiders attempting to gain political office or economic advantage, especially in areas (thematically or geographically) to which they previously had no connection. Thus in 2000 Hillary Clinton was called a carpetbagger when she ran for the U.S. senate seat in New York, a state in which she had never lived.[1] Likewise in 1966 Robert Kennedy was called a carpetbagger when he ran for the New York senate seat. Elizabeth Dole had long been absent from North Carolina when she ran for the Senate in 2002 and was elected; the carpetbagger charge was revived in 2008, as she rarely visited the state as Senator, and she was defeated.

Background

"Carpetbagger" as a term was first used during the Reconstruction Period following the American Civil War. Coming down from the northern states were a large number of people who sought to help rebuild the shattered South, yet many of them took advantage of the situation to engage in exploitation and theft. About 1868 the word "carpetbagger" - suggesting an exploiter who brings no new resources and probably does not plan to stay - was coined as an epithet against these people, who were identified from the satchels in which they carried all of their possessions; the satchels were made from inexpensive carpeting. The term is now standard and is used without derogatory intent by historians and reference works.

Reform impulse

Many carpetbaggers were reformers, especially those with strong connections to evangelical Protestant churches. Many went as missionaries and school teachers.[2] Many were abolitionists who sought to continue the struggle for racial equality; many of these became employees of the federal Freedmen's Bureau, which started operations in 1865 to assist the newly freed blacks. The Bureau established public schools in much of the region. The motivation was the belief that literacy was the key to overthrowing ignorance and inefficiency.[3]

Economic motives

Many carpetbaggers were businessmen who purchased or leased plantations and became wealthy landowners, hiring Freedmen to do the labor. Most were former Union soldiers eager to invest their savings in this promising new frontier, and civilians lured south by press reports of "the fabulous sums of money to be made in the South in raising cotton." The investors were warmly received.[4] However, Foner also notes that "joined with the quest for profit, however, was a reforming spirit, a vision of themselves as agents of sectional reconciliation and the South's "economic regeneration." Accustomed to viewing Southerners—black and white—as devoid of economic initiative and self-discipline, they believed that only "Northern capital and energy" could bring "the blessings of a free labor system to the region.".[5] The idea was that "free labor" and "free enterprise" would unleash the economic potential of the South, even as cotton prices were falling and most southern banks had closed.

Carpetbaggers tended to be well educated and middle class in origin. Some had been lawyers, businessmen, newspaper editors, and other pillars of Northern communities. The majority (including fifty-two of the sixty who served in Congress during Reconstruction) were veterans of the Union Army.[6]

Leading black Carpetbaggers believed the interests of capital and labor identical and that Freedmen needed little more than an "honest chance in the race of life" to prosper.[7]

Most Carpetbaggers and Scalawags shared a modernizing vision of upgrading the Southern economy and society, one that would replace the inefficient Southern plantation regime with railroads, factories, and more efficient farming. They actively promoted public schooling and created numerous colleges and universities.

Railroads

Railroads were especially needed. The southern transportation system had been largely destroyed by the war, and given the large distances only a rail system could build the economic potential. Southern state governments were eager for the investment, and often guaranteed railroad bonds.

The Carpetbaggers were especially successful in taking control of Southern railroads, abetted by state legislatures. In 1870, Northerners controlled 21% of the South's railroads (by mileage); 19% of the directors were Carpetbaggers. By 1890, they controlled 88% of the mileage and 47% of the directors were Carpetbaggers.[8]

Politics

 
A cartoon threatening that the KKK will lynch scalawags (left) and carpetbaggers (right) on March 4, 1869, the day President Grant takes office. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Independent Monitor, September 1, 1868. A full-scale scholarly history analyzes the cartoonː Guy W. Hubbs, Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman (2015).[9]

A large majority of Carpetbaggers joined the Republican Party coalition in southern states, along with Freedmen, free blacks, and Scalawags (native white southerners). The Republican coalition controlled every state (except Virginia) for a while; they were all overthrown by conservative-Democratic coalitions of Redeemers in 1870-77.

In 1866 about 10,000 to 15,000 of the most prominent Confederate leaders were disenfranchised by Congress (the exact number is unknown). Carpetbaggers often filled the political vacuum and were elected to local, state and national office. Many of them represented railroad and industrial interests and used political power to help those economic interests.

By 1870 or even earlier the Scalawags were at odds with the Carpetbaggers inside the Republican coalition, and were increasingly forced out. Blacks, meanwhile, were tiring of white Carpetbagger leadership and demanding more offices for themselves. The result was deep, bitter internal splits inside the Republicans party of every southern state. The Conservatives (as the opposition called itself), took advantage of the splits by wooing away the Scalawags, leaving the Republicans in a weakened position.

State politics

Mississippi

Union General Adelbert Ames, a native of Massachusetts was the appointed military governor and had himself elected as Republican governor of Mississippi. Ames tried unsuccessfully to ensure equal rights for black Mississippians. His battles with the Scalawags and African Americans ripped apart his party.[10]

The "Black and Tan" (biracial) constitutional convention in Mississippi in 1868 included 29 Scalawags, 17 blacks and 24 Carpetbaggers, nearly all of whom were veterans of the Union army. They include four who had lived in the South before the war, two of whom had served in the Confederate Army. Among the more prominent were General Beroth B. Eggleston, a native of New York who had enlisted as a private in an Ohio regiment; Colonel A. T. Morgan, of the Second Wisconsin Volunteers; General W. S. Barry, former commander of a Colored regiment raised in Kentucky; an Illinois general and lawyer who graduated from Knox College; Major W. H. Gibbs, of the Fifteenth Illinois infantry; Judge W. B. Cunningham, of Pennsylvania; and Captain E. J. Castello, of the Seventh Missouri infantry. These were among the founders of the Republican party in Mississippi and were prominent in the politics of the state until 1875, but nearly all left Mississippi in 1875-76.[11]

Albert T. Morgan, the carpetbagging Republican sheriff of Yazoo, Mississippi, received a brief flurry of national attention when insurgent whites took over the county government and forced him to flee. He later wrote Yazoo; Or, on the Picket Line of Freedom in the South (1884).

On November 6, 1875, Hiram Revels, a Mississippi Republican and the first African American U.S. Senator, wrote a letter to President Ulysses S. Grant that was widely reprinted. Revels denounced Ames and the Carpetbaggers for manipulating the Black vote for personal benefit, and for keeping alive wartime hatreds:

Since reconstruction, the masses of my people have been, as it were, enslaved in mind by unprincipled adventurers, who, caring nothing for country, were willing to stoop to anything no matter how infamous, to secure power to themselves, and perpetuate it..... My people have been told by these schemers, when men have been placed on the ticket who were notoriously corrupt and dishonest, that they must vote for them; that the salvation of the party depended upon it; that the man who scratched a ticket was not a Republican. This is only one of the many means these unprincipled demagogues have devised to perpetuate the intellectual bondage of my people.... The bitterness and hate created by the late civil strife has, in my opinion, been obliterated in this state, except perhaps in some localities, and would have long since been entirely obliterated, were it not for some unprincipled men who would keep alive the bitterness of the past, and inculcate a hatred between the races, in order that they may aggrandize themselves by office, and its emoluments, to control my people, the effect of which is to degrade them.[12]

North Carolina

Corruption was a powerful charge for Democrats in North Carolina, notes historian Paul Escott, "because its truth was apparent."[13] For example, General Milton S. Littlefield, dubbed the "Prince of Carpetbaggers," bought votes in the legislature "to support grandiose and fraudulent railroad schemes." Escott concludes that some Democrats were involved, but Republicans "bore the main responsibility for the issue of $28 million in state bonds for railroads and the accompanying corruption. This sum, enormous for the time, aroused great concern." Foner says Littlefield disbursed $200,000 to win support in the legislature for state money for his railroads, and Democrats as well as Republicans were guilty.[14] North Carolina Democrats condemned the legislature's "depraved villains, who take bribes every day;" one local Republican officeholder complained, "I deeply regret the course of some of our friends in the Legislature as well as out of it in regard to financial matters, it is very embarrassing indeed."[15]

Extravagance and corruption were inflating taxes and the costs of government in a state that had always favored low expenditure, Escott points out. "Some money went to very worthy causes—the 1869 legislature, for example, passed a school law that began the rebuilding and expansion of the state's public schools. But far too much was wrongly or unwisely spent," primarily to aid the Republican Party leadership. A Republican county commissioner in Alamance eloquently denounced the situation: "Men are placed in power who instead of carrying out their duties . . . form a kind of school for to graduate Rascals. Yes if you will give them a few Dollars they will liern you for an accomplished Rascal. This is in reference to the taxes that are rung from the laboring class of people. With out a speedy refformation I will have to resign my post."[16]

  • Albion W. Tourgée, formerly of Ohio and a friend of President James A. Garfield, was a lawyer and judge in North Carolina. He once claimed that "Jesus Christ was a carpetbagger." Tourgée later wrote A Fool's Errand, a largely autobiographical novel about an idealistic carpetbagger who is persecuted by the Ku Klux Klan in North Carolina.

South Carolina

The leading carpetbag politician in South Carolina was Daniel Henry Chamberlain, a New England Yankee who was an officer in a predominantly black regiment. He served as South Carolina's attorney general from 1868 to 1872 and as Republican governor from 1874 to 1877, losing his office as a result of the Compromise of 1877. In South Carolina, Chamberlain was a strong supporter of Negro rights, but he later became a white supremacist, a result of his conversion to states' rights, laissez-faire, and evolution. By 1896, liberty meant the right to save oneself from the rising tide of equality. Chamberlain justified white supremacy by arguing that, in evolutionary terms, the Negro obviously belonged to an inferior social order.[17]

Charles Stearns, also from Massachusetts, wrote an account of his own carpetbagging in South Carolina: The Black Man of the South, and the Rebels: Or, the Characteristics of the Former and the Recent Outrages of the Latter (1873).

Francis L. Cardozo, a black minister from New Haven, Connecticut, served as a delegate to South Carolina's Constitutional Convention (1868); he made eloquent speeches advocating that the plantations be broken up and distributed among the freedmen.[18]

Louisiana

Henry C. Warmoth, the Republican governor of Louisiana from 1868 to 1874, represents a decidedly less idealistic strand of carpetbagging. As governor, Warmoth was plagued by accusations of corruption that continued long after his death. He supported voting rights for blacks, and at the same time, he used his position as governor to trade in state bonds for his own personal benefit. The newspaper company he owned also had a contract with the state government. Warmoth remained in Louisiana after Reconstruction, and died in 1931 at age 89.[19]

Alabama

George E. Spencer was a prominent U.S. Senator. His 1872 Senate reelection campaign in Alabama opened him to allegations of "political betrayal of colleagues; manipulation of Federal patronage; embezzlement of public funds; purchase of votes; and intimidation of voters by the presence of Federal troops." He was a major speculator in a distressed financial paper.[20]

Georgia

Tunis Campbell, a black New York businessman, was hired in 1863 by Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton to help former slaves in Port Royal, South Carolina. When the Civil War ended, Campbell was assigned to the Sea Islands of Georgia, where he engaged in an apparently successful land reform program for the benefit of the freedmen. He eventually became vice-chair of the Georgia Republican Party, a state senator, and the head of an African-American militia which he hoped to use against the Ku Klux Klan.[21]

Arkansas

William Hines Furbush, born a slave in Kentucky in 1839, left Ohio, where he received an education, for Helena, Arkansas, in 1862. Back in Ohio in February 1865, he joined the Forty-second Colored Infantry. After the war, Furbush migrated to Liberia through the American Colonization Society. He returned to Ohio after 18 months and had moved back to Arkansas by 1870.[22] Furbush was elected to two terms in the Arkansas House of Representatives, 1873-74 (Phillips County) and 1879-80 (Lee County).

In 1873, following the passage of the state's civil rights law, Furbush—with three other black leaders, including the bill's primary sponsor, state Senator Richard A. Dawson—sued a Little Rock barkeeper for refusing the group service. The suit resulted in the only successful Reconstruction prosecution under the state's civil rights law. In the legislature, he worked to create a new county, Lee, from portions of neighboring counties.

Following the end of his 1873 legislative term, he was appointed sheriff by Republican Governor Elisha Baxter. Furbush won reelection as sheriff twice and served from 1873 to 1878. During his term, he adopted a policy of "fusion," a post-Reconstruction power-sharing compromise between Democrats and Republicans. Furbush was originally elected as a Republican but switched to the Democratic Party at the end of his time in the sheriff's office. In 1878, he was again elected to the Arkansas House. His election is noteworthy because he was elected as a black Democrat in an election season notorious for the intimidation of black and Republican voters in black majority eastern Arkansas. Furbush is the first known black Democrat elected to the Arkansas General Assembly.

In March 1879, he left Arkansas for Colorado, where he worked as an assayer and barber. In Bonanza, Colorado, he avoided a lynch mob after shooting and killing a town constable. In his trial he was acquitted of murder. He returned to Little Rock, Arkansas, by 1888, following another stay in Ohio. In 1889, he and E. A. Fulton, a fellow black Democrat, announced plans for the National Democrat, a party weekly that was supposed to attract black voters to the Democratic Party. After failing to get black voters in the Democratic Party and with the passage Arkansas's 1891 Election Law that disenfranchised many black voters in the state, Furbush left Arkansas. He traveled to South Carolina and Georgia. His last stop was in October 1901 at Marion, Indiana's National Home for Disabled Veterans.[23]

Texas

Carpetbaggers were least visible in Texas. Republicans were in power from 1867 to January 1874. Only one state official and one justice of the state supreme court was a carpetbagger. About 13%-21% of district court judges were carpetbaggers, along with about 10% of the delegates who wrote the "radical" constitution of 1869. Of the 142 men who served in the 12th legislature, only 12 to 29 were carpetbaggers. At the county level they included about 10% of the commissioners, county judges, and sheriffs.[24]

New Yorker George T. Ruby, was sent by the Freedmen's Bureau to Galveston, Texas, where he settled. As a Texas state senator, Ruby was instrumental in various economic development schemes and in efforts to organize African-American dockworkers into the Labor Union of Colored Men. When Reconstruction ended, Ruby became a leader of the Exoduster movement, which encouraged Southern blacks to homestead in Kansas.[25]

Historiography

The Dunning school of American historians (1900-1950) viewed carpetbaggers unfavorably, arguing that they degraded the political and business culture and violated republican principles. The revisionist school in the 1930s called them stooges of Northern business interests. After 1960, the neoabolitionist school emphasized their moral courage and downplays their corruption or links to railroads.

Bibliography

  • Ash, Stephen V. When the Yankees Came: Conflict and Chaos in the Occupied South, 1861-1865 U of North Carolina Press 1995.
  • Barnes, Kenneth C. Who Killed John Clayton Duke U.P. 1998; violence in Arkansas
  • Brown, Canter, Jr. "Carpetbagger Intrigues, Black Leadership, and a Southern Loyalist Triumph: Florida's Gubernatorial Election of 1872" Florida Historical Quarterly 1994 72(3): 275-301. ISSN 0015-4113. Shows how African Americans joined Redeemers to defeat corrupt carpetbagger running for reelection
  • Campbell, Randolph B. "Carpetbagger Rule in Reconstruction Texas: an Enduring Myth." Southwestern Historical Quarterly 1994 97(4): 587-596. ISSN 0038-478X
  • Richard Nelson Current. Those Terrible Carpetbaggers: A Reinterpretation (1988), a favorable view
  • Currie-Mcdaniel, Ruth. Carpetbagger of Conscience: A Biography of John Emory Bryant Fordham U.P. 1999; religious reformer in South Carolina
  • Durden, Robert Franklin; James Shepherd Pike: Republicanism and the American Negro, 1850-1882 Duke University Press, 1957
  • Paul D. Escott; Many Excellent People: Power and Privilege in North Carolina, 1850-1900, University of North Carolina Press, 1985.
  • Foner, Eric. Freedom's Lawmakers: A Directory Of Black Officeholders During Reconstruction, Oxford University Press, 1993, Revised, 1996, LSU Press.
  • Foner, Eric. Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 (1988) Harper & Row, 1988, recent standard history
  • Fowler, Wilton B. "A Carpetbagger's Conversion to White Supremacy." North Carolina Historical Review 1966 43(3): 286-304. ISSN 0029-2494
  • Garner, James Wilford. Reconstruction in Mississippi (1902) online edition
  • Harris, William C. The Day of the Carpetbagger: Republican Reconstruction in Mississippi Louisiana State University Press, 1979 online edition
  • Harris, William C. "James Lynch: Black Leader in Southern Reconstruction," Historian 1971 34(1): 40-61. ISSN 0018-2370; Lynch was Mississippi's first African American secretary of state
  • Klein, Maury. "Southern Railroad Leaders, 1865-1893: Identities and Ideologies" Business History Review 1968 42(3): 288-310. ISSN 0007-6805 Fulltext in JSTOR
  • Morrow, Ralph E.; Northern Methodism and Reconstruction Michigan State University Press, 1956
  • Olsen, Otto H. Carpetbagger's Crusade: The Life of Albion Winegar Tourgee (1965)
  • Simkins, Francis Butler, and Robert Hilliard Woody. South Carolina during Reconstruction (1932)
  • Tunnell, Ted. Edge of the Sword: The Ordeal of Carpetbagger Marshall H. Twitchell in the Civil War and Reconstruction LSU Press, 2001, on Louisiana.
  • Ted Tunnell, "Creating 'the Propaganda of History': Southern Editors and the Origins of Carpetbagger and Scalawag," Journal of Southern History (Nov 2006) 72#4
  • Wiggins, Sarah Woolfolk; The Scalawag in Alabama Politics, 1865-1881 University of Alabama Press, 1991 online edition
  • Woolfolk, Sarah Van V. "George E. Spencer: a Carpetbagger in Alabama," Alabama Review 1966 19(1): 41-52. ISSN 0002-4341
  • Wintory, Blake. "William Hines Furbush: African-American Carpetbagger, Republican, Fusionist, and Democrat," Arkansas Historical Quarterly 2004 63(2): 107-165. ISSN 0004-1823
  • Wintory, Blake. "William Hines Furbush (1839–1902)" Encyclopedia of Arkansas History & Culture (2006).

Primary sources

  • Bryant, Emma Spaulding. Emma Spaulding Bryant: Civil War Bride, Carpetbagger's Wife, Ardent Feminist; Letters and Diaries, 1860-1900 Fordham U. Pr., 2004. 503 pp.
  • Fleming, Walter L. Documentary History of Reconstruction: Political, Military, Social, Religious, Educational, and Industrial 2 vol (1906). Uses broad collection of primary sources; vol 1 on national politics; vol 2 on states; volume 1 493 pp online and vol 2 480 pp online
  • Post, Louis F. "A 'Carpetbagger' in South Carolina," The Journal of Negro History Vol. 10, No. 1 (Jan., 1925), pp. 10–79 in Jstor; autobiography
  • Twitchell, Marshall Harvey. Carpetbagger from Vermont: The Autobiography of Marshall Harvey Twitchell. ed by Ted Tunnell; Louisiana State U. Press, 1989. 216 pp.

notes

  1. ↑ See online
  2. ↑ Those Terrible Carpetbaggers by Richard Nelson Current. Oxford University Press.1988
  3. ↑ Heather Andrea Williams, Self-Taught: African American Education in Slavery and Freedom 2006
  4. ↑ Foner 1988 pp 137, 194
  5. ↑ Foner 1988 pp 137
  6. ↑ Foner 1988 pp 294-295
  7. ↑ Foner 1988 pp 289
  8. ↑ Klein 1968 p 269
  9. ↑ Hubbs, Guy W. (May 15, 2015). "Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman". University Alabama Press.
  10. ↑ Garner (1902); Harris (1979)
  11. ↑ Garner 187-88
  12. ↑ full text in Garner pp. 399-400
  13. ↑ Escott 160
  14. ↑ Foner 387
  15. ↑ Escott 160
  16. ↑ Escott 160
  17. ↑ Simkins and Woody. (1932)
  18. ↑ Simkins and Woody. (1932)
  19. ↑ Foner (1968)
  20. ↑ Woolfolk (1966); Foner (1968) p 295
  21. ↑ Foner (1968)
  22. ↑ Wintory 2004
  23. ↑ Foner Freedom's Lawmakers" p. 79; Wintory 2004, 2006; Daniel Phillips Upham; Gov. Powell Clayton
  24. ↑ Campbell (1994)
  25. ↑ Campbell (1994)