Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎"Through natural processes alone" vs. "Darwinism": Darwinism is taught and believed without any "supernatural" intervention.)
 
 
(256 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
 
 
==Student Panel's Decision==
 
After much debate, the Conservapedia Panel has finished reviewing the Theory of Evolution page. We have determined that the article will remain protected indefinitely, to protect it from inevitable vandalism.  We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution.  Those who wish to assist in improving this article should submit proposed changes to the panel for review.  We also realize the article is in need of revisions to areas containing problems with grammar and style and appreciate your help correcting this. The Panel apologizes for the long delay in this decision. Thank you for your patience.  Please submit any further issues to the panel at [[User talk:CPanel]], and we will do our best to resolve them.
 
 
Sincerely,<br />
 
The Conservapedia Student Panel --[[User:CPanel]]
 
 
 
 
The Panel regarding a concise definition of the theory of evolution:
 
 
:The article has been improved significantly since we began working on this issue.  Some of the Panel may not be aware of these changes.  They have been contacted, and after they give their opinions, we will post the results here. ~ [[User:CPanel|CPanel]] 18:41, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
</blockquote>
 
 
{| align=right border=2 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 3px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;"
 
{| align=right border=2 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 3px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;"
 
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_2|Set 2 of Archives]]
 
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_2|Set 2 of Archives]]
Line 19: Line 5:
 
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_1|Set 1 of Archives]]
 
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_1|Set 1 of Archives]]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
 +
== Strong indicators that 2014 will be a bad year for  Darwinism and atheism ==
  
 +
Indicators that 2014 will be a bad year for Darwinism and atheism: [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/12/surefire-signs-that-2014-will-be-worst.html Surefire signs that 2014 will be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism and atheism] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 06:12, 18 December 2013 (EST)
  
 +
==[[Robert Skildelsky]]==
 +
[[User:Conservative]]]: You used a source on these major Portal pages: [[Charles Darwin]], [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], [[John Maynard Keynes]] and [[Evolution]] ([https://www.jordantimes.com/opinion/robert-skidelsky/costly-return-geopolitics The costly return of geopolitics], Jun 27, 2023). His latest, [https://youtu.be/ALnyAWz5l8I Lord Robert Skidelsky: Pax-Americana is Over], seems to directly contradict your [[Essay: The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future]], who declares it has ended. To avoid the confusion you have created on the part of our readers between your ideas and Skildelsky, why don't you properly qualify the source by creating the [[Robert Skildelsky]] article? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 13:23, April 20, 2025 (EDT)
  
__TOC__
+
== Alfred Russel Wallace - Co-discoverer of natural selection ==
 
 
== Theory? ==
 
 
 
Evolution is most certainly a fact. --[[User:TheSensei|TheSensei]] 21:51, 22 February 2011 (EST)
 
:This is what's called an argument by assertion. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:53, 22 February 2011 (EST)
 
 
 
:A "fact" ... just like the "fact" of [[global warming]]?  Sorry, declaring something a fact does not make it so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:04, 22 February 2011 (EST)
 
 
 
== "Through natural processes alone" vs. "Darwinism" ==
 
 
 
In the article's third paragraph, I noticed an incorrect assertion based on the results of a poll. The article states that "60% of American medical doctors reject Darwinism, stating that they do not believe man evolved through natural processes alone." Just because someone believes that man did not evolve 100% naturally (evolution), doesn't mean that they believe evolution was 100% supernatural. It is possible that they could believe in both Darwinism and intelligent design. [[User:JimAB|JimAB]] 21:40, 4 April 2011 (EDT)
 
  
:Darwinism is taught and believed without any "supernatural" intervention.  Also, Darwinism directly conflicts with basic [[Christian]] principles, such as [[Jesus]] redeeming the original sin of [[Adam]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:56, 5 April 2011 (EDT)
+
Hello, I cannot edit this page, but is there a way to add "Alfred Russel Wallace who was the co-discoverer of natural selection, eventually came to see that nature exhibited design and purpose with evolution." citation: Alfred Russel Wallace. 1911. "The World of Life: A Manifestation of Creative Power, Directive Mind and Ultimate Purpose" It summarizes his view of natural history, evolution, natural selection, and their intersection with design. His work shows that nature and design are not mutually exclusive.
 +
:I removed the protection from the page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:00, August 25, 2025 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 14:00, August 25, 2025

Set 2 of Archives
Set 1 of Archives







Strong indicators that 2014 will be a bad year for Darwinism and atheism

Indicators that 2014 will be a bad year for Darwinism and atheism: Surefire signs that 2014 will be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism and atheism Conservative 06:12, 18 December 2013 (EST)

Robert Skildelsky

User:Conservative]: You used a source on these major Portal pages: Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, John Maynard Keynes and Evolution (The costly return of geopolitics, Jun 27, 2023). His latest, Lord Robert Skidelsky: Pax-Americana is Over, seems to directly contradict your Essay: The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future, who declares it has ended. To avoid the confusion you have created on the part of our readers between your ideas and Skildelsky, why don't you properly qualify the source by creating the Robert Skildelsky article? RobSZelensky Must Go! 13:23, April 20, 2025 (EDT)

Alfred Russel Wallace - Co-discoverer of natural selection

Hello, I cannot edit this page, but is there a way to add "Alfred Russel Wallace who was the co-discoverer of natural selection, eventually came to see that nature exhibited design and purpose with evolution." citation: Alfred Russel Wallace. 1911. "The World of Life: A Manifestation of Creative Power, Directive Mind and Ultimate Purpose" It summarizes his view of natural history, evolution, natural selection, and their intersection with design. His work shows that nature and design are not mutually exclusive.

I removed the protection from the page. Conservative (talk) 10:00, August 25, 2025 (EDT)