Changes

413 bytes added ,  00:27, August 26, 2012
Line 38: Line 38:  
:#Do not say no reason was given for a revert, when one was given.
 
:#Do not say no reason was given for a revert, when one was given.
 
:You are allowed to disagree about how to write an article, but you're not allowed to make up fictions. First, last, and only warning. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:06, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
 
:You are allowed to disagree about how to write an article, but you're not allowed to make up fictions. First, last, and only warning. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:06, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
::Sure AcomaMagic shouldn't have removed the reference from the intro, but to be fair, Mr. Poor, no reason for revert was given before his/her first and only edits to this article. Those were his/her first two mainspace edits, so maybe people are being overly harsh. Or is Conservapedia no longer assuming good faith or trying to be a welcoming community? --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 20:27, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
96

edits