Changes

== Future changes ==

== Future changes ==

After nearly three decades from its beginning and after losing more than $2 billion, 'The Washington Times'' announced on December 2009 that they are laying-off at least 40 percent of its staff and will shift to mainly free distribution.  Billed as a conservative alternative to the ''[[Washington Post]]'', the paper's recent circulation was at about 85,000 compared to the ''Post's'' 583,000. The main focus of '''The Times''' has shifted to a national audience on local coverage will be deemphasized.<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120203295.html</ref>

After nearly three decades from its beginning and after losing more than $2 billion, 'The Washington Times'' announced on December 2009 that they are laying-off at least 40 percent of its staff and will shift to mainly free distribution.  Billed as a conservative alternative to the ''[[Washington Post]]'', the paper's recent circulation was at about 85,000 compared to the ''Post's'' 583,000. The main focus of '''The Times''' has shifted to a national audience on local coverage will be deemphasized.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120203295.html</ref>

The financially troubled newspaper has reached a preliminary agreement to sell the paper to the original owner, the Reverend Moon, who had turned over publication to his son, Preston, four years earlier.<ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Washington-Times-Sale/2010/08/25/id/368328 Editor: Deal in Works to Sell The Washington Times, NewsMax, August 25, 2010]</ref>

The financially troubled newspaper has reached a preliminary agreement to sell the paper to the original owner, the Reverend Moon, who had turned over publication to his son, Preston, four years earlier.<ref>[https://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Washington-Times-Sale/2010/08/25/id/368328 Editor: Deal in Works to Sell The Washington Times, NewsMax, August 25, 2010]</ref>

==References==

==References==