Difference between revisions of "Liberal corruption of the law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(selective prosecution) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*use of secret litigation funders, such as political donors or [[private equity]], which not traditionally allowed by the common law | *use of secret litigation funders, such as political donors or [[private equity]], which not traditionally allowed by the common law | ||
*selective prosecution | *selective prosecution | ||
| + | *insist on prosecuting Republican supporters in the overwhelmingly [[Democrat]] venue of [[D.C.]], such that the conviction rate of the Republicans is 100% while [[Dem]] defendants are acquitted nearly every time | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 21:12, May 10, 2023
Liberal corruption of the law is a series of changes to the traditionally beneficial common law in order to advance the harmful liberal agenda, and to attain power for liberals that they could ordinarily attain. Examples include:
- a contrived civil lawsuit against Trump to try to get a jury in a heavily Dem area to decide that he committed rape, even though not a criminal trial
- use of secret litigation funders, such as political donors or private equity, which not traditionally allowed by the common law
- selective prosecution
- insist on prosecuting Republican supporters in the overwhelmingly Democrat venue of D.C., such that the conviction rate of the Republicans is 100% while Dem defendants are acquitted nearly every time