Difference between revisions of "Reviewer"
From Conservapedia
Aziraphale (Talk | contribs) (categorize) |
DanielPulido (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents | + | A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents his opinions to his [[audience]] via print or electronic media. |
| − | A | + | A good reviewer can help potential consumers tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not. |
| − | Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about | + | Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about the work's creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own. |
[[category:art]] | [[category:art]] | ||
Revision as of 06:08, February 11, 2010
A reviewer is someone who analyzes and judges a work of art or entertainment and presents his opinions to his audience via print or electronic media.
A good reviewer can help potential consumers tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not.
Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about the work's creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own.
