nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + + + + + + +
→Challenges
::If you're going to challenge my entries, then I challenge all points from edits made to those entries after the fact. Greg Larson, for example, earned a significant number of point from categorizing my entries. If you're claiming the entries are invalid, then no one should get points from them and they should just be deleted from the site. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 15:26, 21 November 2007 (EST)
::If you're going to challenge my entries, then I challenge all points from edits made to those entries after the fact. Greg Larson, for example, earned a significant number of point from categorizing my entries. If you're claiming the entries are invalid, then no one should get points from them and they should just be deleted from the site. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 15:26, 21 November 2007 (EST)
:::In the issue of fairness, if the work done by SSchultz is removed as are the alterations made by Greg Larson to those articles, then the edits that I made to those articles should be removed as well and my points adjusted accordingly. Thanks [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:39, 23 November 2007 (EST)
* Judges, please give advance notice of a close in challenges because there may be more. Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:38, 21 November 2007 (EST)
* Judges, please give advance notice of a close in challenges because there may be more. Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:38, 21 November 2007 (EST)
* I've noticed that the inquiries to the team captains dealt with concerns with irregularities from the other team. In that case, I'm not sure we are looking at this the right way. I was pleased to enter the contest to help out my captain while at the same time improving the overall Conservapedia website. But when the gun sounded to end the contest and I finished tabulating my totals, I now revert to being part of the larger Conservapedia team which includes all members from the other team as well. If there are any irregularities or areas for improvement from the contest, I would like to think it involves all of the participants as a unit giving overall insight, and that the temporary dividing lines that we put ourselves into last week are no longer an issue. That being said, here are my overall thoughts about the contest:
:* I noticed some undeadended entries for articles of size where a single word on the top line was highlighted, and that was it. I believe in order to match the spirit of undeadending articles, that a pass through the article to apply other appropriate links should have been performed.
:* If a quality new entry is worth 10 points, it seems to me that open ended articles that have no point limits should have some type of reasonable cap that fits within the overall structure of the contest and the value of that edit.
:* These are my thoughts. Thank you [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:39, 23 November 2007 (EST)
== Judges ==
== Judges ==