Changes

385 bytes added ,  19:31, October 1, 2009
→‎Functors: new section
Line 98: Line 98:     
:No problem... thanks for catching the error in the statement!  Can't believe I missed that one. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 00:48, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
 
:No problem... thanks for catching the error in the statement!  Can't believe I missed that one. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 00:48, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Functors ==
 +
 +
Sorry to mess up your elegant article on mathematical functors with low-class computer stuff, but there are probably more people familiar with the latter usage.  :-(
 +
 +
Was the material on contravariant functors OK?  I remember learning about this back in college.  The cohomology functor is contravariant, right?
 +
 +
[[User:PatrickD|PatrickD]] 15:31, 1 October 2009 (EDT)
181

edits