Difference between revisions of "Talk:Middle-income countries"
From Conservapedia
(→The Time magazine article does not say the term "Middle-income countries" is a class warfare term) |
m (→The Time magazine article does not say the term "Middle-income countries" is a class warfare term) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Where in the article does it say what you claim it says? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:53, May 10, 2024 (EDT) | :Where in the article does it say what you claim it says? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:53, May 10, 2024 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::"Workers around the world burdened by stagnant incomes." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 21:54, May 10, 2024 (EDT) | + | ::"Workers around the world are burdened by stagnant incomes." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 21:54, May 10, 2024 (EDT) |
Revision as of 01:55, May 11, 2024
All this is measured in Petrodollars. 14:54, April 13, 2024 (EDT)
Grammar
How awkward and redundant is this: "According to Investopedia, "According to the World Bank...."?
What would we call this, a double appeal to authority?
According to Conservapedia, "An appeal to authority is an informal logical fallacy." Is this a double logical fallacy? RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 16:52, April 13, 2024 (EDT)
The Time magazine article does not say the term "Middle-income countries" is a class warfare term
The Time magazine article does not say the term "Middle-income countries" is a class warfare term.
If you want to show it is a class warfare term, then you will need a citation and not merely claim it is. Conservative (talk) 21:49, May 10, 2024 (EDT)
- Where in the article does it say what you claim it says? Conservative (talk) 21:53, May 10, 2024 (EDT)
- "Workers around the world are burdened by stagnant incomes." RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 21:54, May 10, 2024 (EDT)
