Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Community Portal"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
VargasMilan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Is it possible that black holes were featured in the Theory of Relativity to try to transform the untoward results of it from a "mathematical embarrassment" to a "wonder of nature"? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 22:46, February 16, 2025 (EST) | Is it possible that black holes were featured in the Theory of Relativity to try to transform the untoward results of it from a "mathematical embarrassment" to a "wonder of nature"? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 22:46, February 16, 2025 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Your best protection== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Once I quoted [[Chaucer]] to a narcissist, "Your best protection is the love of others." This made him change the subject after becoming uneasy, because he knew he had been untruthful with those who loved him and for that reason felt a chronic insecurity about whether they would support him, and so he also cut them off to certain degrees if he discovered they couldn't be useful in other ways to spite that same love which was unreliable in his perspective. | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's what comes to mind when I see my contributions on this page torched after having my access throttled for two-and-a-half-months. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This also reflects a cleanliness fetish, "In for a penny, in for a pound". If the designated scapegoat invests in a single share of a project, to be sure that doesn't anger God, the whole project has to be scrapped. What is the fallacy in this line of thinking? A Christian ought to know. A hint is that this is part of the old "fairness" not the new fairness. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And we ought to know the noblest fetish is still a fetish. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another thing I wonder about: Is the poison''ous'' deadly, or is only ''poison'' deadly? The reason I ask, is that Thomas Aquinas had something to say about the "deadly". [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Wednesday, 22:59, April 30, 2025 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:59, May 1, 2025
- This page contains some material moved from Talk:Main Page unrelated the Conservapedia:Main Page. This page is for general discussions on any topic of no particular nature.
Please abide by CP's civility guidelines, and do not place the name of other Users (even your own) in subheadings. God bless and Happy posting!
- If you have a complaint about another editor's actions, attitude, civility, or ideological leanings, place your complaint at Conservapedia:User complaints for full vetting from the community before the complaint makes its way up the administrative chain. Thank you.
Theory of Relativity
Is it possible that black holes were featured in the Theory of Relativity to try to transform the untoward results of it from a "mathematical embarrassment" to a "wonder of nature"? VargasMilan (talk) Sunday, 22:46, February 16, 2025 (EST)
Your best protection
Once I quoted Chaucer to a narcissist, "Your best protection is the love of others." This made him change the subject after becoming uneasy, because he knew he had been untruthful with those who loved him and for that reason felt a chronic insecurity about whether they would support him, and so he also cut them off to certain degrees if he discovered they couldn't be useful in other ways to spite that same love which was unreliable in his perspective.
That's what comes to mind when I see my contributions on this page torched after having my access throttled for two-and-a-half-months.
This also reflects a cleanliness fetish, "In for a penny, in for a pound". If the designated scapegoat invests in a single share of a project, to be sure that doesn't anger God, the whole project has to be scrapped. What is the fallacy in this line of thinking? A Christian ought to know. A hint is that this is part of the old "fairness" not the new fairness.
And we ought to know the noblest fetish is still a fetish.
Another thing I wonder about: Is the poisonous deadly, or is only poison deadly? The reason I ask, is that Thomas Aquinas had something to say about the "deadly". VargasMilan (talk) Wednesday, 22:59, April 30, 2025 (EDT)