| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{Essay By|TheAmericanRedoubt}} | | {{Essay By|TheAmericanRedoubt}} |
| | | | |
| − | = France Pays Dearly - [[Liberal]] [[Gun control | Gun Control]] Laws and [[Gun free zone | Free fire zones]] that Welcome [[Muslim]] [[Jihad]] [[Terrorist]]s = | + | = France Pays Dearly - [[Liberal]] [[Gun control|Gun Control]] Laws and [[Gun free zone|Free fire zones]] that Welcome [[Muslim]] [[Jihad]] [[Terrorist]]s = |
| | | | |
| | In this [[:Category:Essays about Conservatism|conservative]] [[essay]], I will discuss how [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) can be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. | | In this [[:Category:Essays about Conservatism|conservative]] [[essay]], I will discuss how [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) can be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. |
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | ---- | | ---- |
| | | | |
| − | On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement | cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire | satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship | silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause. | + | On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement|cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire|satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship|silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause. |
| | | | |
| − | The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)]. [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.<ref>Ibid.</ref>, <ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref> | + | The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)]. [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.,<ref>Ibid.</ref><ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish== | | ==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish== |
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| | <blockquote>"It seems like something one would be hard pressed to disagree with: the word “coexist,” written on a wall using a Muslim crescent as the letter “C,” a [[Star of David]] as the letter “X,” and a Christian cross as a “T.” | | <blockquote>"It seems like something one would be hard pressed to disagree with: the word “coexist,” written on a wall using a Muslim crescent as the letter “C,” a [[Star of David]] as the letter “X,” and a Christian cross as a “T.” |
| | | | |
| − | But in Paris, this particular iteration of the popular inscription — here, created by the street artist Combo, who also pasted a life-size photo of himself next to it — didn’t go down well with everybody. [[Le Monde]] reports that four young people asked the artist to remove it last weekend, and beat him up severely when he refused to do so."<ref>220 word [[Fair use]] citation. Saxena, V., "[http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence]". Published by: "DownTrend.com - Because that's the direction of our freedoms." Published on February 10, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015 </ref></blockquote> | + | But in Paris, this particular iteration of the popular inscription — here, created by the street artist Combo, who also pasted a life-size photo of himself next to it — didn’t go down well with everybody. [[Le Monde]] reports that four young people asked the artist to remove it last weekend, and beat him up severely when he refused to do so."<ref>220 word [[Fair use]] citation. Saxena, V., "[http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence]". Published by: "DownTrend.com - Because that's the direction of our freedoms." Published on February 10, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015</ref></blockquote> |
| | | | |
| | ==Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"== | | ==Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"== |
| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
| | The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones. | | The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones. |
| | | | |
| − | Can you expect [[Islam | Islamic]] [[execution]] squads in your town soon? Maybe. They likely will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic [[Anti-Americanism]] [[propaganda]] to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find [[American]] cities, especially in the West (such as [[Arizona]], [[Utah]], [[Alaska]], or the [[American Redoubt]] area of [[Idaho]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]]) and the South ([[Texas]], [[Arkansas]], [[Oklahoma]], [[Florida]]) , much more hazardous to their [[evil]] operations. | + | Can you expect [[Islam]]ic [[execution]] squads in your town soon? Maybe. They likely will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic [[Anti-Americanism]] [[propaganda]] to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find [[American]] cities, especially in the West (such as [[Arizona]], [[Utah]], [[Alaska]], or the [[American Redoubt]] area of [[Idaho]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]]) and the South ([[Texas]], [[Arkansas]], [[Oklahoma]], [[Florida]]) , much more hazardous to their [[evil]] operations. |
| | | | |
| | As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elite|liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims. | | As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elite|liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims. |
| Line 40: |
Line 40: |
| | [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) is the [[conservative]] alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the [[progressive]] [[police state]]'s [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]]. Constitutional carry can also be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. An example of an antiterrorist policy is [[Israel]] permitting its citizens to [[open carry|carry weapons]]. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2002/02/22/mideast_020222.html Israel shopper users her gun to stop a [[suicide bomber]]]. Accessed January 12, 2015</ref> | | [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) is the [[conservative]] alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the [[progressive]] [[police state]]'s [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]]. Constitutional carry can also be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. An example of an antiterrorist policy is [[Israel]] permitting its citizens to [[open carry|carry weapons]]. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2002/02/22/mideast_020222.html Israel shopper users her gun to stop a [[suicide bomber]]]. Accessed January 12, 2015</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]]<ref> [https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref>, says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become '[[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists|free fire zones]]' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives." | + | Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]],<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref> says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become 'free fire zones' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives." |
| | | | |
| − | Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage|courageous]], with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings." | + | Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage]]ous, with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings." |
| | | | |
| | Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever [[weapons]] are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the [[NRA]] and [[NRA-ILA]] as they fights these [[freedom]] battles to genuinely increase public safety."<ref>[[Nutnfancy]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEbXuwDiUSo "Gun Free, Death Pay"], [[Utah]] in the [[American Redoubt]], [[YouTube]]. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.</ref> | | Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever [[weapons]] are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the [[NRA]] and [[NRA-ILA]] as they fights these [[freedom]] battles to genuinely increase public safety."<ref>[[Nutnfancy]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEbXuwDiUSo "Gun Free, Death Pay"], [[Utah]] in the [[American Redoubt]], [[YouTube]]. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.</ref> |
| Line 49: |
Line 49: |
| | * [[Boston T. Party]], ''[[Boston's Gun Bible]]'', [[American Redoubt]] [[Wyoming]], [[Javelin Press]], 2009 | | * [[Boston T. Party]], ''[[Boston's Gun Bible]]'', [[American Redoubt]] [[Wyoming]], [[Javelin Press]], 2009 |
| | | | |
| − | ==External Links== | + | ==External links== |
| | * [http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence] | | * [http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence] |
| | | | |
| Line 55: |
Line 55: |
| | {{reflist|2}} | | {{reflist|2}} |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category : Pro Second Amendment]] | + | [[Category:Pro Second Amendment]] |
| − | [[Category : Gun control]] | + | [[Category:Gun control]] |
| − | [[Category : Second Amendment]] | + | [[Category:Second Amendment]] |
| − | [[Category : Firearms]] | + | [[Category:Firearms]] |
| − | [[Category : American Redoubt]] | + | [[Category:American Redoubt]] |
| − | [[Category : Strategic Relocation]] | + | [[Category:Strategic Relocation]] |
| − | [[Category : Anti-Communism]] | + | [[Category:Anti-Communism]] |
| − | [[Category : Politics]] | + | [[Category:Politics]] |
| − | [[Category : Liberalism]] | + | [[Category:Liberalism]] |
| − | [[Category : France]] | + | [[Category:France]] |
| − | [[Category : Terrorism]] | + | [[Category:Terrorism]] |
| | [[Category:Islamic terrorism]] | | [[Category:Islamic terrorism]] |
| − | [[Category : Survivalism]] | + | [[Category:Survivalism]] |
| − | [[Category : Essay]] | + | [[Category:Essay]] |
| − | [[Category : Political Essays|Liberal Gun Control Free Fire Zones Welcomes Islamic Terrorists]] | + | [[Category:Political Essays|Liberal Gun Control Free Fire Zones Welcomes Islamic Terrorists]] |
| − | [[Category : Essays about Conservatism]] | + | [[Category:Essays about Conservatism]] |
| − | [[Category : Gun Free Zones]] | + | [[Category:Gun Free Zones]] |
| | [[Category:Fourth Generation Warfare]] | | [[Category:Fourth Generation Warfare]] |