Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{Essay By|TheAmericanRedoubt}}  
 
{{Essay By|TheAmericanRedoubt}}  
   −
= France Pays Dearly - [[Liberal]] [[Gun control | Gun Control]] Laws and [[Gun free zone | Free fire zones]] that Welcome [[Muslim]] [[Jihad]] [[Terrorist]]s =
+
= France Pays Dearly - [[Liberal]] [[Gun control|Gun Control]] Laws and [[Gun free zone|Free fire zones]] that Welcome [[Muslim]] [[Jihad]] [[Terrorist]]s =
    
In this [[:Category:Essays about Conservatism|conservative]] [[essay]], I will discuss how [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) can be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]].  
 
In this [[:Category:Essays about Conservatism|conservative]] [[essay]], I will discuss how [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) can be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]].  
Line 7: Line 7:  
----
 
----
   −
On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement | cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire | satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship | silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause.  
+
On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement|cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire|satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship|silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause.  
   −
The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)].  [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.<ref>Ibid.</ref>, <ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref>
+
The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)].  [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.,<ref>Ibid.</ref><ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref>
    
==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish==
 
==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish==
Line 22: Line 22:  
<blockquote>"It seems like something one would be hard pressed to disagree with: the word “coexist,” written on a wall using a Muslim crescent as the letter “C,” a [[Star of David]] as the letter “X,” and a Christian cross as a “T.”
 
<blockquote>"It seems like something one would be hard pressed to disagree with: the word “coexist,” written on a wall using a Muslim crescent as the letter “C,” a [[Star of David]] as the letter “X,” and a Christian cross as a “T.”
   −
But in Paris, this particular iteration of the popular inscription — here, created by the street artist Combo, who also pasted a life-size photo of himself next to it — didn’t go down well with everybody. [[Le Monde]] reports that four young people asked the artist to remove it last weekend, and beat him up severely when he refused to do so."<ref>220 word [[Fair use]] citation. Saxena, V., "[http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence]". Published by: "DownTrend.com - Because that's the direction of our freedoms." Published on February 10, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015 </ref></blockquote>
+
But in Paris, this particular iteration of the popular inscription — here, created by the street artist Combo, who also pasted a life-size photo of himself next to it — didn’t go down well with everybody. [[Le Monde]] reports that four young people asked the artist to remove it last weekend, and beat him up severely when he refused to do so."<ref>220 word [[Fair use]] citation. Saxena, V., "[http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence]". Published by: "DownTrend.com - Because that's the direction of our freedoms." Published on February 10, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015</ref></blockquote>
    
==Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"==
 
==Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"==
Line 31: Line 31:  
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones.
 
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones.
   −
Can you expect [[Islam | Islamic]] [[execution]] squads in your town soon? Maybe. They likely will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic [[Anti-Americanism]] [[propaganda]] to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find [[American]] cities, especially in the West (such as [[Arizona]], [[Utah]], [[Alaska]], or the [[American Redoubt]] area of [[Idaho]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]]) and the South ([[Texas]], [[Arkansas]], [[Oklahoma]], [[Florida]]) , much more hazardous to their [[evil]] operations.  
+
Can you expect [[Islam]]ic [[execution]] squads in your town soon? Maybe. They likely will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic [[Anti-Americanism]] [[propaganda]] to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find [[American]] cities, especially in the West (such as [[Arizona]], [[Utah]], [[Alaska]], or the [[American Redoubt]] area of [[Idaho]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]]) and the South ([[Texas]], [[Arkansas]], [[Oklahoma]], [[Florida]]) , much more hazardous to their [[evil]] operations.  
    
As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elite|liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims.
 
As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elite|liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims.
Line 40: Line 40:  
[[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) is the [[conservative]] alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the [[progressive]] [[police state]]'s [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]]. Constitutional carry can also be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. An example of an antiterrorist policy is [[Israel]] permitting its citizens to [[open carry|carry weapons]]. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2002/02/22/mideast_020222.html Israel shopper users her gun to stop a [[suicide bomber]]]. Accessed January 12, 2015</ref>
 
[[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) is the [[conservative]] alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the [[progressive]] [[police state]]'s [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]]. Constitutional carry can also be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. An example of an antiterrorist policy is [[Israel]] permitting its citizens to [[open carry|carry weapons]]. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2002/02/22/mideast_020222.html Israel shopper users her gun to stop a [[suicide bomber]]]. Accessed January 12, 2015</ref>
   −
Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]]<ref> [https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he  established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref>, says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become '[[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists|free fire zones]]' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives."   
+
Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]],<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he  established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref> says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become 'free fire zones' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives."   
   −
Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage|courageous]], with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings."  
+
Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage]]ous, with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings."  
    
Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever [[weapons]] are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the [[NRA]] and [[NRA-ILA]] as they fights these [[freedom]] battles to genuinely increase public safety."<ref>[[Nutnfancy]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEbXuwDiUSo "Gun Free, Death Pay"], [[Utah]] in the [[American Redoubt]], [[YouTube]]. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.</ref>
 
Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever [[weapons]] are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the [[NRA]] and [[NRA-ILA]] as they fights these [[freedom]] battles to genuinely increase public safety."<ref>[[Nutnfancy]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEbXuwDiUSo "Gun Free, Death Pay"], [[Utah]] in the [[American Redoubt]], [[YouTube]]. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.</ref>
Line 49: Line 49:  
* [[Boston T. Party]], ''[[Boston's Gun Bible]]'', [[American Redoubt]] [[Wyoming]], [[Javelin Press]], 2009
 
* [[Boston T. Party]], ''[[Boston's Gun Bible]]'', [[American Redoubt]] [[Wyoming]], [[Javelin Press]], 2009
   −
==External Links==
+
==External links==
 
* [http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence]
 
* [http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/french-artist-combo-coexistence French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence]
   Line 55: Line 55:  
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
   −
[[Category : Pro Second Amendment]]
+
[[Category:Pro Second Amendment]]
−
[[Category : Gun control]]
+
[[Category:Gun control]]
−
[[Category : Second Amendment]]
+
[[Category:Second Amendment]]
−
[[Category : Firearms]]
+
[[Category:Firearms]]
−
[[Category : American Redoubt]]
+
[[Category:American Redoubt]]
−
[[Category : Strategic Relocation]]
+
[[Category:Strategic Relocation]]
−
[[Category : Anti-Communism]]
+
[[Category:Anti-Communism]]
−
[[Category : Politics]]
+
[[Category:Politics]]
−
[[Category : Liberalism]]
+
[[Category:Liberalism]]
−
[[Category : France]]
+
[[Category:France]]
−
[[Category : Terrorism]]
+
[[Category:Terrorism]]
 
[[Category:Islamic terrorism]]
 
[[Category:Islamic terrorism]]
−
[[Category : Survivalism]]
+
[[Category:Survivalism]]
−
[[Category : Essay]]
+
[[Category:Essay]]
−
[[Category : Political Essays|Liberal Gun Control Free Fire Zones Welcomes Islamic Terrorists]]
+
[[Category:Political Essays|Liberal Gun Control Free Fire Zones Welcomes Islamic Terrorists]]
−
[[Category : Essays about Conservatism]]
+
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]
−
[[Category : Gun Free Zones]]
+
[[Category:Gun Free Zones]]
 
[[Category:Fourth Generation Warfare]]
 
[[Category:Fourth Generation Warfare]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,371

edits

Navigation menu