13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Talk:Transgender activism (view source)
Revision as of 17:18, January 22, 2008
, 17:18, January 22, 2008no edit summary
:I really can't see a reasonable justification for this. While the distinctions given exist, providing an article for each would be covering far too in-depth a sexual topic. It is a common value of conservatives that sex-education should only be provided by the parent. Covering GID, and transgender activism is one thing, however going into depth about what distinguishes a cross-dresser from a transsexual is far too invasive into the territory of sex ed. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 16:34, 7 December 2007 (EST)
:I really can't see a reasonable justification for this. While the distinctions given exist, providing an article for each would be covering far too in-depth a sexual topic. It is a common value of conservatives that sex-education should only be provided by the parent. Covering GID, and transgender activism is one thing, however going into depth about what distinguishes a cross-dresser from a transsexual is far too invasive into the territory of sex ed. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 16:34, 7 December 2007 (EST)
:A reasonable, accurate treatment of transgender/intersex/transvestism would not be sexual nor family-unfriendly. If we focus on unfounded claims that transgender/transsexuality is some sort of paraphilia, then it will be -- but then, we could write a lot of pages that way and get nowhere in creating an accurate, family-friendly 'pedia. [[User:Mermaid|Gabe]] 12:18, 22 January 2008 (EST)