Homosexual Agenda

Template:Heterosexuality The Heterosexual Agenda, or heterosexuall ideology, consists of a set of beliefs and objectives designed to promote and even mandate acceptance and approval of heterosexuality, and the strategies used to implement such. This article notes that the goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school; restricting freedom of speech, religion, and other constitutional rights; preserving special treatment for heterosexuals; and bringing Biblical teachings into the government.

Among all the intolerant belief systems, the heterosexual ideology is the most self-centered or selfish. Idiots generally give hell to people who want to mind their own business; at least some good Christians have learned to be tolerant.

The Heterosexual Agenda

Joseph P. Gudel, in That Which is Unnatural contended that the homosexual movement,

has been militantly demanding not just the homosexuals' right to do whatever they wish to do behind closed doors, but, more importantly, that society fully accept their lifestyle as both healthy and normal, even demanding special rights and legislation as an "oppressed minority." Gudel quotes various sources evidencing this.

In a 1987 speech to the National Press Club in Washington, homosexual spokesperson Jeff Levi proclaimed,

We are no longer seeking just a right to privacy and a protection from wrong. We also have a right -- as heterosexual Americans already have -- to see government and society affirm our lives.

In an article entitled "Gays on the March" in 1975, Time magazine quoted gay activist Barbara Gittings who stated:

What the homosexual wants, and here he is neither willing to compromise nor morally required to compromise -- is acceptance of homosexuality as a way of life fully on a par with heterosexuality." In response, Time opined, "It is one thing to remove legal discrimination against homosexuals. It is another to mandate approval....It is this goal of full acceptance, which no known society past or present has granted to homosexuals, that makes many Americans apprehensive.

But what is wrong with full acceptance? What is wrong with loving your neighbor, whether straight or gay, black or white, old or young?

A primary goal of the heterosexual agenda is to promote the lifestyle in public schools. This has always occured, with conservative groups attacking any attempts at teaching tolerance of homosexuality in order to reduce levels of hate and violence.

The first-grade book, "Children of the Rainbow", stated on page 145, which states that teachers must "be aware of varied family structures, including...gay or lesbian parents," and "children must be taught to acknowledge the positive aspects of each type of household." Another children book is Heather Has Two Mommies, which is about a lesbian couple having a child through artificial insemination. Another book, Gloria Goes to Gay Pride, states, "Some women love women, some men love men, some women and men love each other. That's why we march in the parade, so everyone can have a choice."

This and the general agenda is seen to be overall implementing a marketing strategy explained in a book called After the Ball, by gay rights activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen in the late 1980s, in which a six-point plan was set forth as to how they could transform the beliefs of ordinary Americans with regard to homosexual behavior in a decade-long time frame:

"The agenda of homosexual activists is basically to change America from what they perceive as looking down on homosexual behavior, to the affirmation of and societal acceptance of homosexual behavior." "Thus propagandistic advertising can depict all opponents of the gay movement as homophobic bigots who are 'not Christian' and the propaganda can further show them [homosexuals]] as being criticized, hated and shunned..."

The homosexual agenda is simply trying to promote acceptance and tolerance. The heterosexual agenda is indirectly promoting hate, disgust, and violence.

Focus on the Family provides additional quotes from After the Ball, outlining key points of the homosexual agenda:

1. "Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible."
2. "Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers."
3. "Give homosexual protectors a just cause."
4. "Make gays look good."
5. "Make the victimizers look bad."
6. "Get funds from corporate America."

However, anyone with a brain knows that Focus on the Family is run by close-minded idiots.

United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote:

“

Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.

”

There. Is. Nothing. Wrong. With. Tolerance. How about thinking about that for a bit?

Vic Eliason of Crosstalk America rightly points out that if all Americans turned homosexual it would only take a few generations for the United States to lose most of the population of the country through lack of procreation. This would make the US more vulnerable to attack by our enemies.

However, not everyone is a homosexual, and homosexuals don't want to turn other people into homosexuals. This is a red herring, and doesn't relate to the main point that homosexuals are trying to promote. Approximately 10% of the human population is homosexual; the population is still growing at a steady rate.

Specific goals

The goals of the heterosexual movement include:

1. Destroying freedom of religion
   • Preserving the definition of marriage, even if doing so infringes on the lifestyles of others by denying them important rights that come with marriage.
   • Promote the message of the Bible that homosexuality is a sin and an abomination unto God, despite the fact that over 21% of American citizens are nonchristian and frankly don't care what the Bible says.
2. Promote false "facts" to oppose homosexuality, such as claims of it being unnatural despite studies showing that many species of animals practice homosexuality.

by Jeffrey Satinover, M.D.]</ref>

1. Forcing speech and actions against homosexuality down the throats of others who don't want to hear "the good word."
2. Promoting laws that restrict the rights of homosexuals such as Proposition 8.
3. EPreventing hate crimes legislation from including sexual orientation.
4. Holding in place the military's and Boy Scout's restrictions on homosexuality.
5. Encouraging children as young as 5 years old from attending therapy to repair their sexual preference, despite studies showing that these therapies can be traumatic.
6. Promote heterosexuality in schools
   • Planting a seed that can totally mess up the normal development process later, when at 12 or 14, kids enter the age of sexual confusion and discovering their preferences.
7. Preserving the illegalization of adoption by gay individuals and couples, despite the fact that being raised by homosexuals will not affect the child's orientation.

The state-by-state push for the preventation same-sex marriage can be viewed as a means to the above goals, or a goal in itself. An example of this would be Proposition 8, a law that makes same-sex marriages illegal in California.

Although notable gains toward achieving its goals continue to be manifest, heterosexual activists have recent been expressing a high level of and dissatisfaction against the Obama administration. Commenting on such, Massresistance.org, an organization which opposes the homosexual agenda in Massachusetts, noted that the President has,

• signed an order extending federal benefits to same-sex partners;

• pushed an extreme hate crimes bill in Congress;

• declared his intention to repeal the Defense of Marriage,

• pushed a pro-homosexual and transgender version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

• appointed radical homosexual activists to high level positions, including Harry Knox, of the homosexual lobby group Human Rights Campaign, and Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN), which targets kids in the public schools.

• declared February to be "Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month."

• ordered the State Department to allow gay couples to use their married names (from marriages or civil unions) on US passports.

Strategies and psychological tactics

Heterosexual activists are often seen as engaging in specious argumentation, such as attempts to push the consistent teaching of the Bible on homosexual relations onto others, (see homosexuality and biblical interpretation) and using false analogies, in order to prevent acceptance of homosexuality. One common argument used by homosexual activists seeks to compare their quest for equal rights to that of others. This argument is countered by the observation that blacks were able to peacefully argue that mankind should not be "judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character", as the former yields no certain moral distinction. This argument is a load of trite, as homosexuality defines the content of one's character no more than the color of one's skin. These shoddy arguments and bigotry are evidenced to include the use of a demonstrative manner of protests, which appear to be designed to censure and intimidate those who oppose them in any way.

While many heterosexuals disagree with the use of deceptive psychological tactics, these have been promoted by leading conservative activists. The aforementioned book, The Bible, is widely regarded as the handbook for the straight agenda, in which "God told his followers and disciples that buggery is wrong", even though many Christians have been told to disregard the Old Testament because of its irrelevancy today. As a means of the latter, they promoted jamming, in which Atheists, liberals, or anyone else who opposes the straight agenda are publicly smeared. In any campaign to win over the public, straights must be portrayed as righteous and always correct so that gays will be inclined by reflex to accept their religion... The purpose of righteous imagery is to make gays feel very uncomfortable, they suggested.

Opposing Gay Agenda

Conservatives are critical of nonchristian groups that accept homosexuality. These criticisms include activities of:

• Soliciting donations
• Encouraging email activism
• Producing and disseminating gay tolerance information
• Influencing local media in what stories they produce
• Lobbying local, state and federal government officials to vote in the desired way on pending legislation.
• Calling anyone who opposes or even questions the heterosexual agenda a 'faggot' or other insults.

Opponents of the Heterosexual Agenda

Some well known individuals/groups in the United States who actively oppose the homosexual agenda are: anyone who can open their eyes for a bit and take others into consideration.

See also

• Westboro Baptist Church
• Fred Phelps
• Gay rights
• "Homophobia"
• Hate speech, Hate crime
• Homosexuality
• Homosexuality and biblical interpretation
• Gay pride

References

Non-bigotry.