Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chimpanzee"
m |
(Reverted to last legitimate edit) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | :It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:there it's gone --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | :there it's gone --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[user:Conservative|Conservative]], cited sources are not "babble." If you disagree with them, debate it here with people who have studied up on it.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Give it up [[User:AmesG|AmesG]] he's on a rampage. Lost in his own (very) little world. Pity him. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:41, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Conservative, you are abusing your SysOp power and are completely gutless to boot. --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 23:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Will you both please sign onto my post on [[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s wall on this very same subject?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:55, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Awesome. I love conservative! He really makes this site fun.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 23:59, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Shouldn't someone mention the intelligence of chimpanzees, for example their tool making and tool use? --[[User:Sophie-Lou|Sophie-Lou]] 09:53, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I removed all that epochal silliness about "2005 AD." Also I object to describing McBrearty, et al., as "evolutionist researchers." I don't think "evolutionology" is an established field. They were probably zoologists, or paleontologists, or something like that -- I'm not sure.--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 03:41, 20 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Category == | ||
| + | If/when the article becomes unprotected, it would be good if someone could put this article into [[:Category:Mammals]]. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reversion== | ||
| + | I reverted the article to the AmesG article. It presented concise, accurate, and cited information about the current understanding on the taxonomic relationship between chimps and humans. It isn't biased towards creationism or evolution, instead it is just an entry of facts.[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:40, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Animals vs. people== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't like the casual assumption that chimps and humans are "just primates together". People are on an entirely different level than animals. We don't endorse the views of Peter Singer or [[PeTA]] here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:48, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:20, March 7, 2022
Great article, hope it lasts. Palmd001 23:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --Crackertalk 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- there it's gone --Crackertalk 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Conservative, cited sources are not "babble." If you disagree with them, debate it here with people who have studied up on it.--AmesG 23:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Give it up AmesG he's on a rampage. Lost in his own (very) little world. Pity him. --Crackertalk 23:41, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Conservative, you are abusing your SysOp power and are completely gutless to boot. --Dave3172 23:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Will you both please sign onto my post on Aschlafly's wall on this very same subject?--AmesG 23:55, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Awesome. I love conservative! He really makes this site fun.--Jack 23:59, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- Shouldn't someone mention the intelligence of chimpanzees, for example their tool making and tool use? --Sophie-Lou 09:53, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
I removed all that epochal silliness about "2005 AD." Also I object to describing McBrearty, et al., as "evolutionist researchers." I don't think "evolutionology" is an established field. They were probably zoologists, or paleontologists, or something like that -- I'm not sure.--All Fish Welcome 03:41, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
Category
If/when the article becomes unprotected, it would be good if someone could put this article into Category:Mammals. --Interiot 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Reversion
I reverted the article to the AmesG article. It presented concise, accurate, and cited information about the current understanding on the taxonomic relationship between chimps and humans. It isn't biased towards creationism or evolution, instead it is just an entry of facts.ColinR 03:40, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Animals vs. people
I don't like the casual assumption that chimps and humans are "just primates together". People are on an entirely different level than animals. We don't endorse the views of Peter Singer or PeTA here. --Ed Poor Talk 23:48, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
