Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal triumphalism"
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→I agree that it would be better to start from scratch for several reasons) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→I agree that it would be better to start from scratch for several reasons) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
This is not correct. For example, Donald Trump says that China is raping the USA due to unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, etc. etc. So any reports I have in my essay of China's bad behavior is not solely held by liberals. | This is not correct. For example, Donald Trump says that China is raping the USA due to unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, etc. etc. So any reports I have in my essay of China's bad behavior is not solely held by liberals. | ||
| − | And the business community is filled with conservatives and they are reporting factual figures about: China's severe property crisis (3 times the leverage of USA's 2007/2008 property crisis), its huge tanking of its stock markets ($7 trillion loss in 3 years), its high youth unemployment and its big demographic crisis. | + | And the business community is filled with conservatives and they are reporting factual figures about: China's severe property crisis (3 times the leverage of USA's 2007/2008 property crisis), its huge tanking of its stock markets ($7 trillion loss in 3 years), its high youth unemployment, many millionaires fleeing China and its big demographic crisis. |
| − | '''2.''' The article claims that various statements about Russia are Russophobia, but I cite Putin himself about Russia's demographic crisis and low labor productivity and these are big problems that Russia faces. Furthermore, I cite sources like Oil.com, etc. | + | '''2.''' The article claims that various statements about Russia are Russophobia, but I cite Putin himself about Russia's demographic crisis and low labor productivity and these are big problems that Russia faces. Furthermore, I cite sources like Oil.com, etc. In addition, nobody really disputes that Russia recently had a brain drain, loss of technical people, labor shortages in the oil/gas industry and other sectors, etc. |
'''3.''' When a website has a page which is largely a duplicate page of another, the duplicate page is often largely ignored by the search engines. Below is the tracking of the page views of Rob's mainspace "liberal triumphalism" vs. the page views of my essay. | '''3.''' When a website has a page which is largely a duplicate page of another, the duplicate page is often largely ignored by the search engines. Below is the tracking of the page views of Rob's mainspace "liberal triumphalism" vs. the page views of my essay. | ||
Revision as of 12:12, March 24, 2024
What a mess and jumbled streams of psychotic thought processes to try to make sense of. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 12:27, March 7, 2024 (EST)
Wow. I mean wow.
- U.S. inventors receive nearly half of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents
should read:
- U.S. inventors receive less than half of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents
The original author has no discernment ability when reading propaganda. No wonder we struggle to Make America Great Again. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 16:20, March 7, 2024 (EST)
I should get paid hourly or receive a medal for having to properly edit and wade through this psychotic crap. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:39, March 8, 2024 (EST)
"Liberal triumphalism" is an insightful concept, but let's reduce the in-site copying as duplication on a website is not good. Thanks!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:13, March 8, 2024 (EST)
- I've been working on that, but the original is so poorly researched and written, it's very time consuming. I've already striped out much of the worst bigoted slop. I'll keep at it til it's much improved. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:13, March 8, 2024 (EST)
- Look closely at all these pages, they are all duplicate copies of each other, each one with a few uplinks to neocon sources added w/some cut n paste text and a new bigoted title intended to offend. Other than the title, there's not much text or content added from the author in any of them. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:19, March 8, 2024 (EST)
- For example, look at the "File use" on any image, such as this one, and you will find the same duplicate copying on dozens of pages. In the example given, the text and sources cited are faulty. This is spamming. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:34, March 8, 2024 (EST)
- I still think it would be easier to start over from scratch rather than read through all this tortuous, neocon globalist propaganda User:Conservative worked so studiously on. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:27, March 24, 2024 (EDT)
I agree that it would be better to start from scratch for several reasons
I agree with Andy removing a link to my user page and essay. Andy is very aware that I am not a liberal. And while it is true that I sometimes employ humor in my essays/elsewhere and say things like "On behalf of all Christendom, I hereby declare total victory over all atheistdom" or say things like "As much as I hate to do it, I hereby declare total victory. Olé! Olé! Olé!" or "I trust this clarifies matters", most people recognize and enjoy humor although some sour pusses and other petty people don't. In addition, while I am not a triumphalist, I do recognize reality and notice things like when sports teams have a big margin of victory over competitors, etc.
I concur with RobSmith that it would be better to start from scratch for several reasons which I give below:
1. The article currently has a section entitled "liberal views" of China.
This is not correct. For example, Donald Trump says that China is raping the USA due to unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, etc. etc. So any reports I have in my essay of China's bad behavior is not solely held by liberals.
And the business community is filled with conservatives and they are reporting factual figures about: China's severe property crisis (3 times the leverage of USA's 2007/2008 property crisis), its huge tanking of its stock markets ($7 trillion loss in 3 years), its high youth unemployment, many millionaires fleeing China and its big demographic crisis.
2. The article claims that various statements about Russia are Russophobia, but I cite Putin himself about Russia's demographic crisis and low labor productivity and these are big problems that Russia faces. Furthermore, I cite sources like Oil.com, etc. In addition, nobody really disputes that Russia recently had a brain drain, loss of technical people, labor shortages in the oil/gas industry and other sectors, etc.
3. When a website has a page which is largely a duplicate page of another, the duplicate page is often largely ignored by the search engines. Below is the tracking of the page views of Rob's mainspace "liberal triumphalism" vs. the page views of my essay.
Essay: The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future:
- 16,596 on 1-24-2024
- 16,639 on 1-25-2024 at 5:14pm
- 16,656 on 1-26-2024 at 1:24am
- 16,712 on 1-27-2024 at 6:07pm
- 16,901 on 1-31-2024 at 4:00am
- 16,984 2-3-2024 at 3:00am
- 19,032 times. 3-12-2024 at 7:58pm
- 19,139 times 3-15-2024 at 6:30pm
- 19,323 times 3-21-2024 at 10:41pm
- 2,145 times. 3-12-2024 at 8:01pm
- 2,149 times 3-15-2024 at 6:34pm
- 2,157 times. 3-21-2024
And Andy does not want an article to be largely a duplicate of an essay or other Conservapedia article.
So it appears as if the traffic from various search engines, social media shares, people sharing with their friends via email, etc. are much bigger for my essay over RobSmith's article which is very largely a copy of my essay with some factually incorrect titles and other changes to my essay.
Also, based on the traffic of RobSmith's article from 3-12-2024 to 3-21-2024, it does appear that this recent article had someone use a click bot on the article (or manually clicked on the article) before 3-12-2024 given that its recent traffic is low. Conservative (talk) 08:05, March 24, 2024 (EDT)
