Difference between revisions of "Template:Mainpageleft"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(88.5 million page views!!!)
m (tidy feat art header)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
[[File:Eratosthenes.jpg|thumb|[[Eratosthenes]].]]
 
[[File:Eratosthenes.jpg|thumb|[[Eratosthenes]].]]
  
<font size="4"> [[Prime number]]</font>
+
<font size="3"> '''[[Prime number]]'''</font>
  
 
A prime number is a [[natural number]] greater than 1 that is [[divisible]] by only 1 and itself. Equivalently, the number has exactly two [[factor]]s, 1 and itself. The first few prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13...
 
A prime number is a [[natural number]] greater than 1 that is [[divisible]] by only 1 and itself. Equivalently, the number has exactly two [[factor]]s, 1 and itself. The first few prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13...

Revision as of 08:39, April 21, 2009

Welcome to Conservapedia!

Please read The Conservapedia Commandments before contributing.

Conservapedia has had over 88,500,000 page views and over 622,000 page edits. The truth shall set you free. Are you a fan of Conservapedia and do you want some suggestions for letting more people know about Conservapedia? If so, please go here.

Note new guidelines regarding partisanship of sources.

Featured Article

Prime number

A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that is divisible by only 1 and itself. Equivalently, the number has exactly two factors, 1 and itself. The first few prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13...

Leonhard Euler wrote:

Mathematicians have tried in vain to this day to discover some order in the sequence of prime numbers, and we have reason to believe that it is a mystery into which the mind will never penetrate.

There is no upper limit to the quantity of primes, but there is no known formula for deriving the nth prime. The only even prime number is 2.

*Featured articles

The Masterpiece

John Constable

Constable Dedham Vale 1802.JPG

Dedham Vale, 1802.

Article of the Year: Evolution

Darwin monkey cartoon.jpg

In 2006, the prestigious science journal Science reported concerning the United States: "The percentage of people in the country who accept the idea of evolution has declined from 45 in 1985 to 40 in 2005. Meanwhile the fraction of Americans unsure about evolution has soared from 7 per cent in 1985 to 21 per cent last year."[10]

  • "Gallup's analysis says religiosity outweighs educational level in shaping views on evolution." (USN)

Discover what Wikipedia, the public school systems, and the liberal media don't want you to know about the creation vs. evolution issue.

Conservapedia's Highlighted Article

Conservapedia's highlighted article is Richard Dawkins.

A study reported that the liberal media is biased towards pro-atheism coverage.[11] Do you want to know what the liberal media is not reporting about evolutionist and atheist Richard Dawkins? Please examine Conservapedia's Richard Dawkins article!

Watch this video of evolutionist Richard Dawkins being stumped by the question of a creationist!

Popular Articles at Conservapedia

Bible Verse

22 Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and truth shall be to them that devise good. 23 In all labour there is profit: but the talk of the lips tendeth only to penury. 24 The crown of the wise is their riches: but the foolishness of fools is folly. 25 A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.

Proverbs 14:22-25 (KJV)

Historical Quote

The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today. Let us move forward with strong and active faith.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Courses

Check out our free courses:

Guest World Treasure

Sunrise at the harbour of Dumaguete.jpg

Sunrise at the harbour of Dumaguete, Negros Oriental, Philippines.

Guest World Treasure (Click)

Quick Links

Evolutionary Racism of Hitler and Darwin

Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf was a work which contained evolutionary racism.[1] In his work Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote of "Monstrosities halfway between man and ape" and decried Christians going to "Central Africa" to set up "Negro missions," which Hitler stated resulted in the turning of "healthy . . . human beings into a rotten brood of bastards."[2] Adolf Hitler also wrote the following evolutionary racist statement in Mein Kampf: "The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable."[3] Charles Darwin was also an evolutionary racist.[4][5] Prominent evolutionist Richard Dawkins stated: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question."[6]

Uncharitableness and Atheists/Agnostics