Page history
January 11, 2023
April 21, 2022
→Criticism: Added the fact that Wikipedia regards MBFC as unreliable.
+272
→Political bias: Included mention of the fact that saying “Christianity is opposed to science”, or anything to that effect, is ignorant about the history of science
+56
March 21, 2021
December 5, 2020
September 24, 2020
September 13, 2020
September 12, 2020
"leftist" and "radical" mean roughly the same thing
-8
I don't think they do, though. While they make a lot of claims this isn't one of them as far as I can see
-61
September 10, 2020
September 6, 2020
September 4, 2020
→Others
m+5
→Others: true but "crackpot" does sound judgmental, unless you put in the notes
m+10
→Others
m+8
→Others: crucially
+107
→Others
m+42
→Others: right-wing, not far-right
+224
→Others: the article gets that point across well
-23
→Conservapedia: best not to misquote
m-2
→Political bias
+279
→Criticism
m+13
no edit summary
→Political bias
m+16
→Political bias: Robert Spencer
+520
→Political bias
m-1
August 23, 2020
→Political bias: link to Christian Science
+4
→Political bias: example of extreme bias from, ironically, Media Bias Fact Check
+227
→Political bias: Christian/conservative websites in one paragraph and news sources in the following one, and adjust "liberal establishment" to "progressive" to describe WP
-100
→Political bias: use "see also" template, move initial sentence to first paragraph
-6
→Political bias: moving criticism under separate heading
+13
→Political bias: does not capitalize the word "Bible"
+251
add heading, clarify statement about Snopes, since in terms of its coverage the two sites are very different
+55