Page history
Talk: Age of the Earth
February 17, 2018
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology: formatting, additional comment
+386
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology: re
+1,084
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology: Fix.
m+1
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology: fixing my typos, I'll respond later, as time allows.
m-1
February 16, 2018
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology
+588
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology
+1,448
formatting fix, reworded
m+11
→Bishop Ussher, Dendrochronology: new section
+2,052
September 1, 2015
August 29, 2015
→Not off by up to five orders of magnitude: Fabulous catch. I've removed the incorrect statement implying an old earth. Thank you.
+184
Q on unsourced sentence
+481
March 30, 2014
→Large focus on what is untrue
+381
→Large focus on what is untrue
+95
→Large focus on what is untrue
+558
→Large focus on what is untrue: typo in punctuation fixed
+1
→Large focus on what is untrue: This entry is not about "creationism. It is about the age of the earth.
+136
March 29, 2014
→Large focus on what is untrue
→Large focus on what is untrue
+80
→Large focus on what is untrue: new section
+420
February 18, 2012
Reverted edits by Chuckles (talk) to last revision by ScottDG
m-155
→Decay rates, again
+58
→Decay rates, again
+97
January 27, 2012
January 11, 2012
January 10, 2012
December 31, 2011
→Decay rates: It is obviously "implausible" because the universe is cooling over time, which would cause decay rates to change. It's no more possible for decay rates to remain constant than it wo
+295
→Decay rates: new section
+621
October 24, 2011
→Why the removal?
+738
→Why the removal?
+5
→Why the removal?
+14
→Why the removal?
+1,036
→Why the removal?
+273
→Why the removal?
+591
→Why the removal?
+401
→Why the removal?
+228
→Why the removal?
+162
→Why the removal?: new section
+558
September 20, 2011
September 7, 2011
June 15, 2011
June 14, 2011
→6 thousand years old: You're right. Thanks.
+86
→Atheism and Old Earth Theories: Your objection would silence many useful observations. Under your view, is it wrong to say that obesity is unhealthy?
+353
→6 thousand years old
+291
→6 thousand years old: No particular reason. Either of your suggested edits would be fine.
+131
no edit summary
m+1