Talk:Biden Regime

Biden junta is currently #3 on DuckDuckGo for the search term "Conservapedia", beating the article about CP on a certain wiki that begins with R and ends with i and has ationalwik in between. When was the last time any mainspace article beat out RW for the search term "Conservapedia"? Unique content is what search engines look for. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 03:48, 31 March 2021 (EDT)

Revising/Retitling the "Biden junta" article and removing the term "Biden junta" from main space articles. There is no "Biden junta"

As the Biden Junta took power, the American people were excluded from what traditionally has been a public event.

A junta is "A military or political group that rules a country after taking power by force."[1]

Did the US military install Joe Biden? Did Joe Biden and/or a paramilitary group go in with their guns blazing and install Joe Biden as president? Of course, the answer to these questions is no. There is no "Biden junta".

It is theoretically possible for the presidential election results to be called fraudulent by state governments and for Biden to be removed from and for Donald Trump to be installed as president, but for now Joe Biden is the president of the United States. To deny this is foolish. Biden sits in the Oval Office and he has issued executive orders. Unfortunately, for all intents and purposes, the Biden presidency is a fait accompli.

Wikipedia is foolish for calling evolution a fact. And Conservapedia is foolish for having the term "Biden junta" in its main space areas of its website.

Denialism and/or misrepresentation gets under my skin whether the political left or right is doing it.

I propose that the Biden junta article be retitled (Biden administration or Biden-Harris administration for example) and the article to be revised.

In addition, I propose that the term "Biden junta" be removed from all Conservapedia main space articles.

One of the many black helicopters of the Biden junta.

The purpose of encyclopedias is to give readers facts. Encyclopedias should not be attempts to create some kind of alternative reality. There is just one reality. Conservapedia should stick to the facts and not masquerade wishful thinking and denialism as being factual. Conservative (talk) 17:09, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

You going to censor the reality of what has happened from posterity? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:14, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

Your own definition sums it up: a "political group" "taking power by force." It was just our imagination that 25,000 troops stood guard behind barricades for three months during and after Biden was installed? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:17, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

Or the human rights abuses of labeling all Trump supporters as domestic terrorists right now is not "by force"? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:19, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

What about the raid on Guiliani's office, who had all the poop on election fraud? Did Guiliani surrender that evidence and his contacts voluntarily? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:20, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

And I suppose Republican election observers who were denied their lawful right to observe ballot counting were not forcibly removed, denied, or intimidated? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:24, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

Woke stormtroopers of the Biden junta, standing between freedom and the 2 million strong Peoples Liberation Army.

The reason why Conservapedia ranks #1 at Google for the term "Biden junta" is that other websites are not trying to foist the foolish notion of their being a "Biden junta". The whole "Biden junta" thing is absurd RobS.

By the way, when are the black helicopters of Biden junta going to land in all 50 state capitals of the USA?Conservative (talk) 17:25, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

RobS, you should be a political fiction screen play writer. You could write the script for the movie "Biden's Red Dawn" where Biden becomes president through a woke USA military or woke paramilitary force. Maybe Sylvester Stallone could play Joe "Rambo" Biden who storms the Oval Office with a machine gun and grenades. Conservative (talk) 17:29, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

Yes indeed, denialism is frustrating. Ratifying fraud is not in the American tradition. We're in unchartered constitutional waters. No one is talking about removing Biden and installing Trump. We simply wish to establish facts. And the evidence weighs against the legitimacy of the Biden junta at this moment. I for one, am not on board with your acceptance of incremental socialism. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:34, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

In the last few days, we've blown the lid off two of the six disputed counties:

• Maricopa County: blank ballots, and the total number of votes audited does not match the total number of votes reported election night;
• Fulton County: Stacey Abrams owned the temp service that supplied unqualified ballot counters as the regular ballot counters were under covid lockdown.

Now, we haven't even gotten into a myriad of other issues, such as evidence of CCP vote switching. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:42, June 18, 2021 (EDT)

The term Junta should not be equal to something bad as the Biden regime, the "Junta" word got a bad reputation in the KGB campaing against Pinochet and other Military Governments. therefore Junta should not be used as a synonym of a bad government and the article should be renamed in my opinion.--CatolicoAustral (talk) 20:38, June 8, 2022 (EDT)

A junta is an unelected governing committee, nothing more nor nothing less. It does not have to be military. RobS^Z+ 23:50, June 9, 2022 (EDT)

When Victoria Nuland managed the 2014 Maidan coup, Nuland hand-selected the members of the junta. It is the same people behind establishing the Maidan regime as were behind the Biden junta, and were responsible for the all the attempts to overthrow President Trump. RobS^Z+ 23:55, June 9, 2022 (EDT)

Junta is a term that today is used by the left as synonym of a dictatorship (having a bad connotation). "Junta" is a Spanish word ([2] [3]) that was used during the Napoleonic occupation of Spain in early XIX Century as well in the Hispanic American territories (that became Republics soon after). During the XX Century Military Governments the term was used because of this historic connotation, that way the directory of the nation presided by the Armed Forces was known as "Junta de Gobierno" just as the original Junta of 1810. The term was also used in Argentina in 1976. The international propaganda of the left against these governments made the word "Junta" a bad reputation, ignoring its original meaning and using it to describe "illegitimate governments" in their view. The word itself should not be used for illegitimate governments, to the contrary, should be used for a government formed after a big crysis, even with a positive meaning. Using it for Biden is continuing the use of the word as something "bad" as the Biden regime is. That's why I think the use of words is important and we should not cede in perpetuating a bad reputation for this Spanish term.--CatolicoAustral (talk) 10:11, June 10, 2022 (EDT)