Wikipedia on bestiality

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The atheist philosopher Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality (as well as abortion, infanticide and euthanasia). Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-evolution academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at Princeton University.[1] See: Atheism and bestiality

Bestiality is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The Wikipedia project was initiated by atheist Jimmy Wales.[2] An irony of internet history is that Jimmy Wales, despite being an atheist, refers to himself as Wikipedia's "spiritual leader".[3] Despite its official "neutrality policy," Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias.

As of July 18, 2012, Wikipedia's article on zoophilia/bestiality has an entire section on "arguments for zoophilia" plus pictures depicting zoophilia as well as a section on "arguments against zoophilia". No worthwhile encyclopedia in existence has an article on zoophilia/bestiality with an entire section on "arguments for zoophilia" plus pictures depicting zoophilia. As of September 24, 2011, Wikipedia has a "Zoophilia and the law" article which has a section on the impact of zoophilia laws where eight alleged negative impacts of zoophilia laws are given, but no positive impacts of the laws are given.[4]

Given various comments within the atheist and evolutionist communities concerning bestiality, it is not surprising that the liberal leaning Wikipedia has the content it does on bestiality (see: Atheism and bestiality and Evolutionary belief and bestiality). Liberals are more likely to believe in evolutionary pseudoscience. Also, since World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism have been atheists.[5]

See also

Notes