Difference between revisions of "User:PeterKa"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
*[[Nuclear option]], [[Star_Trek_franchise#Political_themes]], [[Tang Tuyet Minh]], [[Roman Warm Period]], [[No Gun Ri]], [[Vietcong]], [[Republic of China]],
 
*[[Nuclear option]], [[Star_Trek_franchise#Political_themes]], [[Tang Tuyet Minh]], [[Roman Warm Period]], [[No Gun Ri]], [[Vietcong]], [[Republic of China]],
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
*祂就差遣自己的儿子借着一位女子降生,并受律法的约束,({{bibleverse|Galatians|4:4|CCB}})

Revision as of 09:54, February 5, 2014

"Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome in your user namespace," according to Wikipedia policy. But I found out the hard way that this kind of essay is not so welcome. In May, there was a huge discussion about it and it was finally rev-deleted. A feminist oversighter blocked me a couple of weeks later. At the time, there was some handwaving and a lame rationale about edit warring. But I think it is safe to say that my block and ban were generally understood as ideological. You can read the full story in my Arbcom appeal. Update: I added Arbcom's reply. I have as much experience on Wikipedia as any of the people judging me. But all I can get is a "don't call us, we'll call you" type of response.

What I have written



  • 祂就差遣自己的儿子借着一位女子降生,并受律法的约束,(Galatians 4:4)