Difference between revisions of "Atheism and irrationality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
  
−
Despite atheists commonly adopting pretentious monikers such as rationalists, freethinker, brights (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]), in recent years there has been a number of conspicuous examples of atheists showing a reluctance to intellectually defend atheism in formal debate (see: [[Atheism and cowardice]]).  
+
Despite atheists commonly adopting pretentious monikers such as rationalists, freethinker, brights (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]), in recent years there has been a number of conspicuous examples of atheists showing a reluctance to intellectually defend atheism in formal debate (see: [[Atheism and cowardice]]).
 +
 
 +
As far as atheists lacking courage, in 2010, Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]], who specializes in religion/irreligion/demographics/politics, wrote:
 +
{{cquote|Worldwide, the [[Desecularization|march of religion]] can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, socialism and 1960s anarchist-liberalism. Ironically, secularism's [[Global atheism|demographic deficit]] means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm."<ref>[http://www.sneps.net/uploadsepk/JQR%20Demography.pdf Shall the religious inherit the earth? - Eric Kaufmann]</ref>}}
  
 
== Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of theism/creation ==
 
== Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of theism/creation ==

Revision as of 17:59, October 6, 2014

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[1] For example, the atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic.[2]

The atheist worldview cannot explain the existence of consciousness either and the theistic worldview can offer a reasonable explanation.[3]

Advocates of mind uploading (Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to computer storage mediums) are generally strong advocates of cryonics as well.[4] Mind uploading is not a feasible hypothesis.[5] See also: Atheism and cryonics

Additionally, naturalism and reason are incompatible and believing in naturalism is therefore self-defeating. In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [6]

Despite atheists commonly adopting pretentious monikers such as rationalists, freethinker, brights (see: Atheism and arrogance), in recent years there has been a number of conspicuous examples of atheists showing a reluctance to intellectually defend atheism in formal debate (see: Atheism and cowardice).

As far as atheists lacking courage, in 2010, Professor Eric Kaufmann, who specializes in religion/irreligion/demographics/politics, wrote:

“ Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, socialism and 1960s anarchist-liberalism. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm."[7] ”

Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of theism/creation

General articles:

Atheism and the laws of logic

Transcendental argument for the existence of God

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to Michael Martin's cancellation of their scheduled debate.[8]

See also: Transcendental argument for the existence of God

Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God

Existence of the universe

Argument from contingency

Existence of consciousness

Mind uploading

Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to computer storage mediums. Mind loading is not feasible.

C.S. Lewis's argument for reason and for the irrationality of materialism

Logic and theism/creation

Videos

See also

Books

References

  1. ↑ Atheism by Matt Slick
  2. ↑
  3. ↑ The Argument from Consciousness for the Existence of God by John Piippo, 3/20/2012
  4. ↑ Mind uploading - Thought experiments as knowledge
  5. ↑
  6. ↑
  7. ↑ Shall the religious inherit the earth? - Eric Kaufmann
  8. ↑ The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein