Difference between revisions of "Atheism and irrationality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 158: Line 158:
  
 
*[http://vimeo.com/102663614 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism Worldview with JP Moreland, part 1]
 
*[http://vimeo.com/102663614 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism Worldview with JP Moreland, part 1]
−
*[The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism with JP Moreland, part 2]
+
*[http://vimeo.com/103277405 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism with JP Moreland, part 2]
  
 
*[http://vimeo.com/105068126 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism Worldview with JP Moreland, part 4]
 
*[http://vimeo.com/105068126 The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism Worldview with JP Moreland, part 4]

Revision as of 20:59, October 8, 2014

The evolutionist Dr. Scott Todd, an immunologist at Kansas State University, wrote: "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic".[1]

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[2]

Atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic

See also: Transcendental argument for the existence of God

The atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic.[3]

Atheist worldview cannot explain consciousness

The atheist worldview cannot explain the existence of consciousness either and the theistic worldview can offer a reasonable explanation.[4]

Advocates of mind uploading (Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to computer storage mediums) are generally strong advocates of cryonics as well.[5] Mind uploading is not a feasible hypothesis.[6] See also: Atheism and cryonics

Naturalism is incompatible with reason

Additionally, naturalism and reason are incompatible and believing in naturalism is therefore self-defeating. In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [7]

Incoherence of atheism and various inconsistencies

Atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.[8]

Formal debates and the lack of confidence of the atheist community

Despite atheists commonly adopting pretentious monikers such as rationalist, freethinker and brights (see: Atheism and arrogance), in recent years there has been a number of conspicuous examples of atheists showing a reluctance to intellectually defend atheism in formal debate (see: Atheism and cowardice).

As far as atheists lacking courage, in 2010, Professor Eric Kaufmann, who specializes in religion/irreligion/demographics/politics, wrote:

“ Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, socialism and 1960s anarchist-liberalism. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm."[9] ”

Atheists commonly use logical fallacies in their arguments

Atheists commonly use logical fallacies in their arguments.[10]

One of the most common logical fallacies atheists, agnostics and evolutionists employ is the fallacy of exclusion. For example, the evolutionist Dr. Scott Todd, an immunologist at Kansas State University, wrote: "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic".[11] See: Methodological naturalism and Atheism and naturalistic intelligence

Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of theism/creation

General articles:

Atheism and the laws of logic

Transcendental argument for the existence of God

Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to Michael Martin's cancellation of their scheduled debate.[12]

See also: Transcendental argument for the existence of God

Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God

Existence of the universe

Argument from contingency

Existence of consciousness

Mind uploading

Mind uploading is the notion that someday mankind may be able to scan and upload their minds to computer storage mediums. Mind loading is not feasible.

C.S. Lewis's argument for reason and for the irrationality of materialism

Atheism and incoherence and inconsistencies

Incoherence/inconsistency of naturalism:

Article relating to non-theistic Buddhism and Jacques Derrida's postmodernism (Derrida appears to have been an atheist):

Logic and theism/creation

Common logical fallacies that atheists employ

Videos

See also

Books

  • The Atheist's Fatal Flaw: Exposing Conflicting Beliefs by Norman Geisler and Daniel J. McCoy, Baker Publishing Group, June 2014
  • The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, And Hitchens by Vox Day, March 11, 2008
  • The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success by Rodney Stark, September 26, 2006
  • C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason by Victor Reppert
  • C. S. Lewis and the Crisis of a Christian by Gregory S. Cootsona, September 26, 2014

References

  1. ↑ http://creation.com/a-designer-is-unscientificeven-if-all-the-evidence-supports-one
  2. ↑ Atheism by Matt Slick
  3. ↑
  4. ↑ The Argument from Consciousness for the Existence of God by John Piippo, 3/20/2012
  5. ↑ Mind uploading - Thought experiments as knowledge
  6. ↑
  7. ↑
  8. ↑
  9. ↑ Shall the religious inherit the earth? - Eric Kaufmann
  10. ↑
  11. ↑ http://creation.com/a-designer-is-unscientificeven-if-all-the-evidence-supports-one
  12. ↑ The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein