Difference between revisions of "Gun-free zone"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A '''gun-free zone''' is usually a [[liberal]]-controlled place where, by [[Nanny state]] or [[Police state]] [[gun control]] [[law]] or company or other rule, no person may bring a [[gun]] on-site. | + | A '''gun-free zone''' (colloquially called "free fire zones" by conservatives) is usually a [[liberal]]-controlled place where, by [[Nanny state]] or [[Police state]] [[gun control]] [[law]] or company or other rule, no person may bring a [[gun]] on-site. |
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. So-called [[political correctness|politically correct]] "gun free zones" are known to [[Second Amendment]] [[self-defense]] supporting [[conservative]] [[patriot]]s, [[veteran]]s, [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] and [[gun enthusiast]]s via the [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct|politically corrected]] term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where criminals, [[gang]]s, [[War on Drugs|drug dealer]]s, [[mafia]], [[murderer]]s, [[young mass murderer]]s, and [[terrorist]]s are free to fire at will on defenseless [[gun control|disarmed]] conservatives and [[pollyanna|never armed]] liberals. | The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. So-called [[political correctness|politically correct]] "gun free zones" are known to [[Second Amendment]] [[self-defense]] supporting [[conservative]] [[patriot]]s, [[veteran]]s, [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] and [[gun enthusiast]]s via the [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct|politically corrected]] term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where criminals, [[gang]]s, [[War on Drugs|drug dealer]]s, [[mafia]], [[murderer]]s, [[young mass murderer]]s, and [[terrorist]]s are free to fire at will on defenseless [[gun control|disarmed]] conservatives and [[pollyanna|never armed]] liberals. | ||
Revision as of 01:31, January 13, 2015
A gun-free zone (colloquially called "free fire zones" by conservatives) is usually a liberal-controlled place where, by Nanny state or Police state gun control law or company or other rule, no person may bring a gun on-site.
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been left wing "unicorn utopia" pollyanna fantasy of the Anti-self-defense movement, for the simple reason that criminals by their nature never follow laws. So-called politically correct "gun free zones" are known to Second Amendment self-defense supporting conservative patriots, veterans, preppers and gun enthusiasts via the politically corrected term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where criminals, gangs, drug dealers, mafia, murderers, young mass murderers, and terrorists are free to fire at will on defenseless disarmed conservatives and never armed liberals.
The United States, Europe and most recently liberal Paris at Charlie Hebdo's offices have seen a number of mass murders and Muslim jihad terrorist attacks occurring in such zones.
Ironically, the Fort Hood venue where thirteen soldiers died at the hand of a Islamic terrorist, was a gun-free zone, per Clinton Administration military regulation.
So also was Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
- When a crazy gunman wants to go on a rampage, where do they choose to go on their rampage? They choose a gun free zone. Columbine was a gun free zone. So was Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook.[1]
Constitutional Carry is the Conservative Solution to "Free fire zones"
Constitutional carry (as both concealed carry and open carry as is common in Israel) is the conservative alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the progressive police state's Anti-self-defense movement. Constitutional carry can also be a useful antiterrorism tool in the American War on Terror. An example of an antiterrorist policy is Israel permitting its citizens to carry weapons. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.[2]
See Also
- Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists
- Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct
- Gun control quotes
- National Rifle Association - Gun Owners of America - Second Amendment Foundation
- John Lott
- Second Amendment: Self-defense, Home security, and Defense against Tyranny
- Gun Free Zone app
- Second Amendment
- Big government Welfare state leads to Nanny state, leads to Police state
- Liberal totalitarianism