Difference between revisions of "Last wordism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(At best, last wordism is a childish tactic characteristic of liberal style.) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Last wordism''' often betrays the weaknesses of "less intellectually robust presentations."<ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf</ref> | '''Last wordism''' often betrays the weaknesses of "less intellectually robust presentations."<ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf</ref> | ||
| − | At best, last wordism is a childish tactic characteristic of [[liberal style]]. At worst, it reflects a lack of personal responsibility or [[bullying]] | + | At best, last wordism is a childish tactic characteristic of [[liberal style]]. At worst, it reflects a lack of personal responsibility or [[bullying]], which is a characteristic of wrongdoing or [[sin]]fulness. |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 04:57, October 27, 2017
Last wordism is a liberal tactic used in an informal debate or discussion, resorting in the belief that victory can be achieved by having the "last word." A statement can be identified as last wordism if it adds no new information or substance to an argument. It is intended to achieve its effect through recency[1] rather than through relevance.
Last wordism often betrays the weaknesses of "less intellectually robust presentations."[2]
At best, last wordism is a childish tactic characteristic of liberal style. At worst, it reflects a lack of personal responsibility or bullying, which is a characteristic of wrongdoing or sinfulness.
References
- ↑ "Recency" is the state of being "recent", as in "most recent."
- ↑ http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf